Benjamin Admin
c39787ad96
Semantic correction of the knowledge base BEFORE the empirical loop (#59) is built — otherwise the Observation Store would learn from already-misclassified signals. The Silent Pass conflated two kinds of signal into one: an OBSERVATION ("I saw an SBOM in the repo") and a REQUIREMENT ("a tender DEMANDS an SBOM"). They were aliased to the same canonical id, so a tender clause read as "SBOM already present" and suppressed the very question that should have been asked. Fix — make the kind explicit and authoritative (no new architecture, data + thin wiring): - `kind` ∈ {observation, requirement} on ProducedSignal (producer may declare) and on the canonical SignalVocabularyEntry (AUTHORITATIVE — a mislabelled producer cannot collapse the two). - Vocabulary split: sbom_file_found → sbom_present (obs) + sbom_required (req); security_txt_or_cvd_policy → cvd_policy_present (obs) + psirt_required (req); add signed_updates_required. requirement signals are intentionally UNMAPPED in intake_signal_map (they describe a target, not state). - silent_intake() consumes ONLY kind==observation; requirement signals are preserved in `requirements_seen` (visible/auditable) but NEVER become a detected capability. - normalize_signals() stamps the vocabulary's kind onto every IntakeSignal; unknown ids still pass through. This is the same Observation-vs-Requirement split the Requirements Verification Platform rests on: observations are reality, requirements are targets, and their comparison is the delta. A tender / OEM spec / law now produces requirement signals; scanners / repos / documents produce observation signals. Tests: rewrote the two test_signal_producer cases that previously ASSERTED the bug (tender == repo) to pin the correct split; regression — `requires_sbom` yields no capability + stays in requirements_seen while `cyclonedx_found` still detects sbom_creation; endpoint-level regression that a tender requirement does not auto-detect and the gap stays asked; vocabulary-kind-overrides-mislabelled-producer. 25 onboarding tests pass, mypy --strict clean, demo runs, check-loc 0. Runtime effect → deploy + smoke. (Fix A; partial-vs- detected decoupling follows as Fix B before #59.)
breakpilot-compliance
DSGVO/AI-Act compliance platform — 10 services, Go · Python · TypeScript
Overview
breakpilot-compliance is a multi-tenant DSGVO/EU AI Act compliance platform that provides an SDK for consent management, data subject requests (DSR), audit logging, iACE impact assessments, and document archival. It ships as 10 containerised services covering an admin dashboard, a developer portal, a Python/FastAPI backend, a Go AI compliance engine, TTS, and a decentralised document store on IPFS. Every service is deployed automatically via Gitea Actions → Orca on every push to main.
Architecture
| Service | Tech | Port | Container |
|---|---|---|---|
| admin-compliance | Next.js 15 | 3007 | bp-compliance-admin |
| backend-compliance | Python / FastAPI 0.123 | 8002 | bp-compliance-backend |
| ai-compliance-sdk | Go 1.24 / Gin | 8093 | bp-compliance-ai-sdk |
| developer-portal | Next.js 15 | 3006 | bp-compliance-developer-portal |
| breakpilot-compliance-sdk | TypeScript SDK (React/Vue/Angular/vanilla) | — | — |
| consent-sdk | JS/TS Consent SDK | — | — |
| compliance-tts-service | Python / Piper TTS | 8095 | bp-compliance-tts |
| document-crawler | Python / FastAPI | 8098 | bp-compliance-document-crawler |
| dsms-gateway | Python / FastAPI / IPFS | 8082 | bp-compliance-dsms-gateway |
| dsms-node | IPFS Kubo v0.24.0 | — | bp-compliance-dsms-node |
All containers share the external breakpilot-network Docker network and depend on breakpilot-core (Valkey, Vault, RAG service, Nginx reverse proxy).
Quick Start
Prerequisites: Docker, Go 1.24+, Python 3.12+, Node.js 20+, Infisical CLI
git clone ssh://git@gitea.meghsakha.com:22222/Benjamin_Boenisch/breakpilot-compliance.git
cd breakpilot-compliance
# One-time per machine: log in to the self-hosted Infisical instance
infisical login --domain https://secrets.meghsakha.com
# Start the full stack with secrets injected from Infisical (env=dev)
make dev
Secrets are pulled from Infisical (secrets.meghsakha.com) at runtime; .env files are not used. See INFISICAL_SETUP.md for full onboarding, and make help for the rest of the targets (dev-build, dev-down, secrets, secrets-set).
For the Orca/Hetzner production target (x86_64), use the override:
make dev ENV=prod # or:
infisical run --env=prod -- docker compose -f docker-compose.yml -f docker-compose.hetzner.yml up -d
Development Workflow
Use feature branches off main. Supported prefixes: feat/, feature/, hotfix/.
git checkout main && git pull origin main
git checkout -b feat/my-change
# ... make changes ...
git push origin feat/my-change
# Open a PR → squash merge to main
Push to main triggers:
- Gitea Actions — lint → test → validate (see CI Pipeline below)
- Orca — automatic build + deploy (~3 min total)
Monitor status: https://gitea.meghsakha.com/Benjamin_Boenisch/breakpilot-compliance/actions
CI Pipeline
Defined in .gitea/workflows/ci.yaml.
| Job | What it checks |
|---|---|
loc-budget |
All source files ≤ 500 LOC; soft target 300 |
guardrail-integrity |
Commits touching guardrail files carry [guardrail-change] |
go-lint |
golangci-lint on ai-compliance-sdk/ |
python-lint |
ruff + mypy on Python services |
nodejs-lint |
tsc --noEmit + ESLint on Next.js services |
test-go-ai-compliance |
go test ./... in ai-compliance-sdk/ |
test-python-backend-compliance |
pytest in backend-compliance/ |
test-python-document-crawler |
pytest in document-crawler/ |
test-python-dsms-gateway |
pytest test_main.py in dsms-gateway/ |
sbom-scan |
License + vulnerability scan via syft + grype |
validate-canonical-controls |
OpenAPI contract baseline diff |
File Budget
| Limit | Value | How to check |
|---|---|---|
| Soft target | 300 LOC | bash scripts/check-loc.sh |
| Hard cap | 500 LOC | Same; also enforced by PreToolUse hook + git pre-commit + CI |
| Exceptions | .claude/rules/loc-exceptions.txt |
Require written rationale + [guardrail-change] commit marker |
The .claude/settings.json PreToolUse hook blocks Claude Code from writing or editing files that would exceed the hard cap. The git pre-commit hook re-checks. CI is the final gate.
Links
| URL | |
|---|---|
| Admin dashboard | https://admin-dev.breakpilot.ai |
| Developer portal | https://developers-dev.breakpilot.ai |
| Backend API | https://api-dev.breakpilot.ai |
| AI SDK API | https://sdk-dev.breakpilot.ai |
| Gitea repo | https://gitea.meghsakha.com/Benjamin_Boenisch/breakpilot-compliance |
| Gitea Actions | https://gitea.meghsakha.com/Benjamin_Boenisch/breakpilot-compliance/actions |