Adressiert das BMW-Beispiel (740 Cookies, Salesforce als "essential"
mit 1-Jahres-Lifetime, Pseudo-Zwecke wie "Siehe dazugehörige
Datenverarbeitung"). User-Konzept "Regulation als Code".
Step 1 — cookie_library_lookup.py (3 Layer):
1. Override = cookie_knowledge_db.py + extended (74) für
Schrems-II / EUGH / EU-Alternative — BreakPilot-juristische-IP.
2. Truth-Base = compliance.cookie_library (2287 aus Open Cookie
Database, CC0). actual_category als Wahrheit.
3. Auto-Learning = cookie_behavior_audits — Cross-Site-Konsens
wenn ≥3 Sites denselben Cookie melden.
Match: exact > prefix (mit Separator-Check) > wildcard. Kurze
Library-Namen ("c", "ID") brauchen exact-match — verhindert
False-Positive auf "completely_unknown". Trailing-Underscore
in OCD ("guest_uuid_essential_") wird als implicit-wildcard
interpretiert.
Step 2 — cookie_coherence_check.py (B19, 6 Finding-Typen):
- MARKETING_AS_ESSENTIAL (HIGH): KB sagt actual=marketing, Site
deklariert essential/erforderlich → Einwilligung wird umgangen
- LIFETIME_TOO_LONG_FOR_ESSENTIAL (MED): essential + >90d
- PSEUDO_PURPOSE (LOW): "Siehe dazugehörige Datenverarbeitung"
/ <4 Wörter (suppressed wenn Vendor-Purpose substantial ist)
- MISSING_COUNTRY (LOW): vendor_country leer trotz KB-Hit
- UNKNOWN_VENDOR (LOW): nicht in KB → Auto-Learning-Kandidat
- DUPLICATE_VENDOR (MED): selber Vendor in N Kategorien =
Stack-Aufspaltung um Marketing unter "essential" zu schmuggeln
Jedes Finding mit recommended_action ("Cookie X aus 'erforderlich'
raus und in 'Marketing' setzen").
Step 3 — cookie_observation_logger.py:
Loggt nach jedem Audit alle (cookie, site, declared_purpose) in
compliance.cookie_behavior_audits → Basis für Cross-Site-Konsens
in Layer 3.
Step 4 — cookie_csv_exporter.py:
cookies-full-{check_id}.csv mit 21 Spalten (Name, Vendor decl/KB,
Cat decl/KB, Lifetime decl/KB, Country, Opt-Out, 8x FIND_* flags,
recommended_action). UTF-8 BOM für Excel.
ZIP-Attachment: erweitert audit_walk_zip_builder um extra_files=
parameter; phase_e ruft mit cookies-full-...csv auf.
Step 5 — mail_render_v2/_vendor_cards.py:
Statt 740 Cookie-Rows: Aggregation pro Vendor mit Cookie-Count +
Issue-Count + 1-2 Beispiel-Cookies + Issue-Type-Tags. Top 30
Vendoren in der Mail, Rest nur in CSV. Sortiert nach Issue-Score.
Step 6 — render_info_box_rechtsrahmen():
Generic Header-Info-Box mit Art. 13 DSGVO + § 25 TDDDG + Art. 5
+ § 5 UWG + § 30/130 OWiG. Immer angezeigt, kein explicit-
finding-mapping (User-mündigkeit).
Orchestrator + _compose: run_b19 + render_vendor_cards +
render_info_box_rechtsrahmen ins V2-Layout.
Tests: 28/28 grün (15 lookup + 13 coherence).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
breakpilot-compliance
DSGVO/AI-Act compliance platform — 10 services, Go · Python · TypeScript
Overview
breakpilot-compliance is a multi-tenant DSGVO/EU AI Act compliance platform that provides an SDK for consent management, data subject requests (DSR), audit logging, iACE impact assessments, and document archival. It ships as 10 containerised services covering an admin dashboard, a developer portal, a Python/FastAPI backend, a Go AI compliance engine, TTS, and a decentralised document store on IPFS. Every service is deployed automatically via Gitea Actions → Orca on every push to main.
Architecture
| Service | Tech | Port | Container |
|---|---|---|---|
| admin-compliance | Next.js 15 | 3007 | bp-compliance-admin |
| backend-compliance | Python / FastAPI 0.123 | 8002 | bp-compliance-backend |
| ai-compliance-sdk | Go 1.24 / Gin | 8093 | bp-compliance-ai-sdk |
| developer-portal | Next.js 15 | 3006 | bp-compliance-developer-portal |
| breakpilot-compliance-sdk | TypeScript SDK (React/Vue/Angular/vanilla) | — | — |
| consent-sdk | JS/TS Consent SDK | — | — |
| compliance-tts-service | Python / Piper TTS | 8095 | bp-compliance-tts |
| document-crawler | Python / FastAPI | 8098 | bp-compliance-document-crawler |
| dsms-gateway | Python / FastAPI / IPFS | 8082 | bp-compliance-dsms-gateway |
| dsms-node | IPFS Kubo v0.24.0 | — | bp-compliance-dsms-node |
All containers share the external breakpilot-network Docker network and depend on breakpilot-core (Valkey, Vault, RAG service, Nginx reverse proxy).
Quick Start
Prerequisites: Docker, Go 1.24+, Python 3.12+, Node.js 20+
git clone ssh://git@gitea.meghsakha.com:22222/Benjamin_Boenisch/breakpilot-compliance.git
cd breakpilot-compliance
# Copy and populate secrets (never commit .env)
cp .env.example .env
# Start all services
docker compose up -d
For the Orca/Hetzner production target (x86_64), use the override:
docker compose -f docker-compose.yml -f docker-compose.hetzner.yml up -d
Development Workflow
Use feature branches off main. Supported prefixes: feat/, feature/, hotfix/.
git checkout main && git pull origin main
git checkout -b feat/my-change
# ... make changes ...
git push origin feat/my-change
# Open a PR → squash merge to main
Push to main triggers:
- Gitea Actions — lint → test → validate (see CI Pipeline below)
- Orca — automatic build + deploy (~3 min total)
Monitor status: https://gitea.meghsakha.com/Benjamin_Boenisch/breakpilot-compliance/actions
CI Pipeline
Defined in .gitea/workflows/ci.yaml.
| Job | What it checks |
|---|---|
loc-budget |
All source files ≤ 500 LOC; soft target 300 |
guardrail-integrity |
Commits touching guardrail files carry [guardrail-change] |
go-lint |
golangci-lint on ai-compliance-sdk/ |
python-lint |
ruff + mypy on Python services |
nodejs-lint |
tsc --noEmit + ESLint on Next.js services |
test-go-ai-compliance |
go test ./... in ai-compliance-sdk/ |
test-python-backend-compliance |
pytest in backend-compliance/ |
test-python-document-crawler |
pytest in document-crawler/ |
test-python-dsms-gateway |
pytest test_main.py in dsms-gateway/ |
sbom-scan |
License + vulnerability scan via syft + grype |
validate-canonical-controls |
OpenAPI contract baseline diff |
File Budget
| Limit | Value | How to check |
|---|---|---|
| Soft target | 300 LOC | bash scripts/check-loc.sh |
| Hard cap | 500 LOC | Same; also enforced by PreToolUse hook + git pre-commit + CI |
| Exceptions | .claude/rules/loc-exceptions.txt |
Require written rationale + [guardrail-change] commit marker |
The .claude/settings.json PreToolUse hook blocks Claude Code from writing or editing files that would exceed the hard cap. The git pre-commit hook re-checks. CI is the final gate.
Links
| URL | |
|---|---|
| Admin dashboard | https://admin-dev.breakpilot.ai |
| Developer portal | https://developers-dev.breakpilot.ai |
| Backend API | https://api-dev.breakpilot.ai |
| AI SDK API | https://sdk-dev.breakpilot.ai |
| Gitea repo | https://gitea.meghsakha.com/Benjamin_Boenisch/breakpilot-compliance |
| Gitea Actions | https://gitea.meghsakha.com/Benjamin_Boenisch/breakpilot-compliance/actions |