9 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Benjamin Admin	4818fc51c2	fix(ucca): guidance-intent erkennt direkt benannte Guidance-Dokumente ... queryWantsGuidance verfehlte rein dokument-namige Fragen ("Welche Kriterien nennt WP248 ...", "Was sagt GL 07/2020 ..."): guidanceIntentSignals enthielt zwar Herausgeber (edpb/dsk/enisa) und Verben (empfiehlt/laut), aber keine Working-Paper-/Guideline-Identifier. Dadurch loeste der Authority-Lift nicht aus -> binding_law (bzw. im homogenen Korpus sogar off-domain MaschVO/CRA) verdraengte die Guidance aus den Top-K. Fix: WP2xx / GL 0x / "working paper" als Guidance-Signal ergaenzt. Generisch ueber alle WP-/GL-Dokumente, KEINE doc-spezifische Regel (Query->Intent, nicht Query->konkretes Dokument). Validierung (homogener Build-Korpus, bge-m3 + Qdrant Cosine): - 10 Hard Cases: 8/10 -> 10/10 (WP248/WP260 zurueck in Top-8) - ComplianceBench-100: 0/100 Norm-Fragen veraendert (Freeze-Regression gruen), 18/18 Guidance-Intent-Fragen verbessert (binding -> korrekte Guidance-Klasse) - Hybrid == Dense (Keyword-RRF war NICHT die Ursache, der Lift-Gate war es) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-06-29 20:22:27 +02:00
Benjamin Admin	623d80b6c8	fix(ai-sdk): national-law subsidiarity in authority rerank (DSGVO > BDSG for general questions) ... The authority reranker (wired in legal_rag_client.go:168) had no national-subsidiarity dimension, so a general BDSG paragraph could outrank the primary DSGVO article. Surfaced by the KB-2026.1 BDSG pilot (dp_05/08/11 + cr_07). - authorityScore: DE binding_law in an EU-primary domain WITHOUT a co-primary topic match -> soft demote (subsidiarityPen 0.18), not exclusion. National special rules stay co-primary via the topic ontology (DSB Art.37+§38, special categories Art.9+§22, ...). - queryDomain: fall back to a regulation-name mention (DSGVO/BDSG/CRA) so a question phrased around the act is domain-scoped even without a topical keyword (fixes cr_07: BDSG Teil-3 §64). - data_protection keyword stem 'auftragsverarbeit' (catches Auftragsverarbeitungsvertrag). Pure ranking logic, no data manipulation; soft demotes keep national rules visible. Build result (DSGVO+BDSG): degraded=0, must_not=0. go build/vet/test ./... green; 6 new table tests. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-06-26 21:28:12 +02:00
Benjamin_Boenisch	9cfe6f83b1	feat(ai-sdk): source_role control-pool (controls != only technical_standard) (#38)	2026-06-24 11:12:22 +00:00
Benjamin_Boenisch	df7966656a	feat(ai-sdk): classify NIST/OWASP/Grundschutz as technical_standard (#37)	2026-06-24 10:15:17 +00:00
Benjamin_Boenisch	05d75e8039	feat(ai-sdk): control-intent — technical_standard may win implementation questions (#36)	2026-06-24 09:58:35 +00:00
Benjamin_Boenisch	e24a551ee4	fix(ai-sdk): make interpretation-intent override reliably win (#35)	2026-06-24 09:31:58 +00:00
Benjamin_Boenisch	f11b2e035f	feat(ai-sdk): controlled interpretation-intent guidance override (#34)	2026-06-24 09:01:25 +00:00
Benjamin_Boenisch	230dc05287	feat(ai-sdk): legal-corpus coverage + Phase-2 citation-graph assessment (#33)	2026-06-24 06:37:22 +00:00
Benjamin_Boenisch	a1f425d43a	feat(ai-sdk): authority-aware re-ranking for legal RAG (Phase 1) (#31)	2026-06-23 09:30:52 +00:00