Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sharang Parnerkar
4fa0dd6f6d refactor(backend/api): extract VVTService (Step 4 — file 5 of 18)
compliance/api/vvt_routes.py (550 LOC) -> 225 LOC thin routes + 475-line
VVTService. Covers the organization header, processing activities CRUD,
audit log, JSON/CSV export, stats, and version lookups for the Art. 30
DSGVO Verzeichnis.

Single-service split: organization + activities + audit + stats all
revolve around the same tenant's VVT document, and the existing test
suite (tests/test_vvt_routes.py — 768 LOC, tests/test_vvt_tenant_isolation.py
— 205 LOC) exercises them together.

Module-level helpers (_activity_to_response, _log_audit, _export_csv)
stay module-level in compliance.services.vvt_service and are re-exported
from compliance.api.vvt_routes so the two test files keep importing
from the old path.

Pydantic schemas already live in compliance.schemas.vvt from Step 3 —
no new schema file needed this round.

mypy.ini flips compliance.api.vvt_routes from ignore_errors=True to
False. Two SQLAlchemy Column[str] vs str dict-index errors fixed with
explicit str() casts on status/business_function in the stats loop.

Verified:
  - 242/242 pytest (173 core + 69 VVT integration) pass
  - OpenAPI 360/484 unchanged
  - mypy compliance/ -> Success on 128 source files
  - vvt_routes.py 550 -> 225 LOC
  - vvt_service.py 475 LOC (under 500 hard cap)
  - Hard-cap violations: 14 -> 13

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-07 19:50:40 +02:00
Sharang Parnerkar
f39c7ca40c refactor(backend/api): extract CompanyProfileService (Step 4 — file 4 of 18)
compliance/api/company_profile_routes.py (640 LOC) -> 154 LOC thin routes.
Unusual for this repo: persistence uses raw SQL via sqlalchemy.text()
because the underlying compliance_company_profiles table has ~45 columns
with complex jsonb coercion and there is no SQLAlchemy model for it.

New files:
  compliance/schemas/company_profile.py         (127) — 4 request/response models
  compliance/services/company_profile_service.py (340) — Service class + row_to_response + log_audit
  compliance/services/_company_profile_sql.py   (139) — 70-line INSERT/UPDATE statements
                                                         separated for readability

Minor behavioral improvement: the handlers now use Depends(get_db) for
session management instead of the bespoke `db = SessionLocal(); try: ...
finally: db.close()` pattern. This makes the routes consistent with
every other refactored service, fixes the broken-ness under test
dependency_overrides, and removes 6 duplicate try/finally blocks.

Legacy exports preserved: CompanyProfileRequest, CompanyProfileResponse,
AuditEntryResponse, AuditListResponse, row_to_response, and log_audit are
re-exported from compliance.api.company_profile_routes so that the two
existing test files
(tests/test_company_profile_routes.py, tests/test_company_profile_extend.py)
keep importing from the same path.

Pre-existing broken tests noted: 6 tests in those files feed a 40-tuple
row into row_to_response, but _BASE_COLUMNS_LIST has 46 columns (has had
since the Phase 2 Stammdaten extension). These tests fail on main too
(verified via `git stash` round-trip). Not fixed in this commit — they
require a rewrite of the test's _make_row helper, which is out of scope
for a pure structural refactor. Flagged for follow-up.

Verified:
  - 173/173 pytest compliance/tests/ tests/contracts/ pass
  - OpenAPI 360/484 unchanged
  - mypy compliance/ -> Success on 127 source files
  - company_profile_routes.py 640 -> 154 LOC
  - All new files under soft 300 target except service (340, under hard 500)
  - Hard-cap violations: 15 -> 14

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-07 19:47:29 +02:00
Sharang Parnerkar
d571412657 refactor(backend/api): extract TOMService (Step 4 — file 3 of 18)
compliance/api/tom_routes.py (609 LOC) -> 215 LOC thin routes +
434-line TOMService. Request bodies (TOMStateBody, TOMMeasureCreate,
TOMMeasureUpdate, TOMMeasureBulkItem, TOMMeasureBulkBody) moved to
compliance/schemas/tom.py (joining the existing response models from
the Step 3 split).

Single-service split (not two like banner): state, measures CRUD + bulk
upsert, stats, export, and version lookups are all tightly coupled
around the TOMMeasureDB aggregate, so splitting would create artificial
boundaries. TOMService is 434 LOC — comfortably under the 500 hard cap.

Domain error mapping:
  - ConflictError   -> 409 (version conflict on state save; duplicate control_id on create)
  - NotFoundError   -> 404 (missing measure on update; missing version)
  - ValidationError -> 400 (missing tenant_id on DELETE /state)

Legacy test compat: the existing tests/test_tom_routes.py imports
TOMMeasureBulkItem, _parse_dt, _measure_to_dict, and DEFAULT_TENANT_ID
directly from compliance.api.tom_routes. All re-exported via __all__ so
the 44-test file runs unchanged.

mypy.ini flips compliance.api.tom_routes from ignore_errors=True to
False. TOMService carries the scoped Column[T] header.

Verified:
  - 217/217 pytest (173 baseline + 44 TOM) pass
  - OpenAPI 360/484 unchanged
  - mypy compliance/ -> Success on 124 source files
  - tom_routes.py 609 -> 215 LOC
  - Hard-cap violations: 16 -> 15

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-07 19:42:17 +02:00
Sharang Parnerkar
10073f3ef0 refactor(backend/api): extract BannerConsent + BannerAdmin services (Step 4)
Phase 1 Step 4, file 2 of 18. Same cookbook as audit_routes (4a91814 +
883ef70) applied to banner_routes.py.

compliance/api/banner_routes.py (653 LOC) is decomposed into:

  compliance/api/banner_routes.py                (255) — thin handlers
  compliance/services/banner_consent_service.py  (298) — public SDK surface
  compliance/services/banner_admin_service.py    (238) — site/category/vendor CRUD
  compliance/services/_banner_serializers.py     ( 81) — ORM-to-dict helpers
                                                         shared between the
                                                         two services
  compliance/schemas/banner.py                   ( 85) — Pydantic request models

Split rationale: the SDK-facing endpoints (consent CRUD, config
retrieval, export, stats) and the admin CRUD endpoints (sites +
categories + vendors) have distinct audiences and different auth stories,
and combined they would push the service file over the 500 hard cap.
Two focused services is cleaner than one ~540-line god class.

The shared ORM-to-dict helpers live in a private sibling module
(_banner_serializers) rather than a static method on either service, so
both services can import without a cycle.

Handlers follow the established pattern:
  - Depends(get_consent_service) or Depends(get_admin_service)
  - `with translate_domain_errors():` wrapping the service call
  - Explicit return type annotations
  - ~3-5 lines per handler

Services raise NotFoundError / ConflictError / ValidationError from
compliance.domain; no HTTPException in the service layer.

mypy.ini flips compliance.api.banner_routes from ignore_errors=True to
False, joining audit_routes in the strict scope. The services carry the
same scoped `# mypy: disable-error-code="arg-type,assignment"` header
used by the audit services for the ORM Column[T] issue.

Pydantic schemas moved to compliance.schemas.banner (mirroring the Step 3
schemas split). They were previously defined inline in banner_routes.py
and not referenced by anything outside it, so no backwards-compat shim
is needed.

Verified:
  - 224/224 pytest (173 baseline + 26 audit integration + 25 banner
    integration) pass
  - tests/contracts/test_openapi_baseline.py green (360/484 unchanged)
  - mypy compliance/ -> Success: no issues found in 123 source files
  - All new files under the 300 soft target (largest: 298)
  - banner_routes.py drops from 653 -> 255 LOC (below hard cap)

Hard-cap violations remaining: 16 (was 17).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-07 18:52:31 +02:00
Sharang Parnerkar
4a91814bfc refactor(backend/api): extract AuditSession service layer (Step 4 worked example)
Phase 1 Step 4 of PHASE1_RUNBOOK.md, first worked example. Demonstrates
the router -> service delegation pattern for all 18 oversized route
files still above the 500 LOC hard cap.

compliance/api/audit_routes.py (637 LOC) is decomposed into:

  compliance/api/audit_routes.py              (198) — thin handlers
  compliance/services/audit_session_service.py (259) — session lifecycle
  compliance/services/audit_signoff_service.py (319) — checklist + sign-off
  compliance/api/_http_errors.py               ( 43) — reusable error translator

Handlers shrink to 3-6 lines each:

    @router.post("/sessions", response_model=AuditSessionResponse)
    async def create_audit_session(
        request: CreateAuditSessionRequest,
        service: AuditSessionService = Depends(get_audit_session_service),
    ):
        with translate_domain_errors():
            return service.create(request)

Services are HTTP-agnostic: they raise NotFoundError / ConflictError /
ValidationError from compliance.domain, and the route layer translates
those to HTTPException(404/409/400) via the translate_domain_errors()
context manager in compliance.api._http_errors. The error translator is
reusable by every future Step 4 refactor.

Services take a sqlalchemy Session in the constructor and are wired via
Depends factories (get_audit_session_service / get_audit_signoff_service).
No globals, no module-level state.

Behavior is byte-identical at the HTTP boundary:
  - Same paths, methods, status codes, response models
  - Same error messages (domain error __str__ preserved)
  - Same auto-start-on-first-signoff, same statistics calculation,
    same signature hash format, same PDF streaming response

Verified:
  - 173/173 pytest compliance/tests/ tests/contracts/ pass
  - OpenAPI 360 paths / 484 operations unchanged
  - audit_routes.py under soft 300 target
  - Both new service files under soft 300 / hard 500

Note: compliance/tests/test_audit_routes.py contains placeholder tests
that do not actually import or call the handler functions — they only
assert on request-data shape. Real behavioral coverage relies on the
contract test. A follow-up commit should add TestClient-based
integration tests for the audit endpoints. Flagged in PHASE1_RUNBOOK.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-07 18:16:50 +02:00
Sharang Parnerkar
3320ef94fc refactor: phase 0 guardrails + phase 1 step 2 (models.py split)
Squash of branch refactor/phase0-guardrails-and-models-split — 4 commits,
81 files, 173/173 pytest green, OpenAPI contract preserved (360 paths /
484 operations).

## Phase 0 — Architecture guardrails

Three defense-in-depth layers to keep the architecture rules enforced
regardless of who opens Claude Code in this repo:

  1. .claude/settings.json PreToolUse hook on Write/Edit blocks any file
     that would exceed the 500-line hard cap. Auto-loads in every Claude
     session in this repo.
  2. scripts/githooks/pre-commit (install via scripts/install-hooks.sh)
     enforces the LOC cap locally, freezes migrations/ without
     [migration-approved], and protects guardrail files without
     [guardrail-change].
  3. .gitea/workflows/ci.yaml gains loc-budget + guardrail-integrity +
     sbom-scan (syft+grype) jobs, adds mypy --strict for the new Python
     packages (compliance/{services,repositories,domain,schemas}), and
     tsc --noEmit for admin-compliance + developer-portal.

Per-language conventions documented in AGENTS.python.md, AGENTS.go.md,
AGENTS.typescript.md at the repo root — layering, tooling, and explicit
"what you may NOT do" lists. Root CLAUDE.md is prepended with the six
non-negotiable rules. Each of the 10 services gets a README.md.

scripts/check-loc.sh enforces soft 300 / hard 500 and surfaces the
current baseline of 205 hard + 161 soft violations so Phases 1-4 can
drain it incrementally. CI gates only CHANGED files in PRs so the
legacy baseline does not block unrelated work.

## Deprecation sweep

47 files. Pydantic V1 regex= -> pattern= (2 sites), class Config ->
ConfigDict in source_policy_router.py (schemas.py intentionally skipped;
it is the Phase 1 Step 3 split target). datetime.utcnow() ->
datetime.now(timezone.utc) everywhere including SQLAlchemy default=
callables. All DB columns already declare timezone=True, so this is a
latent-bug fix at the Python side, not a schema change.

DeprecationWarning count dropped from 158 to 35.

## Phase 1 Step 1 — Contract test harness

tests/contracts/test_openapi_baseline.py diffs the live FastAPI /openapi.json
against tests/contracts/openapi.baseline.json on every test run. Fails on
removed paths, removed status codes, or new required request body fields.
Regenerate only via tests/contracts/regenerate_baseline.py after a
consumer-updated contract change. This is the safety harness for all
subsequent refactor commits.

## Phase 1 Step 2 — models.py split (1466 -> 85 LOC shim)

compliance/db/models.py is decomposed into seven sibling aggregate modules
following the existing repo pattern (dsr_models.py, vvt_models.py, ...):

  regulation_models.py       (134) — Regulation, Requirement
  control_models.py          (279) — Control, Mapping, Evidence, Risk
  ai_system_models.py        (141) — AISystem, AuditExport
  service_module_models.py   (176) — ServiceModule, ModuleRegulation, ModuleRisk
  audit_session_models.py    (177) — AuditSession, AuditSignOff
  isms_governance_models.py  (323) — ISMSScope, Context, Policy, Objective, SoA
  isms_audit_models.py       (468) — Finding, CAPA, MgmtReview, InternalAudit,
                                     AuditTrail, Readiness

models.py becomes an 85-line re-export shim in dependency order so
existing imports continue to work unchanged. Schema is byte-identical:
__tablename__, column definitions, relationship strings, back_populates,
cascade directives all preserved.

All new sibling files are under the 500-line hard cap; largest is
isms_audit_models.py at 468. No file in compliance/db/ now exceeds
the hard cap.

## Phase 1 Step 3 — infrastructure only

backend-compliance/compliance/{schemas,domain,repositories}/ packages
are created as landing zones with docstrings. compliance/domain/
exports DomainError / NotFoundError / ConflictError / ValidationError /
PermissionError — the base classes services will use to raise
domain-level errors instead of HTTPException.

PHASE1_RUNBOOK.md at backend-compliance/PHASE1_RUNBOOK.md documents
the nine-step execution plan for Phase 1: snapshot baseline,
characterization tests, split models.py (this commit), split schemas.py
(next), extract services, extract repositories, mypy --strict, coverage.

## Verification

  backend-compliance/.venv-phase1: uv python install 3.12 + pip -r requirements.txt
  PYTHONPATH=. pytest compliance/tests/ tests/contracts/
  -> 173 passed, 0 failed, 35 warnings, OpenAPI 360/484 unchanged

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-07 13:18:29 +02:00