Files
breakpilot-compliance/backend-compliance/compliance/transition_reasoning/schemas.py
T
Benjamin Admin 77de7e794c feat(transition): Transition Reasoning v0 (RS-005) — Transition Planning Engine
Second reasoning mode, scope per user: the engine owns the INFORMATION GAPS, not the
questions. assess_transition(context, target_requirements, company_profile) emits
ranked TransitionQuestionRequest {capability, control, reason, question_intent,
expected_evidence, priority, information_gain} -- NOT rendered question text. Rendering
(intent+subject->sentence) is a separate swappable layer (RS-005.1), not here.

Consumes the Company Capability Profile (2A) as "have" + injected TargetRequirement
(Execution-owned placeholder) as "required" -- no required-capability data in product
code (EMPTY_REQUIREMENTS, mocks only in tests). A certification-derived capability is
probably_covered (Welt 1) -> a confirmation request, never already_covered/"erfuellt".
Deterministic, computed-not-stored, no percentages.

Activates 2A/2C/RCI (first consumer of the Company profile). Freeze-respecting: additive
package, no new graph/base class/meta-model class. 9 tests, mypy --strict clean, LOC ok.
No endpoint/UI/RAG; question rendering deliberately deferred to RS-005.1.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-27 07:31:11 +02:00

111 lines
4.2 KiB
Python

"""Transition Reasoning v0 (RS-005) — domain objects.
The **Transition Planning Engine**: it answers „Was muss ich noch wissen, um vom
Ausgangszustand in den regulatorischen Zielzustand zu kommen?" — NOT „wie frage ich
das?". It therefore owns the **information gaps** (`TransitionQuestionRequest`), never
the rendered question text. Rendering (intent + subject -> sentence) is a separate,
swappable layer (RS-005.1 Question Generator) and is NOT part of this engine.
v0 consumes the Company Capability Profile (Phase 2A) as the „have" state and an
INJECTED list of `TargetRequirement` as the Execution-owned „required" side (no
required-capability data in product code — same discipline as 2A's EMPTY_MAPPING).
Welt-1-Grenze: a probable coverage (from a certification) is a hint, never „erfüllt";
it produces a confirmation request, not a verdict. Application/reasoning types, NOT
meta-model classes (freeze v1.0 untouched). Python 3.9 compatible (no `|` unions).
"""
from __future__ import annotations
from enum import Enum
from typing import List, Optional
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
class TargetType(str, Enum):
REGULATION = "regulation"
CERTIFICATION = "certification"
FRAMEWORK = "framework"
class CoverageStatus(str, Enum):
ALREADY_COVERED = "already_covered" # confirmed in the company profile
PROBABLY_COVERED = "probably_covered" # inferred (e.g. from a certification)
NEEDS_CONFIRMATION = "needs_confirmation" # only declared / weak signal
MISSING = "missing" # no signal
NOT_APPLICABLE = "not_applicable"
UNSUPPORTED = "unsupported" # domain not yet in the corpus (future_corpus_needed)
class RequestPriority(str, Enum):
HIGH = "high"
MEDIUM = "medium"
LOW = "low"
class InformationGain(str, Enum):
HIGH = "high"
MEDIUM = "medium"
LOW = "low"
class TransitionGoal(BaseModel):
target_id: str # e.g. "CRA", "TISAX"
target_type: TargetType = TargetType.REGULATION
label: str = ""
class TransitionContext(BaseModel):
company_id: str = ""
known_certifications: List[str] = Field(default_factory=list)
known_regulations: List[str] = Field(default_factory=list)
target: TransitionGoal
# ── INJECTED (Execution-owned): what the target requires ───────────────────
class TargetRequirement(BaseModel):
"""One required capability for the target. In v0 injected; later resolved from
`Obligation -> Control -> Required Capability` + `Control -> question_intent`."""
capability_id: str # MCAP-...
question_intent: str = "verify_existence" # passed through to the request, not rendered
expected_evidence: List[str] = Field(default_factory=list)
source_control_id: Optional[str] = None
supports_obligations: List[str] = Field(default_factory=list)
unsupported: bool = False # domain not yet in the corpus
# ── the OWNED output: an information gap, NOT a question ───────────────────
class TransitionQuestionRequest(BaseModel):
capability_id: str
control_id: Optional[str] = None
reason: str
question_intent: str # verify_existence / determine_duration / ... (rendered later)
expected_evidence: List[str] = Field(default_factory=list)
priority: RequestPriority
information_gain: InformationGain
class CapabilityCoverage(BaseModel):
capability_id: str
status: CoverageStatus
have_status: Optional[str] = None # the 2A VerificationStatus that drove it
class TransitionSummary(BaseModel):
headline: str = "" # counts, NO percentage
what_to_clarify: List[str] = Field(default_factory=list) # capability_ids with a request
already_covered: List[str] = Field(default_factory=list)
probably_covered: List[str] = Field(default_factory=list)
missing: List[str] = Field(default_factory=list)
not_applicable: List[str] = Field(default_factory=list)
unsupported: List[str] = Field(default_factory=list)
class TransitionAssessment(BaseModel):
target_id: str
coverage: List[CapabilityCoverage] = Field(default_factory=list)
question_requests: List[TransitionQuestionRequest] = Field(default_factory=list) # ranked
summary: TransitionSummary