1d65d99d5fd45c29e2d2089d69211fb61fea8b29
3 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1e5aaf7103 |
feat(advisor): Authority Router — Advisor collection-agnostisch, KB-2026.1-Gewinn im Produktpfad
CI / detect-changes (pull_request) Successful in 13s
CI / branch-name (pull_request) Successful in 2s
CI / guardrail-integrity (pull_request) Successful in 5s
CI / secret-scan (pull_request) Successful in 11s
CI / dep-audit (pull_request) Failing after 54s
CI / sbom-scan (pull_request) Failing after 1m1s
CI / build-sha-integrity (pull_request) Successful in 11s
CI / validate-canonical-controls (pull_request) Successful in 7s
CI / loc-budget (pull_request) Successful in 23s
CI / go-lint (pull_request) Successful in 53s
CI / python-lint (pull_request) Failing after 17s
CI / nodejs-lint (pull_request) Failing after 1m6s
CI / nodejs-build (pull_request) Successful in 2m59s
CI / test-go (pull_request) Successful in 1m0s
CI / iace-gt-coverage (pull_request) Successful in 17s
CI / test-python-backend (pull_request) Successful in 26s
CI / test-python-document-crawler (pull_request) Successful in 12s
CI / test-python-dsms-gateway (pull_request) Successful in 8s
Der Advisor fan-outete bisher selbst ueber eine feste Liste expliziter Collections
(advisor-rag.ts) und umging damit das #61-Scope-Routing (das nur den Default-Pfad
routet) → der gemessene +28-Retrieval-Gewinn (CB-100: 53→81, 0 Regr) kam nie beim
Antwort-LLM an. Dieser Router zieht den Fan-out in die Retriever-Schicht:
- SDK: LegalRAGClient.Retrieve() + POST /sdk/v1/rag/retrieve {query, top_k} —
fan-outet server-seitig ueber die Broad-Authority-Base + die KB-2026.1-Slice bei
inKBScope, merge+dedup, sortiert nach Authority-Score (rerankByAuthority je
Collection), top-K. Index-Warmup vor dem nebenlaeufigen Fan-out (Map-Race-frei).
Per-Env via RAG_ROUTER_COLLECTIONS.
- admin: advisor-rag.ts ruft EINMAL /retrieve statt 6-fach expliziter Collections.
Advisor ist collection-agnostisch (Vertrag Compiler→Collections→Retriever→Advisor);
COMPLIANCE_COLLECTIONS/searchCollection entfernt.
Validierung: Go-Unit (Router-Selektion, dedup); e2e gegen dev-Qdrant (echter
Retrieve(), CB-100-Stichprobe stride 5): OLD-hit 11/20 → NEW-hit 15/20, GAIN 4
(alle DS-Guidance), REGR 0 — reproduziert den +28/0-Regr durch den Produktionscode.
TS-Tests auf den Single-/retrieve-Call angepasst.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
|
017c9b3c12 |
feat(advisor): Legal-RAG Zitier-Metadaten — ai-sdk + Advisor/Drafting lesen article_label
ai-sdk (legal_rag_client/scroll/types) liest die gepinnten Spec-Felder
article_label/regulation_code/article/paragraph/sub/citation_style/is_recital
mit Fallback auf alt-ingestierte Chunks (regulation_id, section); neuer getBool-Helfer.
Advisor + Drafting-Engine bilden die Quellenzeile primaer aus article_label
("BDSG § 38 Abs. 1"), sonst aus den strukturierten Feldern. 17 Tests gruen, tsc sauber.
Vertrag: docs-src/development/rag_reingest_spec.md (§2/§7). Deploy an den Re-Ingest
gekoppelt — neue Felder sind bis dahin leer (graceful Fallback).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
|
cd3e0b15ad |
fix(advisor): Compliance-Advisor auf prod reparieren — RAG via ai-sdk (bge-m3) + OVH-LLM
CI / detect-changes (push) Successful in 6s
CI / branch-name (push) Has been skipped
CI / secret-scan (push) Has been skipped
CI / dep-audit (push) Has been skipped
CI / sbom-scan (push) Has been skipped
CI / guardrail-integrity (push) Has been skipped
CI / build-sha-integrity (push) Successful in 7s
CI / validate-canonical-controls (push) Successful in 6s
CI / loc-budget (push) Successful in 19s
CI / go-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / python-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / nodejs-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / nodejs-build (push) Successful in 3m4s
CI / test-go (push) Successful in 58s
CI / iace-gt-coverage (push) Successful in 16s
CI / test-python-backend (push) Has been skipped
CI / test-python-document-crawler (push) Has been skipped
CI / test-python-dsms-gateway (push) Has been skipped
Der Floating-Compliance-Advisor war auf prod kaputt (502): RAG ging ueber rag-service:8097 (auf prod nicht vorhanden) und der Chat ueber OLLAMA_URL=ollama-embed (embedding-only, kein qwen2.5vl). - RAG laeuft jetzt ueber die ai-compliance-sdk /sdk/v1/rag/search (bge-m3, prod-erreichbar) statt rag-service -> profitiert vom reicheren Embedding. (lib/sdk/agents/advisor-rag.ts) - LLM-Kaskade: OVH/LiteLLM (gpt-oss-120b) zuerst, Ollama als Dev-Fallback. (lib/sdk/agents/advisor-llm.ts; OVH-Env via orca-infra admin-Block) - ai-sdk: bp_compliance_recht in AllowedCollections ergaenzt (Whitelist war inkonsistent — die Fehlermeldung listete es bereits als erlaubt). - Route auf die Module umgestellt (duenn); Controls-Augmentation unveraendert. - Tests: advisor-rag + advisor-llm. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com> |