Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Benjamin Admin f78e03bd0a docs(knowledge): Reference Transition Scenarios (RTS-001..003) + ISO9001->CRA pattern
Three ANONYMIZED reference transition scenarios (no real company names stored) = canonical
regression scenarios that test the KNOWLEDGE, not just the engine. Each pins an Expected
Outcome (expected_likely_covered + expected_delta); every commit must reproduce it (identical
or better).

- RTS-001 automotive supplier (TISAX+ISO27001) -> CRA: mature ISMS, standard CRA delta.
- RTS-002 classic machine builder (ISO9001) -> CRA: only process discipline -> MUCH larger delta
  (10 missing vs 3 covered). New TP-ISO9001-CRA-v1 pattern (different shape).
- RTS-003 networked machine builder (ISMS) -> CRA: highlights the Data Act.

Data Act is modelled as UNCERTAIN (a hypothesis), never a fixed gilt/gilt-nicht: the generator
checks the engine SURFACES the uncertainty + the deciding question (generates_usage_data) and
never wrongly ASSERTS applicability. All three RTS PASS.

Non-runtime knowledge + reference harness -> no deploy (ADR-001). Names deliberately absent.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-27 08:46:20 +02:00
Benjamin Admin 0da093c046 docs(knowledge): TKP 4-level lifecycle + 3 enrichments + ISMS->TISAX (genericity proof)
Transition KNOWLEDGE Patterns (renamed term -- curated knowledge, not an algorithm):
- 4 maturity levels: draft -> reviewed -> validated (domain expert) -> proven (field). "approved"
  dropped; target is validated. TP-ISO27001-CRA set to reviewed (L2).
- 3 enrichments per pattern: confidence_source: relationship (curated, not an LLM estimate ->
  computed-not-stored); why_asked (customer-facing: why the source does not suffice here); dropped_if
  (what makes the question unnecessary). Applied to TP-ISO27001-CRA.
- New TP-ISMS-TISAX (draft): different character -- info-security module mostly covered; delta is
  automotive-specific (prototype protection, TISAX labels, VDA ISA self-assessment, ENX assessment,
  Art. 28 data protection). Proves the architecture is GENERIC, not CRA-tailored.
- Reference scenario 4 generalized to loop over ALL patterns through RS-005: both carried (CRA
  17->17, TISAX 13->13) -> a living genericity + regression test for every future pattern.

Non-runtime knowledge + reference harness -> no deploy (ADR-001). Next: ISO9001->IATF16949.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-27 08:29:30 +02:00
Benjamin Admin 4bfd552da7 docs(knowledge): TP-ISO27001->CRA gold standard + reference scenario (RS-005 regression)
(1) Harden the first Transition Pattern to the gold-standard template per quality checklist:
versioned transition_goal (ISO27001:2022 -> CRA, applies 2027-12-11), source_state_variants
(certified/isms_introduced/expired/limited_scope), each likely_covered assumption with a typed
relationship (supports|partially_supports, never equivalent) + verification + rationale (the Warum)
+ an auditor-checkable reviewable_claim, delta as missing-capability + needed-info, an explicit
rejected_assumptions section, and a determinism_goal. README schema updated to match.

(2) New Reference-Suite scenario 4 (Transition): the generator READS the pattern YAML and runs it
through the RS-005 Planning Engine + Company 2A -> coverage + question requests. Proves the
architecture fully carries the pattern (17 caps -> 17 coverage + 17 requests; 9 HIGH delta = the
real CRA gaps, 8 probably-covered from the ISMS). Now a living regression test: every future pattern
runs through the same engine.

Non-runtime knowledge + reference harness -> no deploy (ADR-001). Next: ISMS->TISAX once approved.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-27 08:11:42 +02:00
Benjamin Admin bea8559f78 docs(knowledge): first Transition Pattern ISO27001 -> CRA (curated knowledge base)
Reasoning session's new Knowledge Acquisition responsibility (re-charter): build and curate
the Transition Knowledge Base under backend-compliance/knowledge/transition_patterns/ (beside
reasoning/, not under it -- it is knowledge, not an engine).

First professional pattern TP-ISO27001-CRA-v1 (status: draft): separates what a mature ISMS
likely covers at the ORG level (probably_covered, needs product-level confirmation, never
auto-"erfuellt") from the CRA-specific delta with no ISO 27001 analogue (SBOM, support period +
secure signed updates, coordinated vulnerability disclosure, Art. 14 authority reporting,
product cyber risk assessment, CE conformity / technical documentation). Expert draft, not a
normative proof; review_required before customer use.

Non-runtime knowledge -> no deploy (ADR-001). Next: ISMS->TISAX.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-27 07:50:42 +02:00