Files
breakpilot-compliance/ai-compliance-sdk/internal/iace/datasources/nasa_rcm_decision_logic.md
T
Benjamin Admin de140e564e feat(iace): FMEA P1 — open methodology anchors + bp_iace_fmea_kb
P1 of the auto-FMEA build plan: establish the public-domain methodology
foundation (no AIAG-VDA/SAE/IEC tables reproduced).
- fmea_data_sources.go: MIL-STD-882E severity (Cat I-IV→1-10) + probability
  (A-F→1-10 with per-hour λ bands), OccurrenceFromRate(λp·α), SeverityForCategory,
  MIL-STD-1629A CriticalityCm = λp·α·β·t. Own 1-10 projection, government-anchored.
- 4 versioned source docs (MIL-STD-1629A, MIL-STD-882E, NASA RCM, FMD-91/NPRD-91)
  ingested into the new RAG collection bp_iace_fmea_kb (whitelisted).
- Tests for all scales/mappings/criticality (green).

Next (P1 step 2): fetch FMD-91/NPRD-91 bulk λ/α tables from DTIC.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-12 22:59:01 +02:00

2.0 KiB

Failure-consequence & maintenance decision logic — NASA RCM (public domain)

Drives the IACE auto-FMEA "recommended action" layer and the safety-priority rule. Ingested into bp_iace_fmea_kb.

Source

  • Source: NASA — NPR 8831.2F Ch.7 (Reliability-Centered Maintenance) and NASA GSFC-HDBK-8004 (FMEA & Risk Assessment)
  • License: US Government work — public domain ("cleared for public accessibility")
  • Attribution: Source: NASA NPR 8831.2F / GSFC-HDBK-8004, public domain
  • Retrieved: 2026-06 · Ref: nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov / standards.nasa.gov

Safety-consequence priority (key rule)

A failure with a safety consequence is prioritised regardless of how rare it is — "safety shall be ensured at any cost; thereafter cost-effectiveness becomes the criterion." So in a SAFETY FMEA a single Catastrophic mode matters even at low occurrence — severity dominates the ranking.

Failure definition (broad)

"Any unsatisfactory condition" — loss of FUNCTION or loss of QUALITY/ acceptable performance — not only complete breakdown. (Captures drift, degradation, intermittent.)

Failure character Recommended task
Gives advance warning / measurable degradation Condition-based / predictive monitoring
Age/wear-related, predictable Preventive / scheduled replacement
Random, low consequence Run-to-failure (corrective)
Hidden / no effective task Redesign or add redundancy / detection

This maps onto the IACE 3-step measure hierarchy (inherently safe design → safeguarding → information) for the FMEA's control/action column.

How used in IACE

  • Safety-priority rule overrides pure Cm ranking when the linked ISO 12100 hazard is high-severity (the safety-FMEA bridge).
  • The decision table seeds the recommended-action suggestions per failure mode.

Concepts only — IEC 61508/ISO 13849 (SIL/PL, DC, β-factor tables) are copyrighted and NOT reproduced; diagnostic-coverage / common-cause are used as generic ideas.