Readiness check: legally tighter + sales-sharper copy per review — names both
regulations cleanly (CRA + Machinery Reg 2023/1230 in plain language), frames CRA
Art. 13 as "more than a yearly pentest: assess/document/handle cyber risk across
the lifecycle" (not over-claiming a "continuously documented risk assessment"),
adds the "we turn regulation into code" positioning, and reorders the 8 questions
in CRA order (machine -> connectivity -> software -> updates -> remote -> app ->
personal data -> critical env).
Track B: the Compliance Agent Pre-Scan wizard now detects the shared
CompanyProfile and offers "Aus Profil übernehmen" — tolerant mapping (legal_form,
industry, employee_count) across the differing module vocabularies, user-
triggered (never silent), so company context isn't re-asked.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Machine/plant builders are hit by BOTH the CRA and the new Machinery Regulation.
New machinery_reg_cyber.py models its two well-corroborated Annex III cyber-with-
safety essential requirements (1.1.9 protection against corruption, 1.2.1 control-
system safety incl. foreseeable manipulation) in our own words; EU legal text is
freely reusable (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU, source acknowledged), harmonised
standards referenced by identifier only. The readiness check asks "is it
machinery?" and, if so, adds these obligations tagged "Maschinen-VO" alongside the
CRA ones — the combination is visible (regulations list + per-item source badge).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Intro now states machine/plant builders are hit by BOTH the CRA (manufacturer
duties from 2027) and the new Machinery Regulation 2023/1230 (cyber-affecting-
safety in CE), and frames CRA Art. 13 as a continuously documented risk
assessment over the lifecycle — not a yearly pentest — which we run as a living
system (versioned snapshots). Educates the lead to win them.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Benjamin Admin