Files
breakpilot-compliance/ai-compliance-sdk/internal/ucca/control_role.go
T
Benjamin Admin 31222885b3 feat(ai-sdk): control-intent result diversity + standard-name classifier override
On an implementation question impl_guidance (ENISA) keeps its earned semantic
Top-1, but the top-K now surfaces the best operational_requirement and
control_standard from the pool (ensureControlDiversity) — so different source
roles are visible instead of one role flooding the list, without forcing the
binding sources to Top-1.

A recognised standard NAME (NIST/OWASP/ISO 27001/CIS/CSA CCM/Grundschutz) now
overrides a mis-applied supervisory_guidance source_class in classifyAuthority,
so those standards classify and rank as technical_standard (control_standard
role). The corpus tags many standards as guidance (weight 70); the name wins.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-25 01:54:36 +02:00

175 lines
7.1 KiB
Go

package ucca
import "strings"
// source_role is the FUNCTIONAL role of a chunk — WHAT must be done (obligation),
// HOW to implement it (operational/procedural requirement, control standard,
// implementation guidance), or how to READ the norm (interpretation/definition).
// It is ORTHOGONAL to source_class (legal authority): source_class decides RANK,
// source_role decides CONTROL-POOL membership for implementation questions.
// Derived deterministically from markers, so the untagged corpus needs no re-tag.
const (
roleObligation = "obligation" // the abstract duty (the WHAT)
roleOperationalReq = "operational_requirement" // concrete binding requirement (CRA Annex I)
roleProceduralReq = "procedural_requirement" // a process: notification/registration/DPIA/incident report
roleControlStandard = "control_standard" // best-practice control catalog (NIST/OWASP/ISO/CIS)
roleImplGuidance = "implementation_guidance" // advisory how-to (ENISA good practices, BSI)
roleInterpretation = "interpretation" // interprets the norm's MEANING (EDPB guideline)
roleDefinition = "definition" // definitions / scope / recitals
)
var (
proceduralMarkers = []string{
"Meldung", "Meldepflicht", "Notification", "Notifizierung", "Registrierung",
"Registration", "Konformitätserklärung", "Declaration of Conformity", "Incident",
"Berichterstattung", "Reporting", "Folgenabschätzung", "DSFA", "DPIA", "Anzeigepflicht",
}
annexMarkers = []string{"Anhang", "Annex", "Appendix", "Anlage"}
operationalMarkers = []string{"Anforderung", "Requirement", "essential", "wesentliche"}
implMarkers = []string{
"Good Practice", "Best Practice", "Standards Mapping", "Umsetzung", "Implementation",
"Handreichung", "Maßnahmenkatalog", "ICS", "SCADA", "Technical Guideline", "TIG",
}
definitionMarkers = []string{"Begriffsbestimmung", "Definition"}
)
// classifyRole derives the functional source_role from chunk metadata + the authority
// class. technical_standard is always a control_standard; guidance splits into
// implementation_guidance (how-to) vs interpretation (meaning); binding splits into
// procedural / operational requirement / definition / plain obligation.
func classifyRole(r LegalSearchResult) string {
cls := classifyAuthority(r).sourceClass
hay := strings.ToLower(r.ArticleLabel + " " + r.RegulationShort + " " + r.RegulationName + " " + r.Article)
switch {
case r.IsRecital:
return roleDefinition
case cls == "technical_standard":
return roleControlStandard
case cls == "supervisory_guidance":
if containsAnyLower(hay, implMarkers) {
return roleImplGuidance
}
return roleInterpretation
case cls == "binding_law":
switch {
case containsAnyLower(hay, definitionMarkers):
return roleDefinition
case containsAnyLower(hay, proceduralMarkers):
return roleProceduralReq
case containsAnyLower(hay, annexMarkers) || containsAnyLower(hay, operationalMarkers):
return roleOperationalReq
default:
return roleObligation
}
default:
return roleObligation
}
}
// controlRoleBonus is the soft intra-pool preference (User 2026-06-24):
// operational_requirement > procedural_requirement > control_standard > implementation_guidance.
var controlRoleBonus = map[string]float64{
roleOperationalReq: 0.100,
roleProceduralReq: 0.075,
roleControlStandard: 0.050,
roleImplGuidance: 0.000,
}
// controlPoolGain lifts EVERY control-pool role over the non-control roles (obligation/
// interpretation/definition) on an implementation question, so the binding abstract
// obligation does not dominate by authority alone. The obligation is not removed — it
// stays visible as "Rechtsgrundlage" context below the recommended measures.
const controlPoolGain = 0.15
// applyControlRoles boosts the control-pool (the four implementation roles) for an
// EXPLICIT implementation question, soft-ordered op_req > procedural > standard > guidance.
// Replaces the earlier "lift technical_standard above binding" — controls are not only
// technical_standard, and the binding operational_requirement (e.g. CRA Annex I) should win.
func applyControlRoles(out []LegalSearchResult) {
for i := range out {
if bonus, ok := controlRoleBonus[classifyRole(out[i])]; ok {
out[i].Score += controlPoolGain + bonus
}
}
}
// isControlPoolRole reports whether a role belongs to the control-pool surfaced on
// implementation questions (the four "how to implement" roles).
func isControlPoolRole(role string) bool {
switch role {
case roleOperationalReq, roleProceduralReq, roleControlStandard, roleImplGuidance:
return true
}
return false
}
// controlRoleOf classifies a raw Qdrant payload into a source_role, so searchControls can
// filter its deep dense pull to the control-pool BEFORE hits are mapped to LegalSearchResult.
func controlRoleOf(payload map[string]interface{}) string {
article := getString(payload, "article")
if article == "" {
article = getString(payload, "section")
}
return classifyRole(LegalSearchResult{
RegulationShort: getString(payload, "regulation_short"),
RegulationName: getString(payload, "regulation_name_de"),
ArticleLabel: getString(payload, "article_label"),
Article: article,
Category: getString(payload, "category"),
SourceClass: getString(payload, "source_class"),
AuthorityWeight: getInt(payload, "authority_weight"),
IsRecital: getBool(payload, "is_recital"),
})
}
// ensureControlDiversity guarantees that the returned top-K of a control question surfaces at
// least one operational_requirement and one control_standard WHEN the pool contains them —
// without forcing them to Top-1. implementation_guidance (e.g. ENISA good practices) keeps its
// earned semantic lead; the rule only promotes the best hit of a missing control role into the
// top-K by overwriting the lowest-ranked redundant guidance slot. So an implementation question
// shows the relevant source ROLES (binding requirement + standard + guidance) side by side
// instead of one role flooding the list. The promoted hit's original (now duplicate) position
// stays in the tail and is dropped by the caller's truncation to topK.
func ensureControlDiversity(results []LegalSearchResult, topK int) []LegalSearchResult {
if topK <= 0 || topK >= len(results) {
return results // everything is already returned — nothing to promote
}
roleAt := make([]string, len(results))
for i := range results {
roleAt[i] = classifyRole(results[i])
}
present := make(map[string]bool, topK)
for i := 0; i < topK; i++ {
present[roleAt[i]] = true
}
for _, want := range []string{roleOperationalReq, roleControlStandard} {
if present[want] {
continue
}
src := -1
for i := topK; i < len(results); i++ {
if roleAt[i] == want {
src = i
break
}
}
if src < 0 {
continue // role absent from the whole pool — nothing to promote
}
dst := -1
for j := topK - 1; j >= 0; j-- {
if roleAt[j] == roleImplGuidance {
dst = j
break
}
}
if dst < 0 {
continue // no redundant guidance to sacrifice — leave the head untouched
}
results[dst] = results[src]
roleAt[dst] = want
present[want] = true
}
return results
}