All 6 security use_cases are atom-grain now. Per finding we draw two lanes: the
CRA corpus (use_case=cra, the most on-point CRA obligations) + the technical
depth (code_security for secure-dev, else network_security). Controls merged,
deduped, each tagged with its use_case (shown in the best-practice depth).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Both network_security and code_security are now atom-grain. Per-sub_topic
use_case routing: secure_development -> code_security (best for secure-dev
findings), everything else -> network_security. Findings carry breadth_use_case
so the source context (which atom corpus) is visible under the best-practice depth.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Semantic breadth (2): each finding's CRA-AI is mapped to a network_security
sub_topic and enriched with atom-grain, framework-traceable obligations from the
shared Controls-API (compliance.atom_classification) — at the endpoint/view layer
(SessionLocal), NOT in the pure mapper. CRA-AI anchor + curated measure +
NIST/OWASP crosswalk stay the lead; this is breadth + source evidence. Only
network_security is queried (atom-grain), scoped by sub_topic + limit. Frontend
renders it under the collapsible best-practice depth (control_id · title · source).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Snapshot/history: "Snapshot speichern" + a version list (status, date, coverage)
you can click through — makes the CRA Art. 13 running system visible (backend
endpoints already live). Measure-class: each finding shows a remediation-class
badge from its CRA evidence_type ("Code-nah" = scan-locatable, code-fix in the
ticket possible; otherwise Prozess/Doku), and the measures section is relabelled
as the Sollzustand (process/build) — no auto-fix buttons on process measures.
Backend: MappedFinding now carries evidence_type.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Deterministic bridge (cra_safety_bridge.py): a cyber finding's attack capability
(remote_actuation / code_tampering / integrity_loss / auth_bypass, derived from
its CRA category) is matched against what each CE safety function is vulnerable
to. A match re-opens the mitigated hazard, flags the finding safety_impact (which
floors it to P0), and produces the cross-link. Endpoint accepts safety_functions;
frontend passes the project's safety functions and renders the LIVE cross-links
(no more hardcode). Safety functions are demo input now; come from the CE risk
assessment in production.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
CRA tab now shows the priority layer: a weights control (5 business objectives,
high/medium/low) that re-computes the assessment live; a Prio column with
P0..P3 tier badges (P0 = non-negotiable floor, reason on hover); the table in
backend priority order; and a Quick-Wins block (high impact, low effort). Demo
flags the safety-cross-linked findings as safety_impact so the P0 floor shows.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
CRA tab now computes the assessment live: useCRA POSTs the scenario findings
through a new /api/v1/cra/* proxy to the backend mapper and merges the live
mapping (CRA requirement, risk, measures, NIST/OWASP crosswalk) with the
frontend scenario constants (full measure texts + cyber->safety cross-links,
until those move server-side in step 2). Falls back to the static scenario if
the backend is unreachable.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Crosswalk (cra_security_crosswalk.py): deterministic, hand-curated CRA Annex I ->
NIST 800-53 Rev5 + OWASP Top 10:2021 mapping, the authoritative Security Golden
Set (no RAG; semantic breadth comes later via the shared Controls-API). Mapper
attaches NIST/OWASP refs per finding; golden-set completeness pinned by test
(every requirement has >=1 NIST ref). CRA tab now shows the NIST/OWASP best-
practice refs per finding and the full curated measure texts + norm references
(from measures_library_cra.go).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
New "CRA / Cyber" tab in the IACE project (Zusatzmodule). Treats the
Kistenhubgeraet CE project as if it had an IoT module; invented cyber findings
are mapped to CRA Annex I requirements via the REAL backend mapper output
(faithful), and crucially cross-linked to the existing CE safety hazards they
re-open (cyber defeats a mechanically-mitigated guard -> CRA x Machinery Reg).
Frontend fixture for now; live wiring to the mapper endpoint follows.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Benjamin Admin