Files
breakpilot-compliance/backend-compliance
Benjamin Admin 2d2cb2a244 feat: Certification Capability Hypotheses — capability-centric library + empirical confidence
The bottleneck is knowledge, not the endpoint. This builds the knowledge the Onboarding Advisor needs,
restructured per the user's key insight: NOT "ISO27001 -> 30 capabilities" but each hypothesis as its
own object "capability -> supported_by: [certs]". A capability is written ONCE with all supporting
certs, so the shared management-system core (document control, incident, supplier, audit, access,
asset, monitoring, training, crypto, release, risk) covers most certifications with ~18 hypotheses
instead of ~300 — and multi-certification merges AUTOMATICALLY (a company's inferred caps = every
hypothesis whose supported_by intersects its certs).

Welt-1 throughout: "IF cert present, EXPECT capability (verification required)", never "erfüllt".
Capabilities NO cert suggests (SBOM, signed updates, CVD, support period) have no hypothesis -> they
stay in the delta and get asked. confidence is EMPIRICAL: computed from real-onboarding observations
(confirmed/(confirmed+refuted)), None until calibrated — never an LLM/expert score (record_observation
+ empirical_confidence). The long-term moat: knowledge that learns from reality, not from a norm.

compliance/onboarding/hypotheses.py (resolve_for_certifications / inferred_hypotheses / empirical_
confidence / record_observation) feeds the existing advisor_start unchanged; the demo now runs on the
curated library. Pure, mypy --strict clean, library is DATA (no norm text, no real names). Non-runtime
-> no deploy. 12 tests pass, check-loc 0.
2026-06-28 13:16:45 +02:00
..

backend-compliance

Python/FastAPI service implementing the DSGVO compliance API: DSR, DSFA, consent, controls, risks, evidence, audit, vendor management, ISMS, change requests, document generation.

Port: 8002 (container: bp-compliance-backend) Stack: Python 3.12, FastAPI, SQLAlchemy 2.x, Alembic, Keycloak auth.

Architecture

compliance/
├── api/            # Routers (thin, ≤30 LOC per handler)
├── services/       # Business logic
├── repositories/   # DB access
├── domain/         # Value objects, domain errors
├── schemas/        # Pydantic models, split per domain
└── db/models/      # SQLAlchemy ORM, one module per aggregate

The service follows this layered target structure but not all files are fully refactored yet. Phase 1 backlog is tracked in .claude/rules/loc-exceptions.txt (27 backend-compliance files currently excepted).

See ../AGENTS.python.md for the full convention and ../.claude/rules/architecture.md for the non-negotiable rules.

Run locally

cd backend-compliance
pip install -r requirements.txt
export COMPLIANCE_DATABASE_URL=...  # Postgres (Hetzner or local)
uvicorn main:app --reload --port 8002

Tests

pytest compliance/tests/ -v
pytest --cov=compliance --cov-report=term-missing

Layout: tests/unit/, tests/integration/, tests/contracts/. Contract tests diff /openapi.json against tests/contracts/openapi.baseline.json.

Public API surface

404+ endpoints across /api/v1/*. Grouped by domain: ai, audit, consent, dsfa, dsr, gdpr, vendor, evidence, change-requests, generation, projects, company-profile, isms. Every path is a contract — see the "Public endpoints" rule in the root CLAUDE.md.

Environment

Var Purpose
COMPLIANCE_DATABASE_URL Postgres DSN, sslmode=require
KEYCLOAK_* Auth verification
QDRANT_URL, QDRANT_API_KEY Vector search
CORE_VALKEY_URL Session cache

Don't touch

Database schema, __tablename__, column names, existing migrations under migrations/. See root CLAUDE.md rule 3.