Benjamin Admin
1e5aaf7103
CI / detect-changes (pull_request) Successful in 13s
CI / branch-name (pull_request) Successful in 2s
CI / guardrail-integrity (pull_request) Successful in 5s
CI / secret-scan (pull_request) Successful in 11s
CI / dep-audit (pull_request) Failing after 54s
CI / sbom-scan (pull_request) Failing after 1m1s
CI / build-sha-integrity (pull_request) Successful in 11s
CI / validate-canonical-controls (pull_request) Successful in 7s
CI / loc-budget (pull_request) Successful in 23s
CI / go-lint (pull_request) Successful in 53s
CI / python-lint (pull_request) Failing after 17s
CI / nodejs-lint (pull_request) Failing after 1m6s
CI / nodejs-build (pull_request) Successful in 2m59s
CI / test-go (pull_request) Successful in 1m0s
CI / iace-gt-coverage (pull_request) Successful in 17s
CI / test-python-backend (pull_request) Successful in 26s
CI / test-python-document-crawler (pull_request) Successful in 12s
CI / test-python-dsms-gateway (pull_request) Successful in 8s
Der Advisor fan-outete bisher selbst ueber eine feste Liste expliziter Collections
(advisor-rag.ts) und umging damit das #61-Scope-Routing (das nur den Default-Pfad
routet) → der gemessene +28-Retrieval-Gewinn (CB-100: 53→81, 0 Regr) kam nie beim
Antwort-LLM an. Dieser Router zieht den Fan-out in die Retriever-Schicht:
- SDK: LegalRAGClient.Retrieve() + POST /sdk/v1/rag/retrieve {query, top_k} —
fan-outet server-seitig ueber die Broad-Authority-Base + die KB-2026.1-Slice bei
inKBScope, merge+dedup, sortiert nach Authority-Score (rerankByAuthority je
Collection), top-K. Index-Warmup vor dem nebenlaeufigen Fan-out (Map-Race-frei).
Per-Env via RAG_ROUTER_COLLECTIONS.
- admin: advisor-rag.ts ruft EINMAL /retrieve statt 6-fach expliziter Collections.
Advisor ist collection-agnostisch (Vertrag Compiler→Collections→Retriever→Advisor);
COMPLIANCE_COLLECTIONS/searchCollection entfernt.
Validierung: Go-Unit (Router-Selektion, dedup); e2e gegen dev-Qdrant (echter
Retrieve(), CB-100-Stichprobe stride 5): OLD-hit 11/20 → NEW-hit 15/20, GAIN 4
(alle DS-Guidance), REGR 0 — reproduziert den +28/0-Regr durch den Produktionscode.
TS-Tests auf den Single-/retrieve-Call angepasst.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ai-compliance-sdk
Go/Gin service providing AI-Act compliance analysis: iACE impact assessments, UCCA rules engine, hazard library, training/academy, audit, escalation, portfolio, RBAC, RAG, whistleblower, workshop.
Port: 8090 → exposed 8093 (container: bp-compliance-ai-sdk)
Stack: Go 1.24, Gin, pgx, Postgres.
Architecture
Clean-arch refactor is complete:
cmd/server/main.go # Thin entrypoint, 7 LOC — wiring in internal/app/
internal/
├── app/
│ ├── app.go # Server initialization + lifecycle
│ └── routes.go # Route registration
├── api/handlers/ # 8 sub-resource handler files:
│ │ # iace_handler_projects, hazards, mitigations,
│ │ # techfile, monitoring, refdata, rag, components
├── iace/ # Store split into 7 files:
│ │ # store_projects, components, hazards,
│ │ # hazard_library, mitigations, evidence, audit
│ └── hazard_library/ # Split into 10 category files
└── ...
See ../AGENTS.go.md for the full convention.
Linting (Phase 5): .golangci.yml added — run golangci-lint run --timeout 5m ./....
Run locally
cd ai-compliance-sdk
go mod download
export COMPLIANCE_DATABASE_URL=...
go run ./cmd/server
Tests
go test -race -cover ./...
golangci-lint run --timeout 5m ./...
Co-located *_test.go, table-driven. Repo layer uses testcontainers-go (or the compose Postgres) — no SQL mocks.
Public API surface
Handlers under internal/api/handlers/ (8 sub-resource files). Health at GET /health. iACE, UCCA, training, academy, portfolio, escalation, audit, rag, whistleblower, workshop subresources. Every route is a contract.
Environment
| Var | Purpose |
|---|---|
COMPLIANCE_DATABASE_URL |
Postgres DSN |
LLM_GATEWAY_URL |
LLM router for rag/iACE |
QDRANT_URL |
Vector search |
Don't touch
DB schema. Hand-rolled migrations elsewhere own it.