Benjamin Admin
80d62a0c5f
Background: hazard_patterns_extended.go (HP045-074) and _extended2.go (HP074-102) shared their entire ID range with the semantically-different patterns in hazard_patterns_cobot.go, hazard_patterns_press.go, hazard_patterns_operational.go and hazard_patterns_extended_dguv.go. The collision had lived unnoticed because TestGetBuiltinHazardPatterns_- UniqueIDs only checks the 44 builtin patterns (HP001-HP044). Examples of the collision: - HP059 = "Kollision Mensch-Roboter" (cobot.go) vs "Kupplung — mechanisch" (extended.go) - HP060 = "Quetschen durch Werkzeug am Cobot" (cobot.go) vs "Diagnosemodul — Software" (extended.go) - HP073 = "Wartung ohne LOTO" (operational.go) vs "Hydraulikventil — hydraulisch" (extended.go) At runtime collectAllPatterns() returned both patterns under the same ID which made downstream lookups (e.g. hazardPatternMeasures map keyed by pattern_id) non-deterministic — last-loaded wins, dropping the other pattern's mitigation set silently. Rename strategy (no deletes — both patterns are real and earn their SuggestedMeasureIDs after the category-filter work): extended.go HP045..HP073 -> HP1800..HP1828 (29 IDs) extended2.go HP074..HP102 -> HP1830..HP1858 (29 IDs) cobot/press/operational/extended_dguv keep their original IDs because: - compliance_triggers.go references HP059/HP060 with the cobot meaning - pattern_engine_test.go references HP073 with the LOTO/maintenance meaning - phase3_4_test.go references HP073 the same way New regression test: - TestAllPatterns_UniqueIDs runs over collectAllPatterns() and fails if ANY pattern in the runtime set duplicates an ID. The old TestGetBuiltinHazardPatterns_UniqueIDs stays for the builtin subset. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
breakpilot-compliance
DSGVO/AI-Act compliance platform — 10 services, Go · Python · TypeScript
Overview
breakpilot-compliance is a multi-tenant DSGVO/EU AI Act compliance platform that provides an SDK for consent management, data subject requests (DSR), audit logging, iACE impact assessments, and document archival. It ships as 10 containerised services covering an admin dashboard, a developer portal, a Python/FastAPI backend, a Go AI compliance engine, TTS, and a decentralised document store on IPFS. Every service is deployed automatically via Gitea Actions → Orca on every push to main.
Architecture
| Service | Tech | Port | Container |
|---|---|---|---|
| admin-compliance | Next.js 15 | 3007 | bp-compliance-admin |
| backend-compliance | Python / FastAPI 0.123 | 8002 | bp-compliance-backend |
| ai-compliance-sdk | Go 1.24 / Gin | 8093 | bp-compliance-ai-sdk |
| developer-portal | Next.js 15 | 3006 | bp-compliance-developer-portal |
| breakpilot-compliance-sdk | TypeScript SDK (React/Vue/Angular/vanilla) | — | — |
| consent-sdk | JS/TS Consent SDK | — | — |
| compliance-tts-service | Python / Piper TTS | 8095 | bp-compliance-tts |
| document-crawler | Python / FastAPI | 8098 | bp-compliance-document-crawler |
| dsms-gateway | Python / FastAPI / IPFS | 8082 | bp-compliance-dsms-gateway |
| dsms-node | IPFS Kubo v0.24.0 | — | bp-compliance-dsms-node |
All containers share the external breakpilot-network Docker network and depend on breakpilot-core (Valkey, Vault, RAG service, Nginx reverse proxy).
Quick Start
Prerequisites: Docker, Go 1.24+, Python 3.12+, Node.js 20+
git clone ssh://git@gitea.meghsakha.com:22222/Benjamin_Boenisch/breakpilot-compliance.git
cd breakpilot-compliance
# Copy and populate secrets (never commit .env)
cp .env.example .env
# Start all services
docker compose up -d
For the Orca/Hetzner production target (x86_64), use the override:
docker compose -f docker-compose.yml -f docker-compose.hetzner.yml up -d
Development Workflow
Use feature branches off main. Supported prefixes: feat/, feature/, hotfix/.
git checkout main && git pull origin main
git checkout -b feat/my-change
# ... make changes ...
git push origin feat/my-change
# Open a PR → squash merge to main
Push to main triggers:
- Gitea Actions — lint → test → validate (see CI Pipeline below)
- Orca — automatic build + deploy (~3 min total)
Monitor status: https://gitea.meghsakha.com/Benjamin_Boenisch/breakpilot-compliance/actions
CI Pipeline
Defined in .gitea/workflows/ci.yaml.
| Job | What it checks |
|---|---|
loc-budget |
All source files ≤ 500 LOC; soft target 300 |
guardrail-integrity |
Commits touching guardrail files carry [guardrail-change] |
go-lint |
golangci-lint on ai-compliance-sdk/ |
python-lint |
ruff + mypy on Python services |
nodejs-lint |
tsc --noEmit + ESLint on Next.js services |
test-go-ai-compliance |
go test ./... in ai-compliance-sdk/ |
test-python-backend-compliance |
pytest in backend-compliance/ |
test-python-document-crawler |
pytest in document-crawler/ |
test-python-dsms-gateway |
pytest test_main.py in dsms-gateway/ |
sbom-scan |
License + vulnerability scan via syft + grype |
validate-canonical-controls |
OpenAPI contract baseline diff |
File Budget
| Limit | Value | How to check |
|---|---|---|
| Soft target | 300 LOC | bash scripts/check-loc.sh |
| Hard cap | 500 LOC | Same; also enforced by PreToolUse hook + git pre-commit + CI |
| Exceptions | .claude/rules/loc-exceptions.txt |
Require written rationale + [guardrail-change] commit marker |
The .claude/settings.json PreToolUse hook blocks Claude Code from writing or editing files that would exceed the hard cap. The git pre-commit hook re-checks. CI is the final gate.
Links
| URL | |
|---|---|
| Admin dashboard | https://admin-dev.breakpilot.ai |
| Developer portal | https://developers-dev.breakpilot.ai |
| Backend API | https://api-dev.breakpilot.ai |
| AI SDK API | https://sdk-dev.breakpilot.ai |
| Gitea repo | https://gitea.meghsakha.com/Benjamin_Boenisch/breakpilot-compliance |
| Gitea Actions | https://gitea.meghsakha.com/Benjamin_Boenisch/breakpilot-compliance/actions |