Files
breakpilot-compliance/ai-compliance-sdk/internal/ucca/legal_rag_intent_test.go
T
Benjamin Admin a5b675d999
CI / detect-changes (pull_request) Successful in 6s
CI / branch-name (pull_request) Successful in 1s
CI / guardrail-integrity (pull_request) Successful in 6s
CI / secret-scan (pull_request) Successful in 7s
CI / dep-audit (pull_request) Failing after 56s
CI / sbom-scan (pull_request) Failing after 57s
CI / build-sha-integrity (pull_request) Successful in 10s
CI / validate-canonical-controls (pull_request) Successful in 7s
CI / loc-budget (pull_request) Successful in 20s
CI / go-lint (pull_request) Successful in 48s
CI / python-lint (pull_request) Failing after 15s
CI / nodejs-lint (pull_request) Failing after 1m12s
CI / nodejs-build (pull_request) Successful in 3m20s
CI / test-go (pull_request) Successful in 56s
CI / iace-gt-coverage (pull_request) Successful in 15s
CI / test-python-backend (pull_request) Successful in 27s
CI / test-python-document-crawler (pull_request) Successful in 13s
CI / test-python-dsms-gateway (pull_request) Successful in 9s
feat(ai-sdk): control-intent — technical_standard may win implementation questions
Mirror the guidance interpretation-intent (PR #35) for control frameworks: when a
query explicitly asks HOW to implement / which controls or measures fit (control,
maßnahme, umsetzen, härten, nist, owasp, grundschutz, ...), a semantically
competitive technical_standard is lifted just above the best binding hit — so
"Welche Controls passen zu Security Updates?" can return NIST/OWASP Top-1, while
"Welche Anforderungen bestehen an Security Updates?" keeps CRA (binding) Top-1.

Generalize applyGuidanceIntent -> liftAboveBinding(sourceClass) and reuse it for
both supervisory_guidance (interpretation intent) and technical_standard
(implementation intent). Same semantic guard keeps off-topic sources demoted.
Rename the shared coefficients guidanceIntent* -> intentLift*.

Tested: queryWantsControls detection + 3 rerank cases (standard wins on control
question, binding stays on norm question, off-topic standard blocked by guard).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-24 11:49:49 +02:00

135 lines
4.8 KiB
Go

package ucca
import "testing"
func intentRes(reg, sourceClass string, sem float64, weight int) LegalSearchResult {
return LegalSearchResult{
RegulationShort: reg, SourceClass: sourceClass, Score: sem,
AuthorityWeight: weight, Jurisdiction: "EU",
}
}
func TestQueryWantsGuidance(t *testing.T) {
wants := []string{
"Was empfiehlt der EDPB zum DSB?",
"Was sagt die ENISA zu Security Updates?",
"laut DSK ...",
"Orientierungshilfe zur DSFA",
"Welche BSI-Empfehlung gilt?",
"Auslegung der Aufsichtsbehörde",
}
plain := []string{
"Ab wann braucht man einen Datenschutzbeauftragten?",
"Welche Anforderungen bestehen an Security Updates?",
}
for _, q := range wants {
if !queryWantsGuidance(q) {
t.Errorf("should detect interpretation intent: %q", q)
}
}
for _, q := range plain {
if queryWantsGuidance(q) {
t.Errorf("should NOT detect intent (norm question): %q", q)
}
}
}
func TestRerank_NormQuestion_BindingStaysTop(t *testing.T) {
// No intent signal → binding wins even though guidance is semantically higher.
results := []LegalSearchResult{
intentRes("EDPB DPO", "supervisory_guidance", 0.64, 70),
intentRes("DSGVO", "binding_law", 0.58, 100),
}
out := rerankByAuthority("Ab wann braucht man einen Datenschutzbeauftragten?", results)
if out[0].SourceClass != "binding_law" {
t.Errorf("norm question: binding must stay Top-1, got %s", out[0].SourceClass)
}
}
func TestRerank_InterpretationQuestion_GuidanceMayWin(t *testing.T) {
// Explicit intent + guidance semantically competitive → guidance wins.
results := []LegalSearchResult{
intentRes("EDPB DPO", "supervisory_guidance", 0.64, 70),
intentRes("DSGVO", "binding_law", 0.58, 100),
}
out := rerankByAuthority("Was empfiehlt der EDPB zum Datenschutzbeauftragten?", results)
if out[0].SourceClass != "supervisory_guidance" {
t.Errorf("interpretation question: guidance should win Top-1, got %s", out[0].SourceClass)
}
}
func TestRerank_OffTopicGuidance_BlockedByGuard(t *testing.T) {
// Intent present, but guidance semantic is far below the best binding hit →
// the margin guard keeps binding on top (no off-topic guideline override).
results := []LegalSearchResult{
intentRes("EDPB DPO", "supervisory_guidance", 0.40, 70),
intentRes("DSGVO", "binding_law", 0.58, 100),
}
out := rerankByAuthority("Was empfiehlt der EDPB zum Datenschutzbeauftragten?", results)
if out[0].SourceClass != "binding_law" {
t.Errorf("off-topic guidance must not win even with intent, got %s", out[0].SourceClass)
}
}
func TestQueryWantsControls(t *testing.T) {
wants := []string{
"Welche Controls passen zu Security Updates?",
"Welche Maßnahmen sollten wir umsetzen?",
"Wie härten wir den Server ab?",
"Gibt es NIST-Controls dafür?",
"OWASP Best Practice für Logging?",
"BSI Grundschutz Bausteine",
}
plain := []string{
"Welche Anforderungen bestehen an Security Updates?",
"Ab wann braucht man einen Datenschutzbeauftragten?",
}
for _, q := range wants {
if !queryWantsControls(q) {
t.Errorf("should detect control/implementation intent: %q", q)
}
}
for _, q := range plain {
if queryWantsControls(q) {
t.Errorf("should NOT detect control intent (norm question): %q", q)
}
}
}
func TestRerank_ControlQuestion_StandardMayWin(t *testing.T) {
// Explicit implementation intent + standard semantically competitive → standard wins.
results := []LegalSearchResult{
intentRes("NIST SP 800-82", "technical_standard", 0.62, 80),
intentRes("CRA", "binding_law", 0.58, 100),
}
out := rerankByAuthority("Welche Controls passen zu Security Updates?", results)
if out[0].SourceClass != "technical_standard" {
t.Errorf("control question: technical_standard should win Top-1, got %s", out[0].SourceClass)
}
}
func TestRerank_NormQuestion_BindingOverStandard(t *testing.T) {
// "Anforderungen" → no control intent → binding stays Top-1 over the standard.
results := []LegalSearchResult{
intentRes("NIST SP 800-82", "technical_standard", 0.62, 80),
intentRes("CRA", "binding_law", 0.58, 100),
}
out := rerankByAuthority("Welche Anforderungen bestehen an Security Updates?", results)
if out[0].SourceClass != "binding_law" {
t.Errorf("norm question: binding must stay Top-1 over standard, got %s", out[0].SourceClass)
}
}
func TestRerank_OffTopicStandard_BlockedByGuard(t *testing.T) {
// Control intent present, but the standard is semantically far below binding →
// the margin guard keeps binding Top-1 (no off-topic standard override).
results := []LegalSearchResult{
intentRes("NIST SP 800-82", "technical_standard", 0.40, 80),
intentRes("CRA", "binding_law", 0.58, 100),
}
out := rerankByAuthority("Welche Controls passen zu Security Updates?", results)
if out[0].SourceClass != "binding_law" {
t.Errorf("off-topic standard must not win even with control intent, got %s", out[0].SourceClass)
}
}