docs: Mandanten-Suppression API-Übergabe an Controls/CRA-Session
CI / python-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / nodejs-build (push) Has been skipped
CI / test-go (push) Has been skipped
CI / guardrail-integrity (push) Has been skipped
CI / iace-gt-coverage (push) Has been skipped
CI / secret-scan (push) Has been skipped
CI / test-python-backend (push) Has been skipped
CI / dep-audit (push) Has been skipped
CI / test-python-document-crawler (push) Has been skipped
CI / sbom-scan (push) Has been skipped
CI / test-python-dsms-gateway (push) Has been skipped
CI / build-sha-integrity (push) Successful in 13s
CI / detect-changes (push) Successful in 17s
CI / validate-canonical-controls (push) Successful in 10s
CI / branch-name (push) Has been skipped
CI / loc-budget (push) Successful in 28s
CI / go-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / nodejs-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / python-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / nodejs-build (push) Has been skipped
CI / test-go (push) Has been skipped
CI / guardrail-integrity (push) Has been skipped
CI / iace-gt-coverage (push) Has been skipped
CI / secret-scan (push) Has been skipped
CI / test-python-backend (push) Has been skipped
CI / dep-audit (push) Has been skipped
CI / test-python-document-crawler (push) Has been skipped
CI / sbom-scan (push) Has been skipped
CI / test-python-dsms-gateway (push) Has been skipped
CI / build-sha-integrity (push) Successful in 13s
CI / detect-changes (push) Successful in 17s
CI / validate-canonical-controls (push) Successful in 10s
CI / branch-name (push) Has been skipped
CI / loc-budget (push) Successful in 28s
CI / go-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / nodejs-lint (push) Has been skipped
Backend (Suppression-API + Filter) ist live; Frontend-Mark/Unmark (Cyber-Risiko- Projekt + Workspace) wird übergeben. Endpunkte, Integration, offenes Mapping (Anzeige-Entität → control_uuid) dokumentiert. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
|
||||
# Mandanten-Suppression — API-Übergabe (Backend fertig, UI offen)
|
||||
|
||||
**Status (2026-06-16):** Backend **LIVE auf prod + macmini**. Frontend-UI
|
||||
(Mark/Unmark) ist **offen** und an die Controls/CRA-Session übergeben.
|
||||
|
||||
## Was es tut
|
||||
Ein Mandant markiert ein Control als „nicht anwendbar / unbrauchbar" → es wird
|
||||
in seinen Use-Case-Ansichten (und künftig Repo-Scans) **ausgeblendet**.
|
||||
**Per-Tenant**, **reversibel** (nie gelöscht), **audit-geloggt** (wer/warum/wann).
|
||||
Geteilte Schicht für **alle** Surfaces — jede UI ruft dieselbe API mit ihrem
|
||||
`X-Tenant-ID`.
|
||||
|
||||
## API (backend-compliance)
|
||||
Alle Routen: Tenant über Header `X-Tenant-ID` (UUID).
|
||||
|
||||
- `GET /v1/controls/suppressions[?include_reverted=true]`
|
||||
→ Liste der Suppressions des Mandanten (Audit: control_uuid, reason, actor,
|
||||
active, created_at, reverted_at/by, control_id, title).
|
||||
- `POST /v1/controls/suppressions` Body: `{"control_uuid": "...", "reason": "...", "actor": "..."}`
|
||||
→ markiert als nicht anwendbar (idempotent; reaktiviert eine zurückgenommene).
|
||||
- `POST /v1/controls/suppressions/{control_uuid}/revert` Body: `{"reason": "...", "actor": "..."}`
|
||||
→ nimmt zurück (Zeile bleibt für Audit).
|
||||
|
||||
## Integration in die Controls-Ansicht
|
||||
`GET /v1/controls/use-cases/{use_case}/controls` (atom-grain) berücksichtigt die
|
||||
Suppression **nur wenn `X-Tenant-ID` mitgeschickt wird** (Agenten/CRA ohne Tenant
|
||||
unberührt):
|
||||
- Default: suppressed Controls **ausgeblendet**. `?include_suppressed=true` zeigt sie.
|
||||
- Response: `suppressed_count` (Anzahl ausgeblendet im aktuellen Scope) + pro
|
||||
Control ein `suppressed`-Flag (true wenn eingeblendet).
|
||||
|
||||
## Zu bauen (Übergabe)
|
||||
1. **Cyber-Risikobeurteilungs-Projekt** (admin-compliance): „nicht anwendbar"-Button
|
||||
pro Maßnahme/Control + „X ausgeblendet — anzeigen"-Toggle + Un-Mark.
|
||||
**KLÄREN:** Tragen die dort angezeigten „Maßnahmen" eine `control_uuid` (dann
|
||||
direkt `POST suppressions` mit dieser UUID)? Falls es CRA-M5xx / Findings sind,
|
||||
braucht es ein Mapping Anzeige-Entität → `control_uuid` (oder eine Erweiterung
|
||||
der Suppression auf diese Entität).
|
||||
2. **Workspace-Cockpit** (breakpilot-workspace, Anwälte): gleiche API, eigenes Frontend.
|
||||
|
||||
## Datenmodell
|
||||
Tabelle `compliance.control_suppressions` (Migration 156, FK-los — prod
|
||||
`canonical_controls` hatte nach dem DB-Swap keinen PK; mit Migration 157
|
||||
wiederhergestellt). PK `(tenant_id, control_uuid)`, `active` + `reverted_*` für
|
||||
Reversibilität, `actor`/`reason`/`created_at` für Audit. Geteilter Filter-Helper:
|
||||
`compliance.services.control_suppression.suppressed_control_uuids(db, tenant_id)`
|
||||
— auch für Repo-Scans nutzbar.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user