feat(ai-sdk): controlled interpretation-intent guidance override #34

Merged

Benjamin_Boenisch merged 1 commits from feat/interpretation-intent into main 2026-06-24 09:01:26 +00:00

Conversation 0 Commits 1 Files Changed 2

+133 -10

Benjamin_Boenisch commented 2026-06-24 08:51:06 +00:00

Owner

Copy Link

Copy Source

Bounded guidance override on explicit interpretation intent (EDPB/DSK/ENISA/BSI/Leitlinie/Auslegung/empfiehlt/sagt/laut) + semantic guard (guidance_sem >= best_binding - 0.05). Norm questions unchanged (binding Top-1). Gate verified on dev (4/4). Closes the #24 interpretation-intent piece + makes Parser 3 (GuidanceIngester) production-ready.

Bounded guidance override on explicit interpretation intent (EDPB/DSK/ENISA/BSI/Leitlinie/Auslegung/empfiehlt/sagt/laut) + semantic guard (guidance_sem >= best_binding - 0.05). Norm questions unchanged (binding Top-1). Gate verified on dev (4/4). Closes the #24 interpretation-intent piece + makes Parser 3 (GuidanceIngester) production-ready.

Benjamin_Boenisch added 1 commit 2026-06-24 08:51:08 +00:00

feat(ai-sdk): controlled interpretation-intent guidance override ... ae73904ad5

The authority re-rank always ranked binding law above guidance, so a guideline
could never be Top-1 even when the user explicitly asked "what does the EDPB /
ENISA say?". Add a tightly-bounded override: only when the query carries an
explicit guidance signal (EDPB / DSK / ENISA / BSI / Leitlinie / Guideline /
Orientierungshilfe / Auslegung / empfiehlt / Empfehlung / sagt / laut) AND the
guideline is semantically competitive with the best binding hit (>= best_binding
- 0.05) does supervisory_guidance get a +0.25 boost that lets it overtake the
binding norm. Obligation questions (no signal) are unchanged: binding stays #1.

Gate verified on dev:
- "Ab wann DSB-Pflicht?"                  -> Art. 37 DSGVO (binding) Top-1
- "Was empfiehlt der EDPB zum DSB?"       -> EDPB guidance Top-1
- "Was sagt die ENISA zu Security Updates?" -> ENISA guidance Top-1
- "Welche Anforderungen an Security Updates?" -> Art. 13 CRA (binding) Top-1

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Benjamin_Boenisch merged commit f11b2e035f into main 2026-06-24 09:01:26 +00:00

Benjamin_Boenisch referenced this issue from a commit 2026-06-24 09:22:00 +00:00

fix(ai-sdk): make interpretation-intent override reliably win

Benjamin_Boenisch referenced this pull request 2026-06-24 09:22:01 +00:00

fix(ai-sdk): make interpretation-intent override reliably win #35

Sign in to join this conversation.

Reviewers

No Reviewers

Labels

Clear labels

config

Env vars, secrets management, startup validation

data-integrity

Transactions, indexes, pagination

frontend

Next.js, client-side concerns

observability

Logging, audit trails, health checks

reliability

Error handling, retries, circuit breakers

security

Auth, secrets, injection, tenant isolation

severity: critical

System-level risk, data breach or full outage

severity: high

Significant risk, must fix before go-live

severity: medium

Important but not blocking go-live

testing

Test coverage, integration tests

No Label

Milestone

No items

No Milestone

Projects

Clear projects

No project

Assignees

Clear assignees

sharang (Sharang Parnerkar) Benjamin_Boenisch

No Assignees

1 Participants

Notifications

Subscribe

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: Benjamin_Boenisch/breakpilot-compliance#34