feat: Phase 3 — RAG-Anbindung fuer alle 18 Dokumenttypen + Vendor Contract Review
All checks were successful
CI / go-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / python-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / nodejs-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / test-go-ai-compliance (push) Successful in 34s
CI / test-python-backend-compliance (push) Successful in 26s
CI / test-python-document-crawler (push) Successful in 21s
CI / test-python-dsms-gateway (push) Successful in 17s
All checks were successful
CI / go-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / python-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / nodejs-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / test-go-ai-compliance (push) Successful in 34s
CI / test-python-backend-compliance (push) Successful in 26s
CI / test-python-document-crawler (push) Successful in 21s
CI / test-python-dsms-gateway (push) Successful in 17s
Migrate queryRAG from klausur-service GET to bp-core-rag-service POST with multi-collection support. Each of the 18 ScopeDocumentType now gets a type-specific RAG collection and optimized search query instead of the generic fallback. Vendor-compliance contract review now uses LLM + RAG for real analysis with mock fallback on error. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Tests for RAG Config — ensures all document types have valid mappings.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest'
|
||||
import { DOCUMENT_RAG_CONFIG } from '../rag-config'
|
||||
import type { ScopeDocumentType } from '@/lib/sdk/compliance-scope-types'
|
||||
|
||||
// All 18 ScopeDocumentType values
|
||||
const ALL_DOCUMENT_TYPES: ScopeDocumentType[] = [
|
||||
'vvt', 'lf', 'tom', 'av_vertrag', 'dsi', 'betroffenenrechte',
|
||||
'dsfa', 'daten_transfer', 'datenpannen', 'einwilligung',
|
||||
'vertragsmanagement', 'schulung', 'audit_log', 'risikoanalyse',
|
||||
'notfallplan', 'zertifizierung', 'datenschutzmanagement', 'iace_ce_assessment',
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
// Known RAG collections in bp-core-rag-service
|
||||
const VALID_COLLECTIONS = [
|
||||
'bp_dsfa_corpus',
|
||||
'bp_compliance_datenschutz',
|
||||
'bp_compliance_gesetze',
|
||||
'bp_compliance_recht',
|
||||
'bp_compliance_ce',
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
describe('DOCUMENT_RAG_CONFIG', () => {
|
||||
it('should have an entry for all 18 ScopeDocumentType values', () => {
|
||||
for (const docType of ALL_DOCUMENT_TYPES) {
|
||||
expect(DOCUMENT_RAG_CONFIG[docType]).toBeDefined()
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('should have exactly 18 entries', () => {
|
||||
expect(Object.keys(DOCUMENT_RAG_CONFIG)).toHaveLength(18)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('should use valid collection names', () => {
|
||||
for (const [, config] of Object.entries(DOCUMENT_RAG_CONFIG)) {
|
||||
expect(VALID_COLLECTIONS).toContain(config.collection)
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('should have non-empty queries for all types', () => {
|
||||
for (const [, config] of Object.entries(DOCUMENT_RAG_CONFIG)) {
|
||||
expect(config.query).toBeTruthy()
|
||||
expect(config.query.length).toBeGreaterThan(5)
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('should have DSFA mapped to bp_dsfa_corpus', () => {
|
||||
expect(DOCUMENT_RAG_CONFIG.dsfa.collection).toBe('bp_dsfa_corpus')
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('should have unique queries for each document type', () => {
|
||||
const queries = Object.values(DOCUMENT_RAG_CONFIG).map(c => c.query)
|
||||
const uniqueQueries = new Set(queries)
|
||||
expect(uniqueQueries.size).toBe(queries.length)
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user