Every hint now reads like a mini-consultation from a data protection
lawyer — with specific legal references, court rulings, and common
mistakes. Examples:
- EuGH C-210/16 (Fanpage), C-298/17 (Kontaktpflicht), C-311/18 (Schrems II)
- BGH I ZR 228/03 (ladungsfaehige Anschrift), XI ZR 388/10 (AGB)
- EDSA Guidelines 2/2019 (lit. b misuse), WP 248 Rev.01 (DSFA)
- DSK-Orientierungshilfe, CNIL-Leitlinien, SDM, BSI-IT-Grundschutz
- §25 TDDDG, §38 BDSG, §309 BGB, §312k BGB, Art. 246a EGBGB
This is the core value proposition: no lawyer can deliver this level
of specific, actionable compliance feedback in 60 seconds.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Each check now has a "hint" field explaining what is missing and
what the customer should do to fix it. Hints are shown in the
frontend below failed checks in red text.
Examples:
- "Bei Verarbeitung auf Basis von Art. 6(1)(f) muss dokumentiert
werden, warum Ihr berechtigtes Interesse die Rechte der
Betroffenen ueberwiegt."
- "Die ladungsfaehige Anschrift fehlt. Erforderlich: Strasse,
Hausnummer, PLZ und Ort."
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Patterns ran on text.lower() but searched [A-Z] — changed to [a-z].
Also accept D-12345 prefix (common German format).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Benjamin Admin