feat(ai-sdk): controlled interpretation-intent guidance override (#34)
CI / detect-changes (push) Successful in 5s
CI / branch-name (push) Has been skipped
CI / guardrail-integrity (push) Has been skipped
CI / secret-scan (push) Has been skipped
CI / dep-audit (push) Has been skipped
CI / sbom-scan (push) Has been skipped
CI / build-sha-integrity (push) Successful in 5s
CI / validate-canonical-controls (push) Successful in 3s
CI / loc-budget (push) Successful in 17s
CI / go-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / python-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / nodejs-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / nodejs-build (push) Has been skipped
CI / test-go (push) Successful in 57s
CI / iace-gt-coverage (push) Successful in 15s
CI / test-python-backend (push) Has been skipped
CI / test-python-document-crawler (push) Has been skipped
CI / test-python-dsms-gateway (push) Has been skipped

This commit was merged in pull request #34.
This commit is contained in:
2026-06-24 09:01:25 +00:00
parent 230dc05287
commit f11b2e035f
2 changed files with 133 additions and 10 deletions
@@ -1,20 +1,61 @@
package ucca
import "sort"
import (
"sort"
"strings"
)
// Re-ranking coefficients (validated in the offline golden harness; Phase A — conservative).
const (
authorityCoef = 0.40 // * weight/100
jurisdictionGain = 0.05 // binding/guidance from DE or EU
foreignPenalty = 0.60 // foreign law on a DE/EU question (demoted, not removed)
unknownPenalty = 0.08
domainMatchGain = 0.15
offDomainPenalty = 0.10 // off-domain binding (demoted, not removed)
scopePenalty = 0.25 // BDSG Teil 3 (law enforcement) on a general DP question
topicGain = 0.18 // amplifier only
supersededPenalty = 0.50 // superseded Alt-Quelle (pre-eu-v1): demoted, nicht versteckt
authorityCoef = 0.40 // * weight/100
jurisdictionGain = 0.05 // binding/guidance from DE or EU
foreignPenalty = 0.60 // foreign law on a DE/EU question (demoted, not removed)
unknownPenalty = 0.08
domainMatchGain = 0.15
offDomainPenalty = 0.10 // off-domain binding (demoted, not removed)
scopePenalty = 0.25 // BDSG Teil 3 (law enforcement) on a general DP question
topicGain = 0.18 // amplifier only
supersededPenalty = 0.50 // superseded Alt-Quelle (pre-eu-v1): demoted, nicht versteckt
guidanceIntentGain = 0.25 // controlled guidance override on explicit interpretation intent
guidanceIntentMargin = 0.05 // ...only if the guideline is semantically competitive with binding
)
// guidanceIntentSignals mark a query that EXPLICITLY asks for an interpretation /
// recommendation by a guidance body, rather than for the binding obligation. Only
// then may a (semantically competitive) guideline outrank the binding norm.
var guidanceIntentSignals = []string{
"edpb", "europäischer datenschutzausschuss", "europaeischer datenschutzausschuss",
"dsk", "enisa", "bsi", "leitlinie", "guideline", "orientierungshilfe",
"auslegung", "empfiehlt", "empfehlung", "sagt", "laut",
}
// queryWantsGuidance reports whether the query explicitly asks for guidance/interpretation.
func queryWantsGuidance(query string) bool {
q := strings.ToLower(query)
for _, sig := range guidanceIntentSignals {
if strings.Contains(q, sig) {
return true
}
}
return false
}
// bestBindingSemantic returns the highest RAW semantic score among binding-law
// results (0 if none / intent not requested). Used as the guard threshold so an
// off-topic guideline cannot ride the interpretation-intent boost.
func bestBindingSemantic(results []LegalSearchResult, wantsGuidance bool) float64 {
if !wantsGuidance {
return 0
}
best := 0.0
for _, r := range results {
if r.SourceClass == "binding_law" && r.Score > best {
best = r.Score
}
}
return best
}
// authorityScore computes the normative relevance of a result for a query. It augments the
// semantic score with authority/jurisdiction/domain/scope/topic signals. Exposed for tests.
func authorityScore(query string, r LegalSearchResult, qDomain string, qForeign bool) float64 {
@@ -62,11 +103,21 @@ func rerankByAuthority(query string, results []LegalSearchResult) []LegalSearchR
}
qDomain := queryDomain(query)
qForeign := queryIsForeign(query)
wantsGuidance := queryWantsGuidance(query)
bestBindingSem := bestBindingSemantic(results, wantsGuidance)
out := make([]LegalSearchResult, len(results))
copy(out, results)
for i := range out {
out[i].Score = authorityScore(query, out[i], qDomain, qForeign)
// Interpretations-Intent (eng begrenzt): NUR wenn die Query explizit nach
// Guidance/Auslegung fragt UND die Leitlinie semantisch konkurrenzfaehig ist
// (>= bester binding-Treffer - margin), darf supervisory_guidance die bindende
// Norm ueberholen. Sonst bleibt binding > guidance (Normfrage unveraendert).
if wantsGuidance && out[i].SourceClass == "supervisory_guidance" &&
results[i].Score >= bestBindingSem-guidanceIntentMargin {
out[i].Score += guidanceIntentGain
}
}
sort.SliceStable(out, func(a, b int) bool {
return out[a].Score > out[b].Score