feat(ai-sdk): control-intent — technical_standard may win implementation questions #36

Merged

Benjamin_Boenisch merged 1 commits from feat/control-intent into main 2026-06-24 09:58:35 +00:00

Conversation 0 Commits 1 Files Changed 2

+114 -29

Benjamin_Boenisch commented 2026-06-24 09:49:54 +00:00

Owner

Copy Link

Copy Source

Mirrors the guidance intent (#35) for technical_standard. Control/implementation questions (welche Controls/Maßnahmen passen, härten, NIST, OWASP, Grundschutz) lift a competitive technical_standard above binding; norm questions (Anforderungen) keep binding Top-1. Generalizes applyGuidanceIntent → liftAboveBinding(sourceClass). Schritt 2 von 4 (Control-Intent → NIST/OWASP-Ingest → Gate-Test).

Mirrors the guidance intent (#35) for technical_standard. Control/implementation questions (welche Controls/Maßnahmen passen, härten, NIST, OWASP, Grundschutz) lift a competitive technical_standard above binding; norm questions (Anforderungen) keep binding Top-1. Generalizes applyGuidanceIntent → liftAboveBinding(sourceClass). Schritt 2 von 4 (Control-Intent → NIST/OWASP-Ingest → Gate-Test).

Benjamin_Boenisch added 1 commit 2026-06-24 09:49:56 +00:00

feat(ai-sdk): control-intent — technical_standard may win implementation questions ... a5b675d999

Mirror the guidance interpretation-intent (PR #35) for control frameworks: when a
query explicitly asks HOW to implement / which controls or measures fit (control,
maßnahme, umsetzen, härten, nist, owasp, grundschutz, ...), a semantically
competitive technical_standard is lifted just above the best binding hit — so
"Welche Controls passen zu Security Updates?" can return NIST/OWASP Top-1, while
"Welche Anforderungen bestehen an Security Updates?" keeps CRA (binding) Top-1.

Generalize applyGuidanceIntent -> liftAboveBinding(sourceClass) and reuse it for
both supervisory_guidance (interpretation intent) and technical_standard
(implementation intent). Same semantic guard keeps off-topic sources demoted.
Rename the shared coefficients guidanceIntent* -> intentLift*.

Tested: queryWantsControls detection + 3 rerank cases (standard wins on control
question, binding stays on norm question, off-topic standard blocked by guard).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Benjamin_Boenisch merged commit 05d75e8039 into main 2026-06-24 09:58:35 +00:00

Benjamin_Boenisch referenced this pull request 2026-06-24 10:11:09 +00:00

feat(ai-sdk): classify NIST/OWASP/Grundschutz as technical_standard #37

Benjamin_Boenisch referenced this issue from a commit 2026-06-24 10:11:09 +00:00

feat(ai-sdk): classify technical standards (NIST/OWASP/Grundschutz) as technical_standard

Sign in to join this conversation.

Reviewers

No Reviewers

Labels

Clear labels

config

Env vars, secrets management, startup validation

data-integrity

Transactions, indexes, pagination

frontend

Next.js, client-side concerns

observability

Logging, audit trails, health checks

reliability

Error handling, retries, circuit breakers

security

Auth, secrets, injection, tenant isolation

severity: critical

System-level risk, data breach or full outage

severity: high

Significant risk, must fix before go-live

severity: medium

Important but not blocking go-live

testing

Test coverage, integration tests

No Label

Milestone

No items

No Milestone

Projects

Clear projects

No project

Assignees

Clear assignees

sharang (Sharang Parnerkar) Benjamin_Boenisch

No Assignees

1 Participants

Notifications

Subscribe

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: Benjamin_Boenisch/breakpilot-compliance#36