diff --git a/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/README.md b/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/README.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1a659e4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+# Applicability Engine Demo Package
+
+## Inhalt
+- `demo_cases.yaml` — 6 priorisierte Demo- und Regressionstestfälle
+- `expected_outputs/CASE-*.json` — Golden Outputs für die 6 Fälle
+- `evaluator.py` — vergleicht tatsächliche Engine-Outputs gegen die Assertions
+- `run_demo.py` — einfacher Runner
+- `reports/` — Zielordner für JSON- und Markdown-Reports
+
+## Schnellstart
+```bash
+python run_demo.py
+```
+
+Das nutzt `expected_outputs/` als Self-Test.
+
+## Gegen echte SDK-Outputs laufen lassen
+Lege pro Fall eine Datei `CASE-XYZ.json` mit folgendem Schema in ein Verzeichnis:
+
+```json
+{
+  "case_id": "CASE-001",
+  "assigned_controls": [],
+  "excluded_controls": [],
+  "escalations": [],
+  "inferred_industries": [],
+  "confidence": {
+    "overall": 0.0,
+    "industry_assignment": 0.0,
+    "control_assignment": 0.0
+  },
+  "explanation": "",
+  "uncertainty_flags": []
+}
+```
+
+Dann:
+
+```bash
+python run_demo.py --actual-dir /pfad/zu/deinen/outputs
+```
+
+## Testlogik
+Der Evaluator prüft:
+- `must_assign`
+- `must_not_assign`
+- `escalate_for_legal_review`
+- `inferred_industries.must_include`
+- `inferred_industries.must_not_include`
+- `reasoning_must_contain`
+
+Zusätzlich gibt es Warnings, wenn Grenzfälle eskaliert sind, aber keine `uncertainty_flags`
+gesetzt wurden oder die Confidence unplausibel hoch ist.
diff --git a/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/demo_cases.yaml b/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/demo_cases.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ba64c97
--- /dev/null
+++ b/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/demo_cases.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,239 @@
+version: "1.0"
+suite: "applicability-engine-demo-cases-priority-6"
+description: >
+  Priorisierte Demo- und Regressionstestfälle für die Applicability Engine.
+  Ziel: False Positives vermeiden, Scope-Overrides korrekt aktivieren und
+  Unsicherheiten sauber eskalieren.
+
+defaults:
+  jurisdiction: "DE"
+  evaluation_mode: "strict"
+  require_explanation: true
+  require_uncertainty_flag: true
+
+cases:
+
+  - id: "CASE-001"
+    title: "SaaS-Webshop mit Stripe Checkout"
+    objective: >
+      Prüfen, dass Stripe-Einbindung nicht fälschlich zu PSD2-/ZAG-/Zahlungsinstituts-
+      Controls führt, sondern zu Datenschutz-/Transparenz-/Drittanbieter-Controls.
+    profile:
+      company_type: "GmbH"
+      industry: "retail_ecommerce"
+      summary: >
+        Ein deutsches Unternehmen betreibt einen Webshop für physische Produkte.
+        Zahlungen werden über Stripe Checkout abgewickelt. Das Unternehmen hält
+        selbst keine Kundengelder, führt keine Zahlungskonten und bietet keine
+        eigenen Zahlungsdienste an.
+      facts:
+        sells_physical_products: true
+        webshop: true
+        payment_provider: "Stripe"
+        stores_card_data: false
+        holds_customer_funds: false
+        operates_payment_service: false
+        processes_personal_data: true
+        sends_data_to_stripe: true
+    expected:
+      inferred_industries:
+        must_include:
+          - "retail_ecommerce"
+        must_not_include:
+          - "financial_services"
+      controls:
+        must_assign:
+          - "GDPR-INFO-THIRDPARTY-001"
+          - "GDPR-ROPA-001"
+          - "GDPR-LEGAL-BASIS-001"
+          - "VENDOR-DUE-DILIGENCE-001"
+        must_not_assign:
+          - "PSD2-LICENSING-001"
+          - "PAYMENT-INSTITUTION-AUTH-001"
+          - "AML-KYC-CUSTOMER-ONBOARDING-001"
+        escalate_for_legal_review: []
+      reasoning_must_contain:
+        - "Stripe ist eigenständiger Zahlungsdienstleister"
+        - "keine eigene Erbringung regulierter Zahlungsdienste"
+        - "Datenschutz- und Transparenzpflichten bleiben relevant"
+
+  - id: "CASE-002"
+    title: "Bank gibt TAN-Generator mit Batterie an Kunden aus"
+    objective: >
+      Prüfen, dass branchenfremd wirkende Produktpflichten über Scope aktiviert
+      werden können, obwohl die Hauptbranche Finanzdienstleistung ist.
+    profile:
+      company_type: "AG"
+      industry: "financial_services"
+      summary: >
+        Eine Bank gibt physische TAN-Generatoren mit eingebauter Batterie an
+        Endkunden aus. Die Geräte werden unter eigener Marke vertrieben.
+      facts:
+        provides_banking_services: true
+        distributes_physical_products: true
+        product_contains_battery: true
+        product_under_own_brand: true
+        imports_product_from_non_eu: false
+        manufactures_product: false
+    expected:
+      inferred_industries:
+        must_include:
+          - "financial_services"
+        must_not_include:
+          - "manufacturing"
+      controls:
+        must_assign:
+          - "BANK-ACCESS-AUTH-001"
+          - "BATTERY-LABELING-001"
+          - "BATTERY-TAKEBACK-001"
+          - "PRODUCT-COMPLIANCE-DOC-001"
+        must_not_assign: []
+        may_assign_if_explained:
+          - "WEEE-REGISTRATION-001"
+        escalate_for_legal_review:
+          - "BATTERY-PRODUCER-DEFINITION-001"
+      reasoning_must_contain:
+        - "statische Branchenzuweisung ist nicht abschließend"
+        - "physisches Produkt mit Batterie erweitert den Scope"
+        - "Rolle als Inverkehrbringer oder Hersteller prüfen"
+
+  - id: "CASE-004"
+    title: "Fintech mit eigener Wallet und Weiterleitung von Kundengeldern"
+    objective: >
+      Positiver Gegentest: echte Finanzregulierung muss ausgelöst werden.
+    profile:
+      company_type: "GmbH"
+      industry: "financial_services"
+      summary: >
+        Ein Fintech bietet eine App mit Wallet-Funktion, Kundengelder werden
+        entgegengenommen und an Händler weitergeleitet.
+      facts:
+        provides_wallet: true
+        holds_customer_funds: true
+        executes_payment_transactions: true
+        customer_onboarding: true
+        transaction_monitoring: true
+    expected:
+      inferred_industries:
+        must_include:
+          - "financial_services"
+      controls:
+        must_assign:
+          - "PSD2-LICENSING-001"
+          - "AML-KYC-CUSTOMER-ONBOARDING-001"
+          - "AML-TRANSACTION-MONITORING-001"
+          - "FRAUD-CONTROLS-001"
+        must_not_assign: []
+        escalate_for_legal_review:
+          - "REGULATORY-PERIMETER-ASSESSMENT-001"
+      reasoning_must_contain:
+        - "möglicherweise regulierter Zahlungsdienst"
+        - "AML/KYC relevant"
+        - "rechtliche Einordnung nicht nur Datenschutz"
+
+  - id: "CASE-006"
+    title: "SaaS-Unternehmen verschickt nur SMS über externen Gateway"
+    objective: >
+      Prüfen, dass reine Nutzung eines Kommunikationsdienstes nicht automatisch
+      zu voller TKG-Relevanz führt.
+    profile:
+      company_type: "UG"
+      industry: "software_saas"
+      summary: >
+        Eine SaaS-Plattform verschickt Login-Codes per Twilio/SMS-Gateway,
+        betreibt aber kein eigenes öffentliches Telekommunikationsnetz und
+        bietet keinen Telekommunikationsdienst am Markt an.
+      facts:
+        sends_sms_notifications: true
+        uses_external_gateway: true
+        provides_public_telecom_services: false
+        operates_network: false
+    expected:
+      inferred_industries:
+        must_include:
+          - "software_saas"
+        must_not_include:
+          - "telecommunications"
+      controls:
+        must_assign:
+          - "VENDOR-DUE-DILIGENCE-001"
+          - "GDPR-INFO-THIRDPARTY-001"
+        must_not_assign:
+          - "TKG-CUSTOMER-INFORMATION-001"
+          - "TKG-CONTRACT-TRANSPARENCY-001"
+        escalate_for_legal_review:
+          - "ECS-QUALIFICATION-ASSESSMENT-001"
+      reasoning_must_contain:
+        - "bloße Nutzung eines Gateways ist nicht automatisch eigener TK-Dienst"
+
+  - id: "CASE-008"
+    title: "Importeur von IoT-Geräten mit Batterien und Funkmodul"
+    objective: >
+      Mehrfach-Scope: Batterie, Funk, Produktrecht, Importeurspflichten.
+    profile:
+      company_type: "GmbH"
+      industry: "software_saas"
+      summary: >
+        Ein Softwareunternehmen verkauft nun zusätzlich eigene IoT-Sensoren
+        mit Batterie und Funkmodul unter eigener Marke.
+      facts:
+        imports_from_non_eu: true
+        sells_hardware: true
+        product_contains_battery: true
+        product_has_radio: true
+        own_brand: true
+    expected:
+      inferred_industries:
+        must_include:
+          - "software_saas"
+      controls:
+        must_assign:
+          - "BATTERY-LABELING-001"
+          - "BATTERY-TAKEBACK-001"
+          - "CE-TECHNICAL-DOC-001"
+          - "IMPORTER-RESPONSIBILITIES-001"
+        must_not_assign: []
+        may_assign_if_explained:
+          - "RED-CONFORMITY-001"
+          - "WEEE-REGISTRATION-001"
+        escalate_for_legal_review:
+          - "PRODUCT-QUALIFICATION-MULTIREGIME-001"
+      reasoning_must_contain:
+        - "ursprüngliche Branche ist Software"
+        - "zusätzliche Produkt- und Importeurspflichten werden scope-basiert aktiviert"
+
+  - id: "CASE-011"
+    title: "Unklarer Grenzfall mit Embedded Finance"
+    objective: >
+      Das System muss Unsicherheit erkennen und sauber eskalieren.
+    profile:
+      company_type: "GmbH"
+      industry: "software_saas"
+      summary: >
+        Eine Plattform ermöglicht Händlern Auszahlungen, virtuelle Konten,
+        Split Settlements und einen Finanzierungsvorschuss, teilweise über
+        Partnerbanken, teilweise über eigene Prozesse.
+      facts:
+        virtual_accounts: true
+        split_settlements: true
+        advance_payments: true
+        partner_bank_involved: true
+        own_funds_flow_unclear: true
+    expected:
+      inferred_industries:
+        must_include:
+          - "software_saas"
+      controls:
+        must_assign:
+          - "THIRD-PARTY-FINANCIAL-PROVIDER-DUE-DILIGENCE-001"
+        must_not_assign: []
+        may_assign_if_explained:
+          - "PSD2-LICENSING-001"
+          - "AML-KYC-CUSTOMER-ONBOARDING-001"
+        escalate_for_legal_review:
+          - "REGULATORY-PERIMETER-ASSESSMENT-001"
+          - "OWN-VS-PARTNER-ROLE-ANALYSIS-001"
+      reasoning_must_contain:
+        - "unklarer regulatorischer Perimeter"
+        - "Rolle des Unternehmens nicht eindeutig"
+        - "Eskalation erforderlich"
diff --git a/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/evaluator.py b/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/evaluator.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..29d38aa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/evaluator.py
@@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import argparse
+import json
+from pathlib import Path
+from typing import Any, Dict, List, Tuple
+
+try:
+    import yaml
+except ImportError as exc:  # pragma: no cover
+    raise SystemExit("PyYAML is required. Install with: pip install pyyaml") from exc
+
+
+def load_yaml(path: Path) -> Dict[str, Any]:
+    with path.open("r", encoding="utf-8") as f:
+        return yaml.safe_load(f)
+
+
+def load_json(path: Path) -> Dict[str, Any]:
+    with path.open("r", encoding="utf-8") as f:
+        return json.load(f)
+
+
+def _contains_phrase(explanation: str, phrase: str) -> bool:
+    return phrase.lower() in explanation.lower()
+
+
+def evaluate_case(expected_case: Dict[str, Any], actual: Dict[str, Any]) -> Dict[str, Any]:
+    errors: List[str] = []
+    warnings: List[str] = []
+
+    expected = expected_case.get("expected", {})
+    expected_controls = expected.get("controls", {})
+    explanation = actual.get("explanation", "") or ""
+
+    assigned_controls = set(actual.get("assigned_controls", []))
+    escalations = set(actual.get("escalations", []))
+    inferred_industries = set(actual.get("inferred_industries", []))
+    uncertainty_flags = actual.get("uncertainty_flags", [])
+
+    for control in expected_controls.get("must_assign", []):
+        if control not in assigned_controls:
+            errors.append(f"missing must_assign control: {control}")
+
+    for control in expected_controls.get("must_not_assign", []):
+        if control in assigned_controls:
+            errors.append(f"forbidden control assigned: {control}")
+
+    for control in expected_controls.get("escalate_for_legal_review", []):
+        if control not in escalations:
+            errors.append(f"missing escalation: {control}")
+
+    for control in expected_controls.get("may_assign_if_explained", []):
+        if control in assigned_controls and not explanation:
+            errors.append(
+                f"control assigned without explanation for may_assign_if_explained: {control}"
+            )
+
+    expected_industries = expected.get("inferred_industries", {})
+    for industry in expected_industries.get("must_include", []):
+        if industry not in inferred_industries:
+            errors.append(f"missing inferred industry: {industry}")
+
+    for industry in expected_industries.get("must_not_include", []):
+        if industry in inferred_industries:
+            errors.append(f"forbidden inferred industry present: {industry}")
+
+    for phrase in expected.get("reasoning_must_contain", []):
+        if not _contains_phrase(explanation, phrase):
+            errors.append(f"missing reasoning phrase: {phrase}")
+
+    require_uncertainty = bool(expected_controls.get("escalate_for_legal_review", []))
+    if require_uncertainty and not uncertainty_flags:
+        warnings.append("case includes escalations but actual output has no uncertainty_flags")
+
+    overall_conf = ((actual.get("confidence") or {}).get("overall"))
+    if expected_controls.get("escalate_for_legal_review") and isinstance(overall_conf, (int, float)):
+        if overall_conf >= 0.9:
+            warnings.append(
+                f"high confidence ({overall_conf}) on escalated boundary case; review whether too certain"
+            )
+
+    return {
+        "case_id": expected_case["id"],
+        "title": expected_case.get("title"),
+        "passed": len(errors) == 0,
+        "errors": errors,
+        "warnings": warnings,
+    }
+
+
+def evaluate_suite(demo_cases_path: Path, actual_outputs_dir: Path) -> Dict[str, Any]:
+    suite = load_yaml(demo_cases_path)
+    results: List[Dict[str, Any]] = []
+
+    for case in suite.get("cases", []):
+        case_id = case["id"]
+        actual_path = actual_outputs_dir / f"{case_id}.json"
+        if not actual_path.exists():
+            results.append({
+                "case_id": case_id,
+                "title": case.get("title"),
+                "passed": False,
+                "errors": [f"missing actual output file: {actual_path.name}"],
+                "warnings": [],
+            })
+            continue
+        actual = load_json(actual_path)
+        results.append(evaluate_case(case, actual))
+
+    passed = sum(1 for r in results if r["passed"])
+    failed = len(results) - passed
+
+    return {
+        "suite": suite.get("suite"),
+        "total_cases": len(results),
+        "passed": passed,
+        "failed": failed,
+        "results": results,
+    }
+
+
+def render_markdown_report(report: Dict[str, Any]) -> str:
+    lines: List[str] = []
+    lines.append(f"# {report.get('suite', 'Applicability Engine Demo Report')}")
+    lines.append("")
+    lines.append("## Summary")
+    lines.append(f"- Total cases: {report['total_cases']}")
+    lines.append(f"- Passed: {report['passed']}")
+    lines.append(f"- Failed: {report['failed']}")
+    lines.append("")
+
+    failed_cases = [r for r in report["results"] if not r["passed"]]
+    if failed_cases:
+        lines.append("## Failed cases")
+        for case in failed_cases:
+            lines.append(f"### {case['case_id']} — {case.get('title', '')}")
+            for err in case["errors"]:
+                lines.append(f"- {err}")
+            if case["warnings"]:
+                lines.append("- Warnings:")
+                for w in case["warnings"]:
+                    lines.append(f"  - {w}")
+            lines.append("")
+    else:
+        lines.append("## Failed cases")
+        lines.append("None.")
+        lines.append("")
+
+    lines.append("## All results")
+    for case in report["results"]:
+        status = "PASS" if case["passed"] else "FAIL"
+        lines.append(f"- {case['case_id']}: {status}")
+        for w in case["warnings"]:
+            lines.append(f"  - warning: {w}")
+    lines.append("")
+    return "\n".join(lines)
+
+
+def main() -> None:
+    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Evaluate Applicability Engine demo cases.")
+    parser.add_argument("--cases", type=Path, required=True, help="Path to demo_cases.yaml")
+    parser.add_argument("--actual-dir", type=Path, required=True, help="Directory containing actual CASE-XXX.json outputs")
+    parser.add_argument("--report-json", type=Path, required=False, help="Write machine-readable report JSON")
+    parser.add_argument("--report-md", type=Path, required=False, help="Write markdown report")
+    args = parser.parse_args()
+
+    report = evaluate_suite(args.cases, args.actual_dir)
+
+    if args.report_json:
+        args.report_json.write_text(json.dumps(report, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False), encoding="utf-8")
+
+    if args.report_md:
+        args.report_md.write_text(render_markdown_report(report), encoding="utf-8")
+
+    print(json.dumps(report, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False))
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    main()
diff --git a/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/expected_outputs/CASE-001.json b/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/expected_outputs/CASE-001.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0d5975c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/expected_outputs/CASE-001.json
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+{
+  "case_id": "CASE-001",
+  "assigned_controls": [
+    "GDPR-INFO-THIRDPARTY-001",
+    "GDPR-ROPA-001",
+    "GDPR-LEGAL-BASIS-001",
+    "VENDOR-DUE-DILIGENCE-001"
+  ],
+  "excluded_controls": [
+    "PSD2-LICENSING-001",
+    "PAYMENT-INSTITUTION-AUTH-001",
+    "AML-KYC-CUSTOMER-ONBOARDING-001"
+  ],
+  "escalations": [],
+  "inferred_industries": [
+    "retail_ecommerce"
+  ],
+  "confidence": {
+    "overall": 0.93,
+    "industry_assignment": 0.96,
+    "control_assignment": 0.91
+  },
+  "explanation": "Stripe ist eigenständiger Zahlungsdienstleister. Das Unternehmen erbringt keine eigene Erbringung regulierter Zahlungsdienste. Datenschutz- und Transparenzpflichten bleiben relevant, insbesondere Informationspflichten, ROPA, Rechtsgrundlage und Vendor Due Diligence.",
+  "uncertainty_flags": []
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/expected_outputs/CASE-002.json b/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/expected_outputs/CASE-002.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c090c53
--- /dev/null
+++ b/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/expected_outputs/CASE-002.json
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+{
+  "case_id": "CASE-002",
+  "assigned_controls": [
+    "BANK-ACCESS-AUTH-001",
+    "BATTERY-LABELING-001",
+    "BATTERY-TAKEBACK-001",
+    "PRODUCT-COMPLIANCE-DOC-001",
+    "WEEE-REGISTRATION-001"
+  ],
+  "excluded_controls": [],
+  "escalations": [
+    "BATTERY-PRODUCER-DEFINITION-001"
+  ],
+  "inferred_industries": [
+    "financial_services"
+  ],
+  "confidence": {
+    "overall": 0.82,
+    "industry_assignment": 0.95,
+    "control_assignment": 0.76
+  },
+  "explanation": "Die statische Branchenzuweisung ist nicht abschließend. Ein physisches Produkt mit Batterie erweitert den Scope über die originäre Finanzbranche hinaus. Zusätzlich zu banktypischen Controls sind Batterie- und Produktpflichten relevant. Die Rolle als Inverkehrbringer oder Hersteller prüfen bleibt für die genaue Abgrenzung eskalationsbedürftig.",
+  "uncertainty_flags": [
+    "producer_role_unclear"
+  ]
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/expected_outputs/CASE-004.json b/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/expected_outputs/CASE-004.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c78de94
--- /dev/null
+++ b/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/expected_outputs/CASE-004.json
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+{
+  "case_id": "CASE-004",
+  "assigned_controls": [
+    "PSD2-LICENSING-001",
+    "AML-KYC-CUSTOMER-ONBOARDING-001",
+    "AML-TRANSACTION-MONITORING-001",
+    "FRAUD-CONTROLS-001"
+  ],
+  "excluded_controls": [],
+  "escalations": [
+    "REGULATORY-PERIMETER-ASSESSMENT-001"
+  ],
+  "inferred_industries": [
+    "financial_services"
+  ],
+  "confidence": {
+    "overall": 0.89,
+    "industry_assignment": 0.97,
+    "control_assignment": 0.87
+  },
+  "explanation": "Möglicherweise regulierter Zahlungsdienst. AML/KYC relevant aufgrund der Entgegennahme und Weiterleitung von Kundengeldern sowie des Onboardings. Die rechtliche Einordnung nicht nur Datenschutz, sondern aufsichtsrechtlicher Perimeter, muss zusätzlich rechtlich validiert werden.",
+  "uncertainty_flags": [
+    "regulatory_perimeter_needs_confirmation"
+  ]
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/expected_outputs/CASE-006.json b/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/expected_outputs/CASE-006.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0534264
--- /dev/null
+++ b/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/expected_outputs/CASE-006.json
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+{
+  "case_id": "CASE-006",
+  "assigned_controls": [
+    "VENDOR-DUE-DILIGENCE-001",
+    "GDPR-INFO-THIRDPARTY-001"
+  ],
+  "excluded_controls": [
+    "TKG-CUSTOMER-INFORMATION-001",
+    "TKG-CONTRACT-TRANSPARENCY-001"
+  ],
+  "escalations": [
+    "ECS-QUALIFICATION-ASSESSMENT-001"
+  ],
+  "inferred_industries": [
+    "software_saas"
+  ],
+  "confidence": {
+    "overall": 0.87,
+    "industry_assignment": 0.94,
+    "control_assignment": 0.84
+  },
+  "explanation": "Die bloße Nutzung eines Gateways ist nicht automatisch eigener TK-Dienst. Relevanz besteht primär für Drittanbieter-Management und Datenschutzinformation. Zur Absicherung bleibt eine ECS-Qualifikationsprüfung als Eskalation sinnvoll.",
+  "uncertainty_flags": [
+    "ecs_boundary_case"
+  ]
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/expected_outputs/CASE-008.json b/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/expected_outputs/CASE-008.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3c31338
--- /dev/null
+++ b/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/expected_outputs/CASE-008.json
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+{
+  "case_id": "CASE-008",
+  "assigned_controls": [
+    "BATTERY-LABELING-001",
+    "BATTERY-TAKEBACK-001",
+    "CE-TECHNICAL-DOC-001",
+    "IMPORTER-RESPONSIBILITIES-001",
+    "RED-CONFORMITY-001",
+    "WEEE-REGISTRATION-001"
+  ],
+  "excluded_controls": [],
+  "escalations": [
+    "PRODUCT-QUALIFICATION-MULTIREGIME-001"
+  ],
+  "inferred_industries": [
+    "software_saas"
+  ],
+  "confidence": {
+    "overall": 0.84,
+    "industry_assignment": 0.93,
+    "control_assignment": 0.8
+  },
+  "explanation": "Die ursprüngliche Branche ist Software. Durch Hardwarevertrieb unter eigener Marke werden zusätzliche Produkt- und Importeurspflichten werden scope-basiert aktiviert. Batterie-, Funk-, CE- und Importeursthemen greifen kumulativ; die exakte Multi-Regime-Produktqualifikation wird eskaliert.",
+  "uncertainty_flags": [
+    "multi_regime_product_scope"
+  ]
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/expected_outputs/CASE-011.json b/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/expected_outputs/CASE-011.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9501a89
--- /dev/null
+++ b/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/expected_outputs/CASE-011.json
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+{
+  "case_id": "CASE-011",
+  "assigned_controls": [
+    "THIRD-PARTY-FINANCIAL-PROVIDER-DUE-DILIGENCE-001"
+  ],
+  "excluded_controls": [],
+  "escalations": [
+    "REGULATORY-PERIMETER-ASSESSMENT-001",
+    "OWN-VS-PARTNER-ROLE-ANALYSIS-001"
+  ],
+  "inferred_industries": [
+    "software_saas"
+  ],
+  "confidence": {
+    "overall": 0.61,
+    "industry_assignment": 0.9,
+    "control_assignment": 0.58
+  },
+  "explanation": "Unklarer regulatorischer Perimeter. Rolle des Unternehmens nicht eindeutig — Partnerbanken beteiligt, zugleich eigene Prozesse für Auszahlungen, Split Settlements und Vorschüsse denkbar. Eskalation erforderlich, bevor belastbar über PSD2- oder AML-Pflichten entschieden wird.",
+  "uncertainty_flags": [
+    "unclear_funds_flow",
+    "own_vs_partner_role_unclear"
+  ]
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/reports/latest_report.json b/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/reports/latest_report.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..55b11bb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/reports/latest_report.json
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+{
+  "suite": "applicability-engine-demo-cases-priority-6",
+  "total_cases": 6,
+  "passed": 6,
+  "failed": 0,
+  "results": [
+    {
+      "case_id": "CASE-001",
+      "title": "SaaS-Webshop mit Stripe Checkout",
+      "passed": true,
+      "errors": [],
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    {
+      "case_id": "CASE-002",
+      "title": "Bank gibt TAN-Generator mit Batterie an Kunden aus",
+      "passed": true,
+      "errors": [],
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    {
+      "case_id": "CASE-004",
+      "title": "Fintech mit eigener Wallet und Weiterleitung von Kundengeldern",
+      "passed": true,
+      "errors": [],
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    {
+      "case_id": "CASE-006",
+      "title": "SaaS-Unternehmen verschickt nur SMS über externen Gateway",
+      "passed": true,
+      "errors": [],
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    {
+      "case_id": "CASE-008",
+      "title": "Importeur von IoT-Geräten mit Batterien und Funkmodul",
+      "passed": true,
+      "errors": [],
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    {
+      "case_id": "CASE-011",
+      "title": "Unklarer Grenzfall mit Embedded Finance",
+      "passed": true,
+      "errors": [],
+      "warnings": []
+    }
+  ]
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/reports/latest_report.md b/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/reports/latest_report.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..eee688e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/reports/latest_report.md
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+# applicability-engine-demo-cases-priority-6
+
+## Summary
+- Total cases: 6
+- Passed: 6
+- Failed: 0
+
+## Failed cases
+None.
+
+## All results
+- CASE-001: PASS
+- CASE-002: PASS
+- CASE-004: PASS
+- CASE-006: PASS
+- CASE-008: PASS
+- CASE-011: PASS
diff --git a/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/run_demo.py b/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/run_demo.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d7f270f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/control-pipeline/tests/applicability_demo/run_demo.py
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import argparse
+import shutil
+import subprocess
+import sys
+from pathlib import Path
+
+
+def main() -> None:
+    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Run Applicability Engine demo evaluation.")
+    parser.add_argument("--root", type=Path, default=Path(__file__).resolve().parent)
+    parser.add_argument(
+        "--actual-dir",
+        type=Path,
+        default=None,
+        help="Directory with actual outputs. Defaults to expected_outputs for self-test.",
+    )
+    args = parser.parse_args()
+
+    root = args.root
+    actual_dir = args.actual_dir or (root / "expected_outputs")
+    reports_dir = root / "reports"
+    reports_dir.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
+
+    cmd = [
+        sys.executable,
+        str(root / "evaluator.py"),
+        "--cases",
+        str(root / "demo_cases.yaml"),
+        "--actual-dir",
+        str(actual_dir),
+        "--report-json",
+        str(reports_dir / "latest_report.json"),
+        "--report-md",
+        str(reports_dir / "latest_report.md"),
+    ]
+    completed = subprocess.run(cmd, check=False)
+    raise SystemExit(completed.returncode)
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    main()