Benjamin Admin 6c7d4c7552 fix(vvt): correct ePaaS schema mapping + category-aware scoring
The first BMW VVT table rendered all 24 providers at 20% score because
the ePaaS extractor was reading the wrong field names. Actual schema is
nested: providers[].processings[].persistences[], NOT providers[] alone.

Correct ePaaS schema (verified against bmw.com/epaas/.../de_DE.epaas.json):
  Provider:    {id, name, description, processings[]}
  Processing:  {id, name, description, categoryId, optOutLink,
                privacyPolicyLink, persistences[]}
  Persistence: {id, name, domain, type, expiry, description}

Two structural changes:

1. One row per processing (not provider). BMW has 26 providers but ~91
   processings spread across them (Adobe alone has ACMProcessing,
   AdobeAnalytics, AdobeCampaign, AdobeTargetAnalytics, AdobeTargetPers.).
   The cookie widget displays each processing separately — VVT now
   mirrors that. Display name format: 'Provider Name — Processing Name'.

2. Read optOutLink/privacyPolicyLink from PROCESSING (where they live),
   not provider. Persistences flatten to cookies[] with name + expiry +
   description.

Plus category mapping:
  advertising -> marketing
  strictlyNecessary -> necessary
  statistics -> statistics
  functional -> functional

Category-aware scoring (cookie_link_validator.score_vendors):
- 'necessary' (technisch erforderliche, §25 Abs. 2 TDDDG): no opt-out
  required, no country required. Score weight shifts to purpose +
  cookie disclosure (essential cookies must list names + expiry).
- All other categories: opt-out URL still mandatory; missing opt-out
  flags 'no_opt_out_url' and zeros that block of points.

Expected BMW result after this fix:
- ~91 rows (Adobe Analytics, Adform Retargeting, Akamai Infrastructure,
  AWS, ..., plus ~60 strictlyNecessary processings)
- Marketing rows with present opt-out → ~75-90%
- Necessary rows with cookie+expiry → ~85-95%
- Rows missing fields → still flagged
2026-05-17 11:19:31 +02:00

breakpilot-compliance

DSGVO/AI-Act compliance platform — 10 services, Go · Python · TypeScript

CI Go Python Node.js TypeScript FastAPI DSGVO AI Act LOC guard Services


Overview

breakpilot-compliance is a multi-tenant DSGVO/EU AI Act compliance platform that provides an SDK for consent management, data subject requests (DSR), audit logging, iACE impact assessments, and document archival. It ships as 10 containerised services covering an admin dashboard, a developer portal, a Python/FastAPI backend, a Go AI compliance engine, TTS, and a decentralised document store on IPFS. Every service is deployed automatically via Gitea Actions → Orca on every push to main.


Architecture

Service Tech Port Container
admin-compliance Next.js 15 3007 bp-compliance-admin
backend-compliance Python / FastAPI 0.123 8002 bp-compliance-backend
ai-compliance-sdk Go 1.24 / Gin 8093 bp-compliance-ai-sdk
developer-portal Next.js 15 3006 bp-compliance-developer-portal
breakpilot-compliance-sdk TypeScript SDK (React/Vue/Angular/vanilla)
consent-sdk JS/TS Consent SDK
compliance-tts-service Python / Piper TTS 8095 bp-compliance-tts
document-crawler Python / FastAPI 8098 bp-compliance-document-crawler
dsms-gateway Python / FastAPI / IPFS 8082 bp-compliance-dsms-gateway
dsms-node IPFS Kubo v0.24.0 bp-compliance-dsms-node

All containers share the external breakpilot-network Docker network and depend on breakpilot-core (Valkey, Vault, RAG service, Nginx reverse proxy).


Quick Start

Prerequisites: Docker, Go 1.24+, Python 3.12+, Node.js 20+

git clone ssh://git@gitea.meghsakha.com:22222/Benjamin_Boenisch/breakpilot-compliance.git
cd breakpilot-compliance

# Copy and populate secrets (never commit .env)
cp .env.example .env

# Start all services
docker compose up -d

For the Orca/Hetzner production target (x86_64), use the override:

docker compose -f docker-compose.yml -f docker-compose.hetzner.yml up -d

Development Workflow

Use feature branches off main. Supported prefixes: feat/, feature/, hotfix/.

git checkout main && git pull origin main
git checkout -b feat/my-change
# ... make changes ...
git push origin feat/my-change
# Open a PR → squash merge to main

Push to main triggers:

  1. Gitea Actions — lint → test → validate (see CI Pipeline below)
  2. Orca — automatic build + deploy (~3 min total)

Monitor status: https://gitea.meghsakha.com/Benjamin_Boenisch/breakpilot-compliance/actions


CI Pipeline

Defined in .gitea/workflows/ci.yaml.

Job What it checks
loc-budget All source files ≤ 500 LOC; soft target 300
guardrail-integrity Commits touching guardrail files carry [guardrail-change]
go-lint golangci-lint on ai-compliance-sdk/
python-lint ruff + mypy on Python services
nodejs-lint tsc --noEmit + ESLint on Next.js services
test-go-ai-compliance go test ./... in ai-compliance-sdk/
test-python-backend-compliance pytest in backend-compliance/
test-python-document-crawler pytest in document-crawler/
test-python-dsms-gateway pytest test_main.py in dsms-gateway/
sbom-scan License + vulnerability scan via syft + grype
validate-canonical-controls OpenAPI contract baseline diff

File Budget

Limit Value How to check
Soft target 300 LOC bash scripts/check-loc.sh
Hard cap 500 LOC Same; also enforced by PreToolUse hook + git pre-commit + CI
Exceptions .claude/rules/loc-exceptions.txt Require written rationale + [guardrail-change] commit marker

The .claude/settings.json PreToolUse hook blocks Claude Code from writing or editing files that would exceed the hard cap. The git pre-commit hook re-checks. CI is the final gate.


URL
Admin dashboard https://admin-dev.breakpilot.ai
Developer portal https://developers-dev.breakpilot.ai
Backend API https://api-dev.breakpilot.ai
AI SDK API https://sdk-dev.breakpilot.ai
Gitea repo https://gitea.meghsakha.com/Benjamin_Boenisch/breakpilot-compliance
Gitea Actions https://gitea.meghsakha.com/Benjamin_Boenisch/breakpilot-compliance/actions
S
Description
No description provided
Readme 25 MiB
Languages
TypeScript 43.1%
Python 30.8%
Go 23.5%
Shell 1.2%
PLpgSQL 0.8%
Other 0.3%