Compare commits

..
Author SHA1 Message Date
Sharang ParnerkarandClaude Fable 5 82ed4afd10 feat(controls): B2 — grounded surface checks for absence-based CRA controls
CI / Check (push) Skipped
CI / Check (pull_request) Successful in 5m44s
CI / Detect Changes (pull_request) Skipped
CI / Deploy Agent (pull_request) Skipped
CI / Deploy Dashboard (pull_request) Skipped
CI / Deploy Docs (pull_request) Skipped
CI / Deploy MCP (pull_request) Skipped
Second slice of B (hybrid coverage): the controls violated by an *absence*
(no rate limiting, no security logging, no update-signature check) have no
syntactic pattern for semgrep, so we retrieve the code surface each governs and
let the grounded judge decide whether the control holds.

- controls/surface.rs: deterministic, bounded surface retrieval (keyword +
  window, capped per control) for cra-ai-6,11,24,27,28,29,30.
- grounded_surface_findings(): retrieve surfaces -> GroundedControlChecker ->
  net-new findings, each already tagged with its control and grounded to a real
  snippet (ground() drops anything not quoting verbatim code).
- orchestrator Stage 5d, gated on breakpilot.grounded_control_checks
  (BREAKPILOT_GROUNDED_CHECKS, default off) — absence detection is the least
  deterministic path, kept off until tuned against live scans.
- LUT: the 7 controls' notes now point to the gated grounded mechanism (kept
  needs_tooling; coverage stays honest until live-validated).

Local validation (real Qwen, temp 0), correct positive+negative discrimination:
  cra-ai-11 unprotected login  -> violates, CWE-307, grounded; protected -> false
  cra-ai-24 unlogged admin del -> violates, CWE-778, grounded; logged   -> false

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-21 14:41:22 +02:00
7 changed files with 19 additions and 256 deletions
+3 -12
View File
@@ -234,22 +234,13 @@ pub async fn semantic_stamp_findings(
let Some(region) = fetch_region(repo_path, &file, line) else {
continue;
};
// Retrieve on the finding's intent + the code, not the region alone: two
// findings in one file share overlapping windows and otherwise embed alike,
// collapsing onto the same controls. The finding's title/description carry
// the discriminating signal (e.g. "brute-force protection" vs "weak hash").
// The raw `region` still goes to the judge for snippet grounding.
let query = format!(
"{}\n{}\n\n{}",
finding.title, finding.description, region.content
);
let query_emb = match llm.embed(vec![query]).await {
let region_emb = match llm.embed(vec![region.content.clone()]).await {
Ok(mut embs) => match embs.pop() {
Some(v) => v,
None => continue,
},
Err(e) => {
tracing::warn!(error = %e, "query embed failed; skipping finding");
tracing::warn!(error = %e, "region embed failed; skipping finding");
continue;
}
};
@@ -257,7 +248,7 @@ pub async fn semantic_stamp_findings(
.check(
&index,
&region,
&query_emb,
&region_emb,
SEMANTIC_TOP_K,
&finding.repo_id,
)
+5 -7
View File
@@ -22,20 +22,18 @@ impl<J: ControlJudge> SemanticControlChecker<J> {
Self { judge }
}
/// Map a code region to the controls it violates. `query_embedding` is the
/// caller-supplied retrieval embedding — typically the finding's intent
/// (title/description) plus the region, so retrieval keys on what the finding
/// is *about*, not just the ambient code. The top-`k` nearest controls in
/// `index` are then judged against the raw `region` and grounded.
/// Map a code region to the controls it violates. `region_embedding` is the
/// region's embedding (the caller computes it via the LLM); the top-`k`
/// nearest controls in `index` are judged and grounded.
pub async fn check(
&self,
index: &ControlIndex,
region: &CandidateRegion,
query_embedding: &[f64],
region_embedding: &[f64],
k: usize,
repo_id: &str,
) -> Vec<Finding> {
let candidates = index.nearest(query_embedding, k);
let candidates = index.nearest(region_embedding, k);
let mut findings = Vec::new();
for spec in &candidates {
let verdict = self.judge.judge(spec, region).await;
+1 -13
View File
@@ -47,17 +47,6 @@ pub const SURFACES: &[Surface] = &[
"ratelimit",
],
},
Surface {
control_id: "cra-ai-12", // Rollenbasierte Autorisierung (RBAC)
terms: &[
"authorize",
"permission",
"role",
"rbac",
"require_role",
"has_role",
],
},
Surface {
control_id: "cra-ai-24", // Security-Logging
terms: &["login", "authorize", "permission", "role", "admin", "audit"],
@@ -207,11 +196,10 @@ mod tests {
#[test]
fn surfaces_cover_the_absence_based_controls() {
assert_eq!(SURFACES.len(), 8);
assert_eq!(SURFACES.len(), 7);
for id in [
"cra-ai-6",
"cra-ai-11",
"cra-ai-12",
"cra-ai-24",
"cra-ai-27",
"cra-ai-28",
+1 -49
View File
@@ -22,11 +22,6 @@ struct EmbeddingData {
index: usize,
}
/// Max inputs per embedding request. The bge/OpenAI-like backends cap the input
/// array (bge-multilingual-gemma2 rejects >25 with "batch size overflow"), so we
/// chunk larger corpora — a whole control catalog (~1.8k) would otherwise 500.
const EMBED_BATCH_SIZE: usize = 16;
// ── Embedding implementation ───────────────────────────────────
impl LlmClient {
@@ -34,21 +29,8 @@ impl LlmClient {
&self.embed_model
}
/// Generate embeddings for a batch of texts, chunking into backend-sized
/// requests and preserving input order across chunks.
/// Generate embeddings for a batch of texts
pub async fn embed(&self, texts: Vec<String>) -> Result<Vec<Vec<f64>>, AgentError> {
if texts.is_empty() {
return Ok(Vec::new());
}
let mut out = Vec::with_capacity(texts.len());
for chunk in texts.chunks(EMBED_BATCH_SIZE) {
out.extend(self.embed_batch(chunk.to_vec()).await?);
}
Ok(out)
}
/// Embed one backend-sized batch (≤ [`EMBED_BATCH_SIZE`]) in a single request.
async fn embed_batch(&self, texts: Vec<String>) -> Result<Vec<Vec<f64>>, AgentError> {
let url = format!("{}/v1/embeddings", self.base_url.trim_end_matches('/'));
let request_body = EmbeddingRequest {
@@ -90,33 +72,3 @@ impl LlmClient {
Ok(data.into_iter().map(|d| d.embedding).collect())
}
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
use secrecy::SecretString;
fn client() -> LlmClient {
LlmClient::new(
"http://unused".into(),
SecretString::from(String::new()),
"m".into(),
"e".into(),
)
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn empty_input_makes_no_request() {
// Must short-circuit before any HTTP call (base_url is unroutable).
let out = client().embed(Vec::new()).await.unwrap();
assert!(out.is_empty());
}
#[test]
fn batch_size_is_within_backend_cap() {
assert!(
EMBED_BATCH_SIZE <= 25,
"must stay under the bge 25-input cap"
);
}
}
-145
View File
@@ -1,145 +0,0 @@
//! C5 live verification — the semantic master-controls path end to end against the
//! deployed api-dev catalog. Ignored (hits api-dev + LiteLLM). Run explicitly:
//!
//! set -a; . ./.env; set +a
//! BREAKPILOT_BASE_URL=https://api-dev.breakpilot.ai \
//! cargo test -p compliance-agent --test c5_semantic_live -- --ignored --nocapture
//!
//! Pulls the live master-controls catalog, embeds the corpus (chunked), then for a
//! couple of real vulnerable findings retrieves the nearest master controls and
//! grounded-judges them, stamping master-control refs.
mod common;
use std::sync::Arc;
use compliance_agent::llm::LlmClient;
use compliance_core::config::BreakpilotConfig;
use compliance_core::models::finding::{Finding, Severity};
use compliance_core::models::scan::ScanType;
use secrecy::SecretString;
fn env(k: &str) -> String {
std::env::var(k).unwrap_or_else(|_| panic!("env {k} must be set for the live C5 test"))
}
fn mk_finding(file: &str, line: u32, title: &str) -> Finding {
let mut f = Finding::new(
"repo-c5".into(),
format!("{file}:{line}"),
"semgrep".into(),
ScanType::Sast,
title.into(),
title.into(),
Severity::High,
);
f.file_path = Some(file.into());
f.line_number = Some(line);
f
}
#[tokio::test]
#[ignore = "live: requires deployed api-dev master-controls (fetch+parse only, no LLM)"]
async fn c5_ingest_master_controls_catalog() {
use compliance_agent::controls::OscalControlsProvider;
let provider = OscalControlsProvider::new(
reqwest::Client::new(),
env("BREAKPILOT_BASE_URL"),
None,
std::env::temp_dir().join("c5-ingest-snap"),
);
let doc = provider
.load_master_controls()
.await
.expect("pull + parse master-controls catalog");
let controls = doc.to_controls();
println!(
"\n=== C5 ingest: {} master controls parsed ===",
controls.len()
);
for c in controls.iter().take(4) {
let text: String = c.text.chars().take(90).collect();
println!(" {} | {} | {}", c.id, c.title, text);
}
assert!(
!controls.is_empty(),
"expected a non-empty master-control corpus"
);
}
#[tokio::test]
#[ignore = "live: requires deployed api-dev master-controls + LiteLLM"]
async fn c5_semantic_stamps_master_control_refs() {
let llm = Arc::new(LlmClient::new(
env("LITELLM_URL"),
SecretString::from(env("LITELLM_API_KEY")),
env("LITELLM_MODEL"),
env("LITELLM_EMBED_MODEL"),
));
let mut config = common::dev_config("mongodb://unused".into(), "c5".into());
let snapshot = std::env::temp_dir().join("c5-oscal-snap");
config.breakpilot = BreakpilotConfig {
base_url: Some(env("BREAKPILOT_BASE_URL")),
token: None,
snapshot_dir: snapshot.to_string_lossy().into_owned(),
semantic_mapping: true,
grounded_control_checks: false,
};
// Fixture repo with recognizable code-checkable surfaces.
let repo = std::env::temp_dir().join("c5-fixture-repo");
let _ = std::fs::remove_dir_all(&repo);
std::fs::create_dir_all(repo.join("app")).expect("mkdir");
std::fs::write(
repo.join("app/auth.py"),
concat!(
"import hashlib\n",
"\n",
"def store_password(user, password):\n",
" # weak, unsalted password hashing\n",
" digest = hashlib.md5(password.encode()).hexdigest()\n",
" db.save(user, digest)\n",
"\n",
"@app.route('/login', methods=['POST'])\n",
"def login():\n",
" u = request.form['username']\n",
" p = request.form['password']\n",
" return 'ok' if check(u, p) else ('bad', 401)\n",
),
)
.expect("write fixture");
let mut findings = vec![
mk_finding("app/auth.py", 5, "Weak password hash (md5, unsalted)"),
mk_finding(
"app/auth.py",
9,
"Login endpoint without brute-force protection",
),
];
let tagged =
compliance_agent::controls::semantic_stamp_findings(&config, llm, &repo, &mut findings)
.await;
println!("\n=== C5 semantic master-controls stamping ===");
for f in &findings {
println!(
" {:50} {}:{:?} -> {:?}",
f.title,
f.file_path.as_deref().unwrap_or(""),
f.line_number,
f.control_refs
);
}
println!("findings that gained >=1 master-control ref: {tagged}");
let _ = std::fs::remove_dir_all(&repo);
// Live corpus — assert only that the path runs and stamps at least one ref.
assert!(
tagged >= 1,
"expected at least one finding to gain a master-control ref"
);
}
+9 -9
View File
@@ -25,29 +25,29 @@
"control": "cra-ai-2",
"title": "Minimale Angriffsflaeche",
"scans": [],
"note": "design property (minimal attack surface) — not derivable from local code patterns; architecture/threat-model review",
"status": "not_code_checkable"
"note": "code-checkable but no off-the-shelf tool digs it out — author a detector (custom semgrep rule / check)",
"status": "needs_tooling"
},
{
"control": "cra-ai-3",
"title": "Sichere Systemarchitektur",
"scans": [],
"note": "design property (secure system architecture) — architecture review, not statically code-checkable",
"status": "not_code_checkable"
"note": "code-checkable but no off-the-shelf tool digs it out — author a detector (custom semgrep rule / check)",
"status": "needs_tooling"
},
{
"control": "cra-ai-4",
"title": "Least-Privilege-Prinzip",
"scans": [],
"note": "design property (least-privilege) — deployment/IAM & architecture review, not a local code pattern",
"status": "not_code_checkable"
"note": "code-checkable but no off-the-shelf tool digs it out — author a detector (custom semgrep rule / check)",
"status": "needs_tooling"
},
{
"control": "cra-ai-5",
"title": "Manipulationsschutz",
"scans": [],
"note": "design property (tamper protection) — hardware/runtime & operational control, not statically code-checkable",
"status": "not_code_checkable"
"note": "code-checkable but no off-the-shelf tool digs it out — author a detector (custom semgrep rule / check)",
"status": "needs_tooling"
},
{
"control": "cra-ai-6",
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@
"control": "cra-ai-12",
"title": "Rollenbasierte Autorisierung",
"scans": [],
"note": "absence-based — no syntactic pattern; covered by the grounded surface check (retrieve surface + LLM judge), gated (BREAKPILOT_GROUNDED_CHECKS) pending live tuning",
"note": "code-checkable but no off-the-shelf tool digs it out — author a detector (custom semgrep rule / check)",
"status": "needs_tooling"
},
{
-21
View File
@@ -214,27 +214,6 @@ mod tests {
assert!(hits.iter().any(|c| c.control == "cra-ai-1"));
}
#[test]
fn coverage_reflects_the_b_track_split() {
let s = ControlMap::cra().unwrap().summary();
// 9 already tool-covered + B1's 4 custom-semgrep controls.
assert_eq!(s.covered, 13);
// The 8 grounded surface controls stay needs_tooling until live-tuned.
assert_eq!(s.needs_tooling, 8);
// B3 marked the 4 pure-architectural controls not code-checkable.
assert_eq!(s.not_code_checkable, 19);
}
#[test]
fn architectural_controls_are_not_code_checkable() {
let map = ControlMap::cra().unwrap();
for id in ["cra-ai-2", "cra-ai-3", "cra-ai-4", "cra-ai-5"] {
let c = map.coverage(id).unwrap();
assert_eq!(c.status, Coverage::NotCodeCheckable, "{id}");
assert!(c.scans.is_empty(), "{id} should carry no scan bindings");
}
}
#[test]
fn custom_rule_controls_do_not_bind_by_broad_cwe() {
let map = ControlMap::cra().unwrap();