Benjamin Admin
07e392913f
Phase A1. The real knowledge production is not writing — it is TARGETED UPDATING: when 20 documents arrive, which 5 change our knowledge and which 15 are ignorable? Before the parser, Knowledge Intake classifies a new document (no content extraction) and intersects its signals with an index of the existing knowledge to emit a Knowledge Package (an impact analysis). - compliance/knowledge_intake/: build_knowledge_index(patterns, playbooks, reference_scenarios, obligation_index) + assess_document_impact(descriptor, index) -> KnowledgePackage. Deterministic, NO content extraction, NO LLM. Surfaces affected capabilities / playbooks / transition patterns / reference scenarios / (injected) obligations, whether it is a new domain, and a triage level (HIGH / LOW / NONE / NEW_DOMAIN) with a recommendation. - ADR-006: Knowledge Intake = classify + impact before extraction; full factory Intake -> Package -> Parser -> Draft -> Review -> Published; phase order A1 Intake / A2 Draft / A3 Review. - reference suite: "Knowledge Intake" section triages 3 example documents (CRA SBOM-FAQ -> high, 14C/2PB/3RTS/2Obl; environmental guidance -> new_domain; marketing blog -> ignorable). Section lives in _helpers.py to keep generate.py under the 500-LOC budget. - Honest known refinement surfaced by intake: regulation-ID normalization (CRA vs Cyber Resilience Act). 10 intake tests (60 with the adjacent modules), mypy --strict clean (16 files), check-loc 0. Product code with no app caller + ADR/reference = non-runtime -> no deploy (ADR-001). Freeze-safe. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
backend-compliance
Python/FastAPI service implementing the DSGVO compliance API: DSR, DSFA, consent, controls, risks, evidence, audit, vendor management, ISMS, change requests, document generation.
Port: 8002 (container: bp-compliance-backend)
Stack: Python 3.12, FastAPI, SQLAlchemy 2.x, Alembic, Keycloak auth.
Architecture
compliance/
├── api/ # Routers (thin, ≤30 LOC per handler)
├── services/ # Business logic
├── repositories/ # DB access
├── domain/ # Value objects, domain errors
├── schemas/ # Pydantic models, split per domain
└── db/models/ # SQLAlchemy ORM, one module per aggregate
The service follows this layered target structure but not all files are fully refactored yet. Phase 1 backlog is tracked in .claude/rules/loc-exceptions.txt (27 backend-compliance files currently excepted).
See ../AGENTS.python.md for the full convention and ../.claude/rules/architecture.md for the non-negotiable rules.
Run locally
cd backend-compliance
pip install -r requirements.txt
export COMPLIANCE_DATABASE_URL=... # Postgres (Hetzner or local)
uvicorn main:app --reload --port 8002
Tests
pytest compliance/tests/ -v
pytest --cov=compliance --cov-report=term-missing
Layout: tests/unit/, tests/integration/, tests/contracts/. Contract tests diff /openapi.json against tests/contracts/openapi.baseline.json.
Public API surface
404+ endpoints across /api/v1/*. Grouped by domain: ai, audit, consent, dsfa, dsr, gdpr, vendor, evidence, change-requests, generation, projects, company-profile, isms. Every path is a contract — see the "Public endpoints" rule in the root CLAUDE.md.
Environment
| Var | Purpose |
|---|---|
COMPLIANCE_DATABASE_URL |
Postgres DSN, sslmode=require |
KEYCLOAK_* |
Auth verification |
QDRANT_URL, QDRANT_API_KEY |
Vector search |
CORE_VALKEY_URL |
Session cache |
Don't touch
Database schema, __tablename__, column names, existing migrations under migrations/. See root CLAUDE.md rule 3.