Files
breakpilot-compliance/backend-compliance
Benjamin Admin e50f3dfbee
CI / loc-budget (push) Failing after 18s
CI / secret-scan (push) Has been skipped
CI / go-lint (push) Has been skipped
Build + Deploy / build-admin-compliance (push) Successful in 9s
Build + Deploy / build-backend-compliance (push) Successful in 10s
Build + Deploy / build-ai-sdk (push) Successful in 9s
Build + Deploy / build-developer-portal (push) Successful in 8s
Build + Deploy / build-tts (push) Successful in 8s
Build + Deploy / build-document-crawler (push) Successful in 8s
Build + Deploy / build-dsms-gateway (push) Successful in 8s
Build + Deploy / build-dsms-node (push) Successful in 8s
CI / branch-name (push) Has been skipped
CI / guardrail-integrity (push) Has been skipped
CI / nodejs-build (push) Successful in 3m22s
CI / dep-audit (push) Has been skipped
CI / python-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / nodejs-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / sbom-scan (push) Has been skipped
CI / test-go (push) Failing after 49s
CI / test-python-backend (push) Successful in 43s
CI / test-python-document-crawler (push) Successful in 32s
CI / test-python-dsms-gateway (push) Successful in 26s
CI / validate-canonical-controls (push) Successful in 18s
Build + Deploy / trigger-orca (push) Successful in 2m10s
feat: All 138 hints rewritten as expert-level legal guidance
Every hint now reads like a mini-consultation from a data protection
lawyer — with specific legal references, court rulings, and common
mistakes. Examples:

- EuGH C-210/16 (Fanpage), C-298/17 (Kontaktpflicht), C-311/18 (Schrems II)
- BGH I ZR 228/03 (ladungsfaehige Anschrift), XI ZR 388/10 (AGB)
- EDSA Guidelines 2/2019 (lit. b misuse), WP 248 Rev.01 (DSFA)
- DSK-Orientierungshilfe, CNIL-Leitlinien, SDM, BSI-IT-Grundschutz
- §25 TDDDG, §38 BDSG, §309 BGB, §312k BGB, Art. 246a EGBGB

This is the core value proposition: no lawyer can deliver this level
of specific, actionable compliance feedback in 60 seconds.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-07 17:13:37 +02:00
..

backend-compliance

Python/FastAPI service implementing the DSGVO compliance API: DSR, DSFA, consent, controls, risks, evidence, audit, vendor management, ISMS, change requests, document generation.

Port: 8002 (container: bp-compliance-backend) Stack: Python 3.12, FastAPI, SQLAlchemy 2.x, Alembic, Keycloak auth.

Architecture

compliance/
├── api/            # Routers (thin, ≤30 LOC per handler)
├── services/       # Business logic
├── repositories/   # DB access
├── domain/         # Value objects, domain errors
├── schemas/        # Pydantic models, split per domain
└── db/models/      # SQLAlchemy ORM, one module per aggregate

The service follows this layered target structure but not all files are fully refactored yet. Phase 1 backlog is tracked in .claude/rules/loc-exceptions.txt (27 backend-compliance files currently excepted).

See ../AGENTS.python.md for the full convention and ../.claude/rules/architecture.md for the non-negotiable rules.

Run locally

cd backend-compliance
pip install -r requirements.txt
export COMPLIANCE_DATABASE_URL=...  # Postgres (Hetzner or local)
uvicorn main:app --reload --port 8002

Tests

pytest compliance/tests/ -v
pytest --cov=compliance --cov-report=term-missing

Layout: tests/unit/, tests/integration/, tests/contracts/. Contract tests diff /openapi.json against tests/contracts/openapi.baseline.json.

Public API surface

404+ endpoints across /api/v1/*. Grouped by domain: ai, audit, consent, dsfa, dsr, gdpr, vendor, evidence, change-requests, generation, projects, company-profile, isms. Every path is a contract — see the "Public endpoints" rule in the root CLAUDE.md.

Environment

Var Purpose
COMPLIANCE_DATABASE_URL Postgres DSN, sslmode=require
KEYCLOAK_* Auth verification
QDRANT_URL, QDRANT_API_KEY Vector search
CORE_VALKEY_URL Session cache

Don't touch

Database schema, __tablename__, column names, existing migrations under migrations/. See root CLAUDE.md rule 3.