e1df24cad7
CI / detect-changes (push) Successful in 10s
CI / branch-name (push) Has been skipped
CI / guardrail-integrity (push) Has been skipped
CI / secret-scan (push) Has been skipped
CI / dep-audit (push) Has been skipped
CI / test-python-backend (push) Successful in 38s
CI / test-python-document-crawler (push) Has been skipped
CI / test-python-dsms-gateway (push) Has been skipped
CI / sbom-scan (push) Has been skipped
CI / validate-canonical-controls (push) Successful in 16s
CI / loc-budget (push) Failing after 16s
CI / go-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / python-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / nodejs-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / nodejs-build (push) Has been skipped
CI / test-go (push) Has been skipped
CI / iace-gt-coverage (push) Has been skipped
P93: 'Cookies verbieten', 'Tracking ablehnen', 'verweigern' usw. zaehlen nun als expliziter Reject-Mechanismus. EDPB 5/2020 schreibt kein bestimmtes Wort vor — BMW False-Positive 'Kein Ablehnen-Mechanismus' weg. P95: cookie_table-Check akzeptiert nun zwei gleichwertige Formate: (a) klassische Tabelle, (b) Vendor-Detailseite mit Block pro Anbieter (Name+Anschrift, Zweck, Speicherdauer aggregiert, Cookie-Namen-Liste, Opt-Out-Link). BMW-Stil mit Adform-Block ist DSK-OH 2024 konform. False-Positive 'tabellarisches Cookie-Verzeichnis fehlt' wird seltener. Hinweis-Text in cookie_table umformuliert: nennt beide akzeptablen Formate, weniger normativ. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>