feat(audit): P34 Exec-Summary Score-Einordnung — 'wo Sie stehen sollten'
CI / detect-changes (push) Successful in 10s
CI / dep-audit (push) Has been skipped
CI / sbom-scan (push) Has been skipped
CI / validate-canonical-controls (push) Successful in 14s
CI / loc-budget (push) Failing after 16s
CI / go-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / branch-name (push) Has been skipped
CI / guardrail-integrity (push) Has been skipped
CI / secret-scan (push) Has been skipped
CI / nodejs-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / nodejs-build (push) Successful in 2m46s
CI / test-go (push) Has been skipped
CI / iace-gt-coverage (push) Has been skipped
CI / test-python-dsms-gateway (push) Has been skipped
CI / python-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / test-python-backend (push) Successful in 43s
CI / test-python-document-crawler (push) Has been skipped

_score_band_explanation: vier Baender (Sehr gut/Akzeptabel/Handlungs-
bedarf/Erhoehtes Risiko) liefern Label + erwartete Handlung. Wird als
neue Zeile unter den KPIs in der Exec-Summary gerendert (mit
score-farbiger Linkmark).

Sachlicher Ton — kein 'Vorstand muss sofort handeln', sondern
realistische Empfehlung (z.B. '70-84: Branchen-Median, einmaliges
Aufraeumen + Halbjahres-Check').

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Benjamin Admin
2026-05-21 16:51:34 +02:00
parent c491af5d02
commit 338e03d3b0
@@ -26,6 +26,47 @@ def _fmt_eur_range(low: int, high: int) -> str:
return f"{low:,}{high:,}".replace(",", ".")
def _build_score_band_block(pct: int, color: str) -> list[str]:
"""P34 — eine Zeile unter den KPIs: Score-Einordnung."""
band, hint = _score_band_explanation(pct)
return [
f'<div style="margin-top:10px;padding:10px 14px;'
f'background:rgba(255,255,255,0.04);border-left:3px solid {color};'
f'border-radius:4px">'
f'<div style="font-size:11px;color:#cbd5e1">'
f'<strong style="color:{color}">{band} ({pct}%)</strong> — {hint}'
f'</div></div>',
]
def _score_band_explanation(pct: int) -> tuple[str, str]:
"""P34 — Was bedeutet der Score: wo MUESSTE man stehen.
Returns (label, what_to_expect)."""
if pct >= 85:
return (
"Sehr gut", "Praxis-uebliche DSGVO-Risikolage. "
"Standard-Pflege reicht — jaehrliche Pruefung empfohlen.",
)
if pct >= 70:
return (
"Akzeptabel", "Branchen-Median. Verbleibende Findings sind "
"meist Formalia — Empfehlung: einmaliges Aufraeumen, dann "
"Halbjahres-Check.",
)
if pct >= 50:
return (
"Handlungsbedarf", "Mehrere wesentliche Themen offen. "
"Empfehlung: priorisierte Abarbeitung der HIGH-Findings "
"binnen 4-8 Wochen mit DSB + Web-Team.",
)
return (
"Erhoehtes Risiko", "Mehrere Kern-Pflichten fehlen oder sind "
"veraltet. Empfehlung: kurzfristiger Termin mit DSB / Rechtsabteilung "
"und Web-Team zur Priorisierung.",
)
def build_exec_summary_html(
scorecard: dict | None,
previous_scorecard: dict | None,
@@ -117,6 +158,9 @@ def build_exec_summary_html(
'</table>',
# P34 — Score-Einordnung "wer wo stehen muss"
*(_build_score_band_block(pct, score_color) if scorecard else []),
# CTAs
'<div style="margin-top:14px;padding-top:12px;border-top:1px solid '
'rgba(255,255,255,0.1);text-align:center">',