Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Benjamin Admin 2341bda621 feat(ucca): adopt NIST obligation_ids (Registry Handoff #4, 10/10)
Registry filled proposed_obligation_id for the 3 NIST primary_implementation
controls: SI-7->signed_update_integrity, SI-2->provide_security_updates,
CM-7->remote_access_attack_surface_min. Adopted onto cra_nist.jsonl so the join
is now EXACT (obligation_id) instead of the coarse citation_unit fallback.
obligation-status now surfaces SI-2 under provide_security_updates; test extended.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-25 19:37:14 +02:00
Benjamin Admin 63d65af41b feat(ucca): persist 3 CRA->NIST mappings (primary_implementation) + evidence
CRA Annex I Part I (2)(e)/(2)(l)/(2)(i) had no clean OWASP target (rejected:
"Mapping ueber NIST/BSI erforderlich"). Their NIST home, curated + accepted:
  (2)(e) Integritaet     -> SI-7 (Software/Firmware/Information Integrity)
  (2)(l) Sichere Updates -> SI-2 (Flaw Remediation)
  (2)(i) Angriffsflaeche -> CM-7 (Least Functionality)

New mapping_type=primary_implementation = the single canonical control per
obligation (stronger than implements/supports); related controls (SC-3(3),
RA-5, AC-6, SI-16, ...) follow later as supports.

Evidence is framework-AGNOSTIC: SI-7/SI-2/CM-7 reuse the shared evidence_type
catalog (config_export/test_report/repo_scan) - same types carry CRA, NIST,
ISO 27001, IEC 62443, BSI. (framework,control) is only the link, not the type.

obligation_id left empty: the Obligation Registry assigns it (exported via
controls_for_obligation_mapping.json), then we adopt. go test ./internal/ucca green.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-25 18:52:35 +02:00
Benjamin Admin 2301fb2122 feat(ucca): adopt obligation_id + harden join to semantic (step 3 core)
The Obligation Registry filled proposed_obligation_id (7/7) + cut the logging
family (obligations 47->66). Adopted obligation_id onto our 7 accepted CRA->OWASP
mappings; the join now prefers the EXACT obligation_id over the coarse
citation_unit (which stays as fallback for not-yet-adopted rows).

Effect: semantic coverage 2->4 (user_authentication_required,
credential_confidentiality_protection, auth_key_management,
event_logging_security_events). Befund 1 resolved: V11.2.1 crypto now sits under
credential_confidentiality_protection, not user_authentication_required.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-25 12:18:34 +02:00
Benjamin Admin 0db0e9a129 feat(ucca): curate CRA Annex I -> OWASP mappings (review B)
7 accepted, 13 rejected (reviewed_by=benjamin, 2026-06-25). The accepted set is
the first audited ground truth of the compliance graph:
  (2c) Zugriff   -> V6.3.1, V6.1.1   (Auth)
  (2d) Crypto    -> V11.2.1, V11.7.1 (corrected from the retriever's wrong V14)
  (2k) Logging   -> V16.3.3, V16.3.4, V16.1.1

Rejected stay as audit trail. (2e) integrity, (2l) updates, (2i) attack surface
rejected with reason "OWASP ASVS not the right target standard, map via NIST/BSI"
— architectural proof for the multi-framework framework_* layer.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-25 10:01:06 +02:00
Benjamin Admin 53ea388ea0 refactor(ucca): control-mapping model per review feedback
- DROP confidence from the persisted mapping: a curated mapping is a
  professional statement, not an AI guess (retriever score -> rationale only).
- ADD mapping_status (candidate|accepted|rejected|superseded) — the review state.
- ADD audit trail (reviewed_by/review_date/review_reason); accepted/rejected
  fail-closed without it.
- EXTEND mapping_type: + implements, + contradicts.
- Advisor truth = mapping_status=accepted (acceptedOnly filter).
- migrate the 18 CRA->OWASP rows to mapping_status=candidate.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-25 09:50:37 +02:00
Benjamin Admin 2f3c98fbe0 feat(ucca): first CRA Annex I -> OWASP retriever candidates (step 3)
18 retriever_candidate mappings generated via the sdk-dev control-intent
retriever. All marked retriever_candidate (NOT curated truth) — the review
step turns the good ones into human_curated.

Empirical validation of the A-decision: the retriever proposes, but produces
wrong candidates (e.g. encryption -> V14 Config instead of V11 Crypto;
V14.2.4 over-appears) that only human review catches. Review notes inline.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-25 09:36:53 +02:00
Benjamin Admin d987e4fde6 feat(ucca): persisted Control-Mapping data model (Obligation -> framework control)
Versioned JSONL store + Go model for Regulation->Control mappings, per the
A-decision: the retriever only PROPOSES candidates; the curated mapping is the
audited truth the Advisor uses at runtime, never re-invented per query.

- ControlMapping struct (source_norm/source_role/target_framework/target_control/
  mapping_type/confidence/provenance/rationale/version)
- enum validation (rule layer), fail-closed loader, forward+reverse index,
  curated-only filter (IsCurated)
- seed: 2 retriever_candidate rows CRA Annex I -> OWASP ASVS (not yet curated)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-25 09:32:15 +02:00