6d2de9b897
All checks were successful
CI/CD / go-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI/CD / python-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI/CD / nodejs-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI/CD / test-go-ai-compliance (push) Successful in 36s
CI/CD / test-python-backend-compliance (push) Successful in 33s
CI/CD / test-python-document-crawler (push) Successful in 24s
CI/CD / test-python-dsms-gateway (push) Successful in 21s
CI/CD / validate-canonical-controls (push) Successful in 13s
CI/CD / Deploy (push) Successful in 2s
Phase 1: Fix completeness gates G23 (require verified/rejected mitigations) and G09 (audit trail check) Phase 2: LLM-based tech-file section generation with 19 German prompts and RAG enrichment Phase 3: Multi-format document export (PDF/Excel/DOCX/Markdown/JSON) Phase 4: Company profile → IACE data flow with auto component/classification creation Phase 5: TipTap WYSIWYG editor replacing textarea for tech-file sections Phase 6: User journey tests, developer portal API reference, updated documentation Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
730 lines
19 KiB
Go
730 lines
19 KiB
Go
package iace
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"encoding/json"
|
|
"math"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/google/uuid"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// helper to build metadata with the given keys set to non-empty string values.
|
|
func metadataWith(keys ...string) json.RawMessage {
|
|
m := make(map[string]interface{})
|
|
for _, k := range keys {
|
|
m[k] = "defined"
|
|
}
|
|
data, _ := json.Marshal(m)
|
|
return data
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestCompletenessCheck_EmptyContext(t *testing.T) {
|
|
checker := NewCompletenessChecker()
|
|
|
|
ctx := &CompletenessContext{
|
|
Project: nil,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
result := checker.Check(ctx)
|
|
|
|
if result.CanExport {
|
|
t.Error("CanExport should be false for empty context")
|
|
}
|
|
// With nil project, most gates fail. However, some auto-pass:
|
|
// G06 (AI classification): auto-passes when HasAI=false
|
|
// G22 (critical/high mitigated): auto-passes when no critical/high assessments exist
|
|
// G23 (mitigations verified): auto-passes when no mitigations (empty list)
|
|
// G42 (AI documents): auto-passes when HasAI=false
|
|
// That gives 4 required gates passing even with empty context.
|
|
if result.PassedRequired != 4 {
|
|
t.Errorf("PassedRequired = %d, want 4 (G06, G22, G23, G42 auto-pass)", result.PassedRequired)
|
|
}
|
|
// Score should be low: 4/20 * 80 = 16
|
|
if result.Score > 20 {
|
|
t.Errorf("Score = %f, expected <= 20 for empty context", result.Score)
|
|
}
|
|
if len(result.Gates) == 0 {
|
|
t.Error("Gates should not be empty")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestCompletenessCheck_MinimalValidProject(t *testing.T) {
|
|
checker := NewCompletenessChecker()
|
|
|
|
projectID := uuid.New()
|
|
hazardID := uuid.New()
|
|
componentID := uuid.New()
|
|
|
|
ctx := &CompletenessContext{
|
|
Project: &Project{
|
|
ID: projectID,
|
|
MachineName: "TestMachine",
|
|
Description: "A test machine for unit testing",
|
|
Manufacturer: "TestCorp",
|
|
CEMarkingTarget: "2023/1230",
|
|
Metadata: metadataWith("operating_limits", "foreseeable_misuse"),
|
|
},
|
|
Components: []Component{
|
|
{ID: componentID, Name: "SafetyPLC", ComponentType: ComponentTypeSoftware, IsSafetyRelevant: true},
|
|
},
|
|
Classifications: []RegulatoryClassification{
|
|
{Regulation: RegulationAIAct},
|
|
{Regulation: RegulationMachineryRegulation},
|
|
{Regulation: RegulationNIS2},
|
|
{Regulation: RegulationCRA},
|
|
},
|
|
Hazards: []Hazard{
|
|
{ID: hazardID, ProjectID: projectID, ComponentID: componentID, Name: "TestHazard", Category: "test"},
|
|
},
|
|
Assessments: []RiskAssessment{
|
|
{ID: uuid.New(), HazardID: hazardID, RiskLevel: RiskLevelLow, IsAcceptable: true},
|
|
},
|
|
Mitigations: []Mitigation{
|
|
{ID: uuid.New(), HazardID: hazardID, Status: MitigationStatusVerified},
|
|
},
|
|
Evidence: []Evidence{
|
|
{ID: uuid.New(), ProjectID: projectID, FileName: "test.pdf"},
|
|
},
|
|
TechFileSections: []TechFileSection{
|
|
{ID: uuid.New(), ProjectID: projectID, SectionType: "risk_assessment_report"},
|
|
{ID: uuid.New(), ProjectID: projectID, SectionType: "hazard_log_combined"},
|
|
},
|
|
HasAI: false,
|
|
PatternMatchingPerformed: true,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
result := checker.Check(ctx)
|
|
|
|
if !result.CanExport {
|
|
t.Error("CanExport should be true for fully valid project")
|
|
for _, g := range result.Gates {
|
|
if g.Required && !g.Passed {
|
|
t.Errorf(" Required gate %s (%s) not passed: %s", g.ID, g.Label, g.Details)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if result.PassedRequired != result.TotalRequired {
|
|
t.Errorf("PassedRequired = %d, TotalRequired = %d, want all passed", result.PassedRequired, result.TotalRequired)
|
|
}
|
|
// Score should be at least 80 (all required) + 15 (evidence recommended) = 95
|
|
if result.Score < 80 {
|
|
t.Errorf("Score = %f, expected >= 80 for fully valid project", result.Score)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestCompletenessCheck_PartialRequiredGates(t *testing.T) {
|
|
checker := NewCompletenessChecker()
|
|
|
|
// Provide only some required data: machine name, manufacturer, description, one component, one safety-relevant.
|
|
// Missing: operating_limits, foreseeable_misuse, classifications, hazards, assessments, tech files.
|
|
ctx := &CompletenessContext{
|
|
Project: &Project{
|
|
MachineName: "PartialMachine",
|
|
Description: "Some description",
|
|
Manufacturer: "TestCorp",
|
|
},
|
|
Components: []Component{
|
|
{Name: "Sensor", ComponentType: ComponentTypeSensor, IsSafetyRelevant: true},
|
|
},
|
|
HasAI: false,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
result := checker.Check(ctx)
|
|
|
|
if result.CanExport {
|
|
t.Error("CanExport should be false when not all required gates pass")
|
|
}
|
|
if result.PassedRequired == 0 {
|
|
t.Error("Some required gates should pass (G01, G02, G05, G06, G07, G08)")
|
|
}
|
|
if result.PassedRequired >= result.TotalRequired {
|
|
t.Errorf("PassedRequired (%d) should be less than TotalRequired (%d)", result.PassedRequired, result.TotalRequired)
|
|
}
|
|
// Score should be partial
|
|
if result.Score <= 0 || result.Score >= 95 {
|
|
t.Errorf("Score = %f, expected partial score between 0 and 95", result.Score)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestCompletenessCheck_G06_AIClassificationGate(t *testing.T) {
|
|
checker := NewCompletenessChecker()
|
|
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
hasAI bool
|
|
classifications []RegulatoryClassification
|
|
wantG06Passed bool
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
name: "no AI present auto-passes G06",
|
|
hasAI: false,
|
|
classifications: nil,
|
|
wantG06Passed: true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "AI present without classification fails G06",
|
|
hasAI: true,
|
|
classifications: nil,
|
|
wantG06Passed: false,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "AI present with AI Act classification passes G06",
|
|
hasAI: true,
|
|
classifications: []RegulatoryClassification{
|
|
{Regulation: RegulationAIAct},
|
|
},
|
|
wantG06Passed: true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "AI present with non-AI classification fails G06",
|
|
hasAI: true,
|
|
classifications: []RegulatoryClassification{
|
|
{Regulation: RegulationCRA},
|
|
},
|
|
wantG06Passed: false,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, tt := range tests {
|
|
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
ctx := &CompletenessContext{
|
|
Project: &Project{MachineName: "Test"},
|
|
Classifications: tt.classifications,
|
|
HasAI: tt.hasAI,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
result := checker.Check(ctx)
|
|
|
|
for _, g := range result.Gates {
|
|
if g.ID == "G06" {
|
|
if g.Passed != tt.wantG06Passed {
|
|
t.Errorf("G06 Passed = %v, want %v", g.Passed, tt.wantG06Passed)
|
|
}
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
t.Error("G06 gate not found in results")
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestCompletenessCheck_G42_AIDocumentsGate(t *testing.T) {
|
|
checker := NewCompletenessChecker()
|
|
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
hasAI bool
|
|
techFileSections []TechFileSection
|
|
wantG42Passed bool
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
name: "no AI auto-passes G42",
|
|
hasAI: false,
|
|
techFileSections: nil,
|
|
wantG42Passed: true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "AI present without tech files fails G42",
|
|
hasAI: true,
|
|
techFileSections: nil,
|
|
wantG42Passed: false,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "AI present with only intended_purpose fails G42",
|
|
hasAI: true,
|
|
techFileSections: []TechFileSection{
|
|
{SectionType: "ai_intended_purpose"},
|
|
},
|
|
wantG42Passed: false,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "AI present with only model_description fails G42",
|
|
hasAI: true,
|
|
techFileSections: []TechFileSection{
|
|
{SectionType: "ai_model_description"},
|
|
},
|
|
wantG42Passed: false,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "AI present with both AI sections passes G42",
|
|
hasAI: true,
|
|
techFileSections: []TechFileSection{
|
|
{SectionType: "ai_intended_purpose"},
|
|
{SectionType: "ai_model_description"},
|
|
},
|
|
wantG42Passed: true,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, tt := range tests {
|
|
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
ctx := &CompletenessContext{
|
|
Project: &Project{MachineName: "Test"},
|
|
TechFileSections: tt.techFileSections,
|
|
HasAI: tt.hasAI,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
result := checker.Check(ctx)
|
|
|
|
for _, g := range result.Gates {
|
|
if g.ID == "G42" {
|
|
if g.Passed != tt.wantG42Passed {
|
|
t.Errorf("G42 Passed = %v, want %v", g.Passed, tt.wantG42Passed)
|
|
}
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
t.Error("G42 gate not found in results")
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestCompletenessCheck_G22_CriticalHighMitigated(t *testing.T) {
|
|
checker := NewCompletenessChecker()
|
|
|
|
hazardID := uuid.New()
|
|
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
assessments []RiskAssessment
|
|
mitigations []Mitigation
|
|
wantG22Passed bool
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
name: "no critical/high hazards auto-passes G22",
|
|
assessments: []RiskAssessment{{HazardID: hazardID, RiskLevel: RiskLevelLow}},
|
|
mitigations: nil,
|
|
wantG22Passed: true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "no assessments at all auto-passes G22 (no critical/high found)",
|
|
assessments: nil,
|
|
mitigations: nil,
|
|
wantG22Passed: true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "critical hazard without mitigation fails G22",
|
|
assessments: []RiskAssessment{{HazardID: hazardID, RiskLevel: RiskLevelCritical}},
|
|
mitigations: nil,
|
|
wantG22Passed: false,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "high hazard without mitigation fails G22",
|
|
assessments: []RiskAssessment{{HazardID: hazardID, RiskLevel: RiskLevelHigh}},
|
|
mitigations: nil,
|
|
wantG22Passed: false,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "critical hazard with mitigation passes G22",
|
|
assessments: []RiskAssessment{{HazardID: hazardID, RiskLevel: RiskLevelCritical}},
|
|
mitigations: []Mitigation{{HazardID: hazardID, Status: MitigationStatusVerified}},
|
|
wantG22Passed: true,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, tt := range tests {
|
|
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
ctx := &CompletenessContext{
|
|
Project: &Project{MachineName: "Test"},
|
|
Assessments: tt.assessments,
|
|
Mitigations: tt.mitigations,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
result := checker.Check(ctx)
|
|
|
|
for _, g := range result.Gates {
|
|
if g.ID == "G22" {
|
|
if g.Passed != tt.wantG22Passed {
|
|
t.Errorf("G22 Passed = %v, want %v", g.Passed, tt.wantG22Passed)
|
|
}
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
t.Error("G22 gate not found in results")
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestCompletenessCheck_G23_MitigationsVerified(t *testing.T) {
|
|
checker := NewCompletenessChecker()
|
|
|
|
hazardID := uuid.New()
|
|
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
mitigations []Mitigation
|
|
wantG23Passed bool
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
name: "no mitigations passes G23",
|
|
mitigations: nil,
|
|
wantG23Passed: true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "all mitigations verified passes G23",
|
|
mitigations: []Mitigation{
|
|
{HazardID: hazardID, Status: MitigationStatusVerified},
|
|
{HazardID: hazardID, Status: MitigationStatusVerified},
|
|
},
|
|
wantG23Passed: true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "one mitigation still implemented fails G23",
|
|
mitigations: []Mitigation{
|
|
{HazardID: hazardID, Status: MitigationStatusVerified},
|
|
{HazardID: hazardID, Status: MitigationStatusImplemented},
|
|
},
|
|
wantG23Passed: false,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "planned mitigations fail G23 (not yet verified)",
|
|
mitigations: []Mitigation{
|
|
{HazardID: hazardID, Status: MitigationStatusPlanned},
|
|
},
|
|
wantG23Passed: false,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "rejected mitigations pass G23",
|
|
mitigations: []Mitigation{
|
|
{HazardID: hazardID, Status: MitigationStatusRejected},
|
|
},
|
|
wantG23Passed: true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "mix of verified planned rejected fails G23",
|
|
mitigations: []Mitigation{
|
|
{HazardID: hazardID, Status: MitigationStatusVerified},
|
|
{HazardID: hazardID, Status: MitigationStatusPlanned},
|
|
{HazardID: hazardID, Status: MitigationStatusRejected},
|
|
},
|
|
wantG23Passed: false,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "mix of verified and rejected passes G23",
|
|
mitigations: []Mitigation{
|
|
{HazardID: hazardID, Status: MitigationStatusVerified},
|
|
{HazardID: hazardID, Status: MitigationStatusRejected},
|
|
},
|
|
wantG23Passed: true,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, tt := range tests {
|
|
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
ctx := &CompletenessContext{
|
|
Project: &Project{MachineName: "Test"},
|
|
Mitigations: tt.mitigations,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
result := checker.Check(ctx)
|
|
|
|
for _, g := range result.Gates {
|
|
if g.ID == "G23" {
|
|
if g.Passed != tt.wantG23Passed {
|
|
t.Errorf("G23 Passed = %v, want %v", g.Passed, tt.wantG23Passed)
|
|
}
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
t.Error("G23 gate not found in results")
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestCompletenessCheck_G09_PatternMatchingPerformed(t *testing.T) {
|
|
checker := NewCompletenessChecker()
|
|
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
performed bool
|
|
wantG09Passed bool
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
name: "pattern matching not performed fails G09",
|
|
performed: false,
|
|
wantG09Passed: false,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "pattern matching performed passes G09",
|
|
performed: true,
|
|
wantG09Passed: true,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, tt := range tests {
|
|
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
ctx := &CompletenessContext{
|
|
Project: &Project{MachineName: "Test"},
|
|
PatternMatchingPerformed: tt.performed,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
result := checker.Check(ctx)
|
|
|
|
for _, g := range result.Gates {
|
|
if g.ID == "G09" {
|
|
if g.Passed != tt.wantG09Passed {
|
|
t.Errorf("G09 Passed = %v, want %v", g.Passed, tt.wantG09Passed)
|
|
}
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
t.Error("G09 gate not found in results")
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestCompletenessCheck_G24_ResidualRiskAccepted(t *testing.T) {
|
|
checker := NewCompletenessChecker()
|
|
|
|
hazardID := uuid.New()
|
|
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
assessments []RiskAssessment
|
|
wantG24Passed bool
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
name: "no assessments fails G24",
|
|
assessments: nil,
|
|
wantG24Passed: false,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "all assessments acceptable passes G24",
|
|
assessments: []RiskAssessment{
|
|
{HazardID: hazardID, IsAcceptable: true, RiskLevel: RiskLevelMedium},
|
|
{HazardID: hazardID, IsAcceptable: true, RiskLevel: RiskLevelHigh},
|
|
},
|
|
wantG24Passed: true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "not acceptable but low risk passes G24",
|
|
assessments: []RiskAssessment{
|
|
{HazardID: hazardID, IsAcceptable: false, RiskLevel: RiskLevelLow},
|
|
},
|
|
wantG24Passed: true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "not acceptable but negligible risk passes G24",
|
|
assessments: []RiskAssessment{
|
|
{HazardID: hazardID, IsAcceptable: false, RiskLevel: RiskLevelNegligible},
|
|
},
|
|
wantG24Passed: true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "not acceptable with high risk fails G24",
|
|
assessments: []RiskAssessment{
|
|
{HazardID: hazardID, IsAcceptable: false, RiskLevel: RiskLevelHigh},
|
|
},
|
|
wantG24Passed: false,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "not acceptable with critical risk fails G24",
|
|
assessments: []RiskAssessment{
|
|
{HazardID: hazardID, IsAcceptable: false, RiskLevel: RiskLevelCritical},
|
|
},
|
|
wantG24Passed: false,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "not acceptable with medium risk fails G24",
|
|
assessments: []RiskAssessment{
|
|
{HazardID: hazardID, IsAcceptable: false, RiskLevel: RiskLevelMedium},
|
|
},
|
|
wantG24Passed: false,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "mix acceptable and unacceptable high fails G24",
|
|
assessments: []RiskAssessment{
|
|
{HazardID: hazardID, IsAcceptable: true, RiskLevel: RiskLevelHigh},
|
|
{HazardID: hazardID, IsAcceptable: false, RiskLevel: RiskLevelHigh},
|
|
},
|
|
wantG24Passed: false,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, tt := range tests {
|
|
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
ctx := &CompletenessContext{
|
|
Project: &Project{MachineName: "Test"},
|
|
Assessments: tt.assessments,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
result := checker.Check(ctx)
|
|
|
|
for _, g := range result.Gates {
|
|
if g.ID == "G24" {
|
|
if g.Passed != tt.wantG24Passed {
|
|
t.Errorf("G24 Passed = %v, want %v", g.Passed, tt.wantG24Passed)
|
|
}
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
t.Error("G24 gate not found in results")
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestCompletenessCheck_ScoringFormula(t *testing.T) {
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
passedRequired int
|
|
totalRequired int
|
|
passedRecommended int
|
|
totalRecommended int
|
|
passedOptional int
|
|
totalOptional int
|
|
wantScore float64
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
name: "all zeros produces zero score",
|
|
passedRequired: 0,
|
|
totalRequired: 0,
|
|
passedRecommended: 0,
|
|
totalRecommended: 0,
|
|
passedOptional: 0,
|
|
totalOptional: 0,
|
|
wantScore: 0,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "all required passed gives 80",
|
|
passedRequired: 20,
|
|
totalRequired: 20,
|
|
passedRecommended: 0,
|
|
totalRecommended: 1,
|
|
passedOptional: 0,
|
|
totalOptional: 0,
|
|
wantScore: 80,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "half required passed gives 40",
|
|
passedRequired: 10,
|
|
totalRequired: 20,
|
|
passedRecommended: 0,
|
|
totalRecommended: 1,
|
|
passedOptional: 0,
|
|
totalOptional: 0,
|
|
wantScore: 40,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "all required and all recommended gives 95",
|
|
passedRequired: 20,
|
|
totalRequired: 20,
|
|
passedRecommended: 1,
|
|
totalRecommended: 1,
|
|
passedOptional: 0,
|
|
totalOptional: 0,
|
|
wantScore: 95,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "all categories full gives 100",
|
|
passedRequired: 20,
|
|
totalRequired: 20,
|
|
passedRecommended: 1,
|
|
totalRecommended: 1,
|
|
passedOptional: 1,
|
|
totalOptional: 1,
|
|
wantScore: 100,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "only recommended passed",
|
|
passedRequired: 0,
|
|
totalRequired: 20,
|
|
passedRecommended: 1,
|
|
totalRecommended: 1,
|
|
passedOptional: 0,
|
|
totalOptional: 0,
|
|
wantScore: 15,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, tt := range tests {
|
|
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
score := calculateWeightedScore(
|
|
tt.passedRequired, tt.totalRequired,
|
|
tt.passedRecommended, tt.totalRecommended,
|
|
tt.passedOptional, tt.totalOptional,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
if math.Abs(score-tt.wantScore) > 0.01 {
|
|
t.Errorf("calculateWeightedScore = %f, want %f", score, tt.wantScore)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestCompletenessCheck_GateCountsAndCategories(t *testing.T) {
|
|
checker := NewCompletenessChecker()
|
|
|
|
ctx := &CompletenessContext{
|
|
Project: &Project{MachineName: "Test"},
|
|
}
|
|
result := checker.Check(ctx)
|
|
|
|
// The buildGateDefinitions function returns exactly 22 gates
|
|
// (G01-G08: 8, G09: 1, G10-G13: 4, G20-G24: 5, G30: 1, G40-G42: 3 = 22 total)
|
|
if len(result.Gates) != 22 {
|
|
t.Errorf("Total gates = %d, want 22", len(result.Gates))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Count required vs recommended
|
|
requiredCount := 0
|
|
recommendedCount := 0
|
|
for _, g := range result.Gates {
|
|
if g.Required {
|
|
requiredCount++
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
// G09 and G30 are recommended gates (Required=false, Recommended=true)
|
|
// All others are required (20 required, 2 recommended)
|
|
if requiredCount != 20 {
|
|
t.Errorf("Required gates count = %d, want 20", requiredCount)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if result.TotalRequired != 20 {
|
|
t.Errorf("TotalRequired = %d, want 20", result.TotalRequired)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TotalRecommended should be 2 (G09, G30)
|
|
if result.TotalRecommended != 2 {
|
|
t.Errorf("TotalRecommended = %d, want 2", result.TotalRecommended)
|
|
}
|
|
_ = recommendedCount
|
|
|
|
// Verify expected categories exist
|
|
categories := make(map[string]int)
|
|
for _, g := range result.Gates {
|
|
categories[g.Category]++
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expectedCategories := map[string]int{
|
|
"onboarding": 9, // G01-G08 + G09 (recommended)
|
|
"classification": 4,
|
|
"hazard_risk": 5,
|
|
"evidence": 1,
|
|
"tech_file": 3,
|
|
}
|
|
for cat, expectedCount := range expectedCategories {
|
|
if categories[cat] != expectedCount {
|
|
t.Errorf("Category %q count = %d, want %d", cat, categories[cat], expectedCount)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestCompletenessCheck_FailedGateHasDetails(t *testing.T) {
|
|
checker := NewCompletenessChecker()
|
|
|
|
ctx := &CompletenessContext{
|
|
Project: &Project{}, // empty project, many gates will fail
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
result := checker.Check(ctx)
|
|
|
|
for _, g := range result.Gates {
|
|
if !g.Passed && g.Details == "" {
|
|
t.Errorf("Gate %s failed but has empty Details", g.ID)
|
|
}
|
|
if g.Passed && g.Details != "" {
|
|
t.Errorf("Gate %s passed but has non-empty Details: %s", g.ID, g.Details)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|