c4d9b1426f
CI / build-sha-integrity (push) Failing after 4s
CI / validate-canonical-controls (push) Successful in 11s
CI / loc-budget (push) Failing after 15s
CI / go-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / detect-changes (push) Successful in 6s
CI / branch-name (push) Has been skipped
CI / guardrail-integrity (push) Has been skipped
CI / secret-scan (push) Has been skipped
CI / dep-audit (push) Has been skipped
CI / sbom-scan (push) Has been skipped
CI / python-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / nodejs-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / nodejs-build (push) Has been skipped
CI / test-go (push) Failing after 37s
CI / iace-gt-coverage (push) Successful in 23s
CI / test-python-backend (push) Has been skipped
CI / test-python-document-crawler (push) Has been skipped
CI / test-python-dsms-gateway (push) Has been skipped
Diagnosis: engine F mean 3.56 vs professional 2.56; the dominant disagreement was normal-operation hazards getting F=4 where the professional assigned 2. Lowered the lifecycle→F mapping (normal operation 4→3, occasional phases 3→2). New TestGT_RiskComparison_CrossGT runs the exact production comparison on BOTH GTs: F within±1 rose to 95% (robot cell) and 94% (lift) — generic, not lift-tuned. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
305 lines
12 KiB
Go
305 lines
12 KiB
Go
package iace
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"math"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// ============================================================================
|
|
// Risk benchmark: engine risk parameters vs. the professional's (Fachmann) GT.
|
|
//
|
|
// The risk numbers have never been validated. This test measures — for the
|
|
// first time — how far the engine's per-pattern risk defaults are from the
|
|
// professional's EN-62061-style assessment in the ground truth, for every
|
|
// matched hazard across both GTs.
|
|
//
|
|
// COPYRIGHT NOTE: this test only COMPARES numbers (our defaults vs the GT's
|
|
// values) and computes agreement statistics. It does NOT reproduce any DIN/
|
|
// Beuth/ISO risk-graph table, parameter decision tree, or normative formula.
|
|
// The GT values are the professional's assessment of a specific machine, not
|
|
// the standard's text. Any future estimator must likewise derive parameters
|
|
// from OUR own model + PUBLIC accident data (ESAW/DGUV), never from a
|
|
// transcribed norm table.
|
|
//
|
|
// Parameter mapping (engine default -> GT column, EN-62061 naming):
|
|
//
|
|
// DefaultSeverity <-> GT.S (Se, severity)
|
|
// DefaultExposure <-> GT.F (Fr, frequency / duration of exposure)
|
|
// DefaultAvoidability <-> GT.P (Av, possibility of avoidance)
|
|
// (none) <-> GT.W (Pr, probability of occurrence) <-- the gap
|
|
//
|
|
// Run with:
|
|
//
|
|
// go test -v -vet=off -run TestGT_RiskBenchmark ./internal/iace/
|
|
// ============================================================================
|
|
|
|
type riskParams struct {
|
|
s, f, a int // severity, frequency/exposure, avoidability (engine defaults)
|
|
cats []string
|
|
scenario string
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
type axisStats struct {
|
|
n int
|
|
absErrSum float64
|
|
exact int
|
|
within1 int
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (a *axisStats) add(engine, gt int) {
|
|
a.n++
|
|
d := math.Abs(float64(engine - gt))
|
|
a.absErrSum += d
|
|
if d == 0 {
|
|
a.exact++
|
|
}
|
|
if d <= 1 {
|
|
a.within1++
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (a axisStats) mae() float64 {
|
|
if a.n == 0 {
|
|
return 0
|
|
}
|
|
return a.absErrSum / float64(a.n)
|
|
}
|
|
func (a axisStats) pct(x int) float64 {
|
|
if a.n == 0 {
|
|
return 0
|
|
}
|
|
return 100 * float64(x) / float64(a.n)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// kendallConcordance returns the fraction of comparable hazard pairs that the
|
|
// engine orders the same way the professional does (rank agreement, scale-
|
|
// invariant). 1.0 = identical ordering, 0.5 = random, 0.0 = inverted.
|
|
func kendallConcordance(engine, gt []float64) (float64, int) {
|
|
concordant, discordant := 0, 0
|
|
for i := 0; i < len(engine); i++ {
|
|
for j := i + 1; j < len(engine); j++ {
|
|
de := engine[i] - engine[j]
|
|
dg := gt[i] - gt[j]
|
|
if de == 0 || dg == 0 {
|
|
continue // tie on one side: not comparable
|
|
}
|
|
if (de > 0) == (dg > 0) {
|
|
concordant++
|
|
} else {
|
|
discordant++
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
total := concordant + discordant
|
|
if total == 0 {
|
|
return 0, 0
|
|
}
|
|
return float64(concordant) / float64(total), total
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
type riskAgg struct {
|
|
sev, freq, avoid axisStats
|
|
wEst, pEst, sevEst axisStats
|
|
noAvoidDefault int
|
|
engineRisk []float64
|
|
newEngineRisk []float64
|
|
fkRisk []float64
|
|
gtRisk []float64
|
|
matched int
|
|
noParam int
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestGT_RiskCalibrationData logs, per contact mode, the professional's mean
|
|
// W and P vs our current estimate — the input for calibrating contactModeTable.
|
|
func TestGT_RiskCalibrationData(t *testing.T) {
|
|
type acc struct {
|
|
n int
|
|
sumGTW, sumGTP int
|
|
sumEngS, sumGTS int
|
|
estW, estP int
|
|
}
|
|
byMode := map[string]*acc{}
|
|
|
|
for _, c := range gtBenchmarkCases {
|
|
gtData, narrative, _ := readGTNarrative(t, c.path)
|
|
if c.narrativeOverride != "" {
|
|
narrative = c.narrativeOverride
|
|
}
|
|
pr := ParseNarrative(narrative, c.machineType)
|
|
out := NewPatternEngine().Match(parseResultToMatchInput(pr, c.machineType))
|
|
byName := map[string]riskParams{}
|
|
for _, pm := range out.MatchedPatterns {
|
|
key := normalizeDE(pm.ScenarioDE)
|
|
if key == "" {
|
|
key = normalizeDE(pm.PatternName)
|
|
}
|
|
byName[key] = riskParams{s: pm.DefaultSeverity, cats: pm.HazardCats, scenario: pm.ScenarioDE}
|
|
}
|
|
hazards, mitigations := patternsToHazardsAndMitigations(out)
|
|
res := CompareBenchmark(>Data, hazards, mitigations)
|
|
for _, mp := range res.MatchedPairs {
|
|
rp, ok := byName[normalizeDE(mp.EngineHazard.Name)]
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
mode := DetectContactMode(rp.cats, rp.scenario)
|
|
if mode == "" {
|
|
mode = "(none)"
|
|
}
|
|
a := byMode[mode]
|
|
if a == nil {
|
|
a = &acc{estW: EstimateProbabilityW(rp.cats, rp.scenario), estP: EstimateAvoidabilityP(rp.cats, rp.scenario)}
|
|
byMode[mode] = a
|
|
}
|
|
a.n++
|
|
a.sumGTW += mp.GTEntry.RiskIn.W
|
|
a.sumGTP += mp.GTEntry.RiskIn.P
|
|
a.sumEngS += rp.s
|
|
a.sumGTS += mp.GTEntry.RiskIn.S
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
t.Logf("=== Per-contact-mode calibration data (engine vs GT mean) ===")
|
|
t.Logf(" %-18s %4s | %5s %5s | %5s %5s | %6s %6s", "mode", "n", "estW", "gtW̄", "estP", "gtP̄", "engS̄", "gtS̄")
|
|
for mode, a := range byMode {
|
|
t.Logf(" %-18s %4d | %5d %5.1f | %5d %5.1f | %6.1f %6.1f",
|
|
mode, a.n, a.estW, float64(a.sumGTW)/float64(a.n), a.estP, float64(a.sumGTP)/float64(a.n),
|
|
float64(a.sumEngS)/float64(a.n), float64(a.sumGTS)/float64(a.n))
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestGT_RiskComparison_CrossGT runs the EXACT production risk comparison
|
|
// (ComputeRiskComparison) on BOTH ground truths, so any estimator change is
|
|
// validated generically across two different machines (robot cell + lift),
|
|
// not tuned to one.
|
|
func TestGT_RiskComparison_CrossGT(t *testing.T) {
|
|
for _, c := range gtBenchmarkCases {
|
|
gtData, narrative, _ := readGTNarrative(t, c.path)
|
|
if c.narrativeOverride != "" {
|
|
narrative = c.narrativeOverride
|
|
}
|
|
pr := ParseNarrative(narrative, c.machineType)
|
|
out := NewPatternEngine().Match(parseResultToMatchInput(pr, c.machineType))
|
|
hazards, mitigations := patternsToHazardsAndMitigations(out)
|
|
res := CompareBenchmark(>Data, hazards, mitigations)
|
|
_, agg := ComputeRiskComparison(res.MatchedPairs)
|
|
t.Logf("=== %s — ComputeRiskComparison (production) ===", c.name)
|
|
t.Logf(" n=%d | S±1 %.0f%% | F±1 %.0f%% | W±1 %.0f%% | P±1 %.0f%% | Ranking %.0f%%",
|
|
agg.N, agg.SeverityWithin1, agg.FrequencyWithin1, agg.ProbabilityWithin1,
|
|
agg.AvoidanceWithin1, agg.RankConcordance)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestGT_RiskBenchmark(t *testing.T) {
|
|
overall := riskAgg{}
|
|
|
|
for _, c := range gtBenchmarkCases {
|
|
gtData, narrative, _ := readGTNarrative(t, c.path)
|
|
if c.narrativeOverride != "" {
|
|
narrative = c.narrativeOverride
|
|
}
|
|
pr := ParseNarrative(narrative, c.machineType)
|
|
out := NewPatternEngine().Match(parseResultToMatchInput(pr, c.machineType))
|
|
|
|
// Index engine risk params by the hazard name the matcher will see
|
|
// (patternsToHazardsAndMitigations sets Hazard.Name = ScenarioDE, else PatternName).
|
|
byName := map[string]riskParams{}
|
|
for _, pm := range out.MatchedPatterns {
|
|
key := normalizeDE(pm.ScenarioDE)
|
|
if key == "" {
|
|
key = normalizeDE(pm.PatternName)
|
|
}
|
|
byName[key] = riskParams{s: pm.DefaultSeverity, f: pm.DefaultExposure, a: pm.DefaultAvoidability, cats: pm.HazardCats, scenario: pm.ScenarioDE}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
hazards, mitigations := patternsToHazardsAndMitigations(out)
|
|
res := CompareBenchmark(>Data, hazards, mitigations)
|
|
|
|
local := riskAgg{}
|
|
for _, mp := range res.MatchedPairs {
|
|
rp, ok := byName[normalizeDE(mp.EngineHazard.Name)]
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
local.noParam++
|
|
overall.noParam++
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
gtR := mp.GTEntry.RiskIn
|
|
local.matched++
|
|
overall.matched++
|
|
if rp.s > 0 && gtR.S > 0 {
|
|
local.sev.add(rp.s, gtR.S)
|
|
overall.sev.add(rp.s, gtR.S)
|
|
}
|
|
if rp.f > 0 && gtR.F > 0 {
|
|
local.freq.add(rp.f, gtR.F)
|
|
overall.freq.add(rp.f, gtR.F)
|
|
}
|
|
if rp.a > 0 && gtR.P > 0 {
|
|
local.avoid.add(rp.a, gtR.P)
|
|
overall.avoid.add(rp.a, gtR.P)
|
|
}
|
|
if rp.a == 0 {
|
|
local.noAvoidDefault++
|
|
overall.noAvoidDefault++
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// NEW: data-anchored estimates for the three axes the engine got
|
|
// wrong (W missing, P missing, S systematically over-estimated).
|
|
estW := EstimateProbabilityW(rp.cats, rp.scenario)
|
|
estP := EstimateAvoidabilityP(rp.cats, rp.scenario)
|
|
estS := EstimateSeverity(rp.cats, rp.scenario, rp.s)
|
|
if gtR.W > 0 {
|
|
local.wEst.add(estW, gtR.W)
|
|
overall.wEst.add(estW, gtR.W)
|
|
}
|
|
if gtR.P > 0 {
|
|
local.pEst.add(estP, gtR.P)
|
|
overall.pEst.add(estP, gtR.P)
|
|
}
|
|
if gtR.S > 0 {
|
|
local.sevEst.add(estS, gtR.S)
|
|
overall.sevEst.add(estS, gtR.S)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Two risk proxies for RANK comparison (our own aggregates, NOT a
|
|
// norm formula): OLD = today's engine (raw severity x exposure);
|
|
// NEW = de-biased severity scaled by summed likelihood incl. W + P.
|
|
oldProxy := float64(maxInt(rp.s, 1) * maxInt(rp.f, 1) * maxInt(rp.a, 1))
|
|
newProxy := float64(maxInt(estS, 1) * (maxInt(rp.f, 1) + estW + estP))
|
|
// Fine-Kinney score (our citable backbone) for rank comparison.
|
|
fk := SuggestFineKinney(rp.cats, rp.scenario, pr.LifecyclePhases, rp.s)
|
|
local.engineRisk = append(local.engineRisk, oldProxy)
|
|
local.newEngineRisk = append(local.newEngineRisk, newProxy)
|
|
local.fkRisk = append(local.fkRisk, fk.Score)
|
|
local.gtRisk = append(local.gtRisk, float64(gtR.R))
|
|
overall.engineRisk = append(overall.engineRisk, oldProxy)
|
|
overall.newEngineRisk = append(overall.newEngineRisk, newProxy)
|
|
overall.fkRisk = append(overall.fkRisk, fk.Score)
|
|
overall.gtRisk = append(overall.gtRisk, float64(gtR.R))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
oldConc, _ := kendallConcordance(local.engineRisk, local.gtRisk)
|
|
newConc, pairs := kendallConcordance(local.newEngineRisk, local.gtRisk)
|
|
t.Logf("=== %s — Risk benchmark ===", c.name)
|
|
t.Logf(" Matched hazards w/ engine params: %d (%d pairs had no pattern param)", local.matched, local.noParam)
|
|
t.Logf(" Severity S (raw default): MAE %.2f | within±1 %.0f%% | exact %.0f%% (n=%d)", local.sev.mae(), local.sev.pct(local.sev.within1), local.sev.pct(local.sev.exact), local.sev.n)
|
|
t.Logf(" Severity S (NEW estimate): MAE %.2f | within±1 %.0f%% | exact %.0f%% (n=%d)", local.sevEst.mae(), local.sevEst.pct(local.sevEst.within1), local.sevEst.pct(local.sevEst.exact), local.sevEst.n)
|
|
t.Logf(" Frequency F: MAE %.2f | within±1 %.0f%% | exact %.0f%% (n=%d)", local.freq.mae(), local.freq.pct(local.freq.within1), local.freq.pct(local.freq.exact), local.freq.n)
|
|
t.Logf(" Probability W (NEW estimate): MAE %.2f | within±1 %.0f%% | exact %.0f%% (n=%d)", local.wEst.mae(), local.wEst.pct(local.wEst.within1), local.wEst.pct(local.wEst.exact), local.wEst.n)
|
|
t.Logf(" Avoidance P (NEW estimate): MAE %.2f | within±1 %.0f%% | exact %.0f%% (n=%d)", local.pEst.mae(), local.pEst.pct(local.pEst.within1), local.pEst.pct(local.pEst.exact), local.pEst.n)
|
|
fkConc, _ := kendallConcordance(local.fkRisk, local.gtRisk)
|
|
t.Logf(" Risk RANK concordance: OLD %.1f%% -> NEW %.1f%% | Fine-Kinney %.1f%% (over %d pairs)", oldConc*100, newConc*100, fkConc*100, pairs)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
oldConc, _ := kendallConcordance(overall.engineRisk, overall.gtRisk)
|
|
newConc, pairs := kendallConcordance(overall.newEngineRisk, overall.gtRisk)
|
|
t.Logf("\n=== Cross-GT aggregate ===")
|
|
t.Logf(" Severity S (raw default): MAE %.2f | within±1 %.0f%% | exact %.0f%% (n=%d)", overall.sev.mae(), overall.sev.pct(overall.sev.within1), overall.sev.pct(overall.sev.exact), overall.sev.n)
|
|
t.Logf(" Severity S (NEW estimate): MAE %.2f | within±1 %.0f%% | exact %.0f%% (n=%d)", overall.sevEst.mae(), overall.sevEst.pct(overall.sevEst.within1), overall.sevEst.pct(overall.sevEst.exact), overall.sevEst.n)
|
|
t.Logf(" Frequency F: MAE %.2f | within±1 %.0f%% | exact %.0f%% (n=%d)", overall.freq.mae(), overall.freq.pct(overall.freq.within1), overall.freq.pct(overall.freq.exact), overall.freq.n)
|
|
t.Logf(" Probability W (NEW): MAE %.2f | within±1 %.0f%% | exact %.0f%% (n=%d)", overall.wEst.mae(), overall.wEst.pct(overall.wEst.within1), overall.wEst.pct(overall.wEst.exact), overall.wEst.n)
|
|
t.Logf(" Avoidance P (NEW): MAE %.2f | within±1 %.0f%% | exact %.0f%% (n=%d)", overall.pEst.mae(), overall.pEst.pct(overall.pEst.within1), overall.pEst.pct(overall.pEst.exact), overall.pEst.n)
|
|
fkConc, _ := kendallConcordance(overall.fkRisk, overall.gtRisk)
|
|
t.Logf(" Risk RANK concordance: OLD %.1f%% -> NEW %.1f%% | Fine-Kinney %.1f%% (%d pairs)", oldConc*100, newConc*100, fkConc*100, pairs)
|
|
}
|