feat(programs): start the Environmental Knowledge Program — domains, not architecture
The architecture is stable; from here the value comes from DOMAINS, not more software. Phase B is organized as law-first Domain Knowledge Programs, each delivering the same production line: Corpus -> Obligations -> Capabilities -> Transition Patterns -> Playbooks -> Reference Scenarios -> Completeness. No new runtime framework (Freeze v1.0). - knowledge/programs/README.md: reusable Domain Program blueprint (production line, per-stage ownership, law-first ordering, planned programs Environmental/Automotive/IEC62443/Functional-Safety). - knowledge/programs/environmental.yaml: the Environmental domain as DATA. Law-first: B1 Environmental Regulatory Corpus (water/chemicals/emissions/energy/waste/product-responsibility — law + obligations only) -> B2 Capability Model -> B3 Transition Patterns (ISO 14001 -> corpus, built LAST). ISO 14001 is a source state, NOT the domain. - Ownership handoffs: B1 -> Legal Knowledge, B2 -> Compliance Execution, B3+/playbooks/reference -> Reasoning. Coordinate via the board; no session builds another's artifacts. - reference suite: "Domain Knowledge Programs" section renders the program stages + a measurable Completeness baseline (6 areas, 0 assessed today) that flips automatically as stages land. - ADR-008: from architecture to domains; Phase B as law-first programs; architecture frozen. 6 program-contract tests (law-first order + ownership pinned), check-loc 0. Knowledge data + ADR + reference harness = non-runtime -> no deploy (ADR-001). No new module, no runtime change. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
|
||||
# Domain Knowledge Programs — from architecture to domains
|
||||
|
||||
**The architecture is stable. From here the value comes from DOMAINS, not more software.**
|
||||
The runtime architecture (scope, regulatory map, capability delta, optimization, playbooks, intake,
|
||||
production, completeness) is frozen. A new regulatory domain is a **data + knowledge** project that
|
||||
extends every existing view automatically — no new runtime framework (see ADR-008, Freeze v1.0).
|
||||
|
||||
## The production line (reusable for EVERY domain)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Regulatory Corpus → Obligations → Capabilities → Transition Patterns → Playbooks → Reference Scenarios → Completeness
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Each domain delivers the SAME artifacts. Once they land, the existing engines automatically extend:
|
||||
Scope · Gap · Capability Delta · Optimization · Playbooks · Reference Scenarios · Regulatory Completeness.
|
||||
|
||||
## Law-first (a deliberate ordering)
|
||||
|
||||
Start from the **law**, not from a management system. A management system (e.g. ISO 14001) is NOT
|
||||
the domain — it is one possible source state. The customer asks *„welche Anforderungen gelten für mein
|
||||
Produkt?"*, not *„wie komme ich von ISO 14001 weg?"*. So the order is:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Recht → Obligations → Capabilities → (Managementsystem) → Delta
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
A management-system→corpus transition pattern is built LAST, once BOTH sides are known.
|
||||
|
||||
## Ownership per stage (coordinate via the board, do not duplicate)
|
||||
|
||||
| Stage | Artifact | Owner |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| B1 Corpus + Obligations | legal sources, obligations registry | **Legal Knowledge / Obligation Registry** |
|
||||
| B2 Capability Model | new capabilities in the Master Capability Registry | **Compliance Execution** |
|
||||
| B3 Transition Patterns | source-state → corpus delta patterns | **Reasoning (Knowledge Acquisition)** |
|
||||
| Playbooks | implementation playbooks per capability | **Reasoning** |
|
||||
| Reference Scenarios | canonical regression + expected outcomes | **Reasoning** |
|
||||
| Completeness | corpus-status registry per domain | **Reasoning / curation** |
|
||||
|
||||
## Programs (planned)
|
||||
|
||||
| Program | File | Status |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| Environmental Knowledge Program | `environmental.yaml` | started (B1 handed off) |
|
||||
| Automotive Knowledge Program | _planned_ | — |
|
||||
| OT / IEC 62443 Knowledge Program | _planned_ | — |
|
||||
| Functional Safety Knowledge Program | _planned_ | — |
|
||||
|
||||
Each program is a machine-readable definition (`*.yaml`) consumed by the reference suite to track its
|
||||
progress; future sessions flip stage `status` as artifacts land, and the Completeness engine reports
|
||||
the domain flipping `unsupported → validated` automatically.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
|
||||
# Environmental Knowledge Program — a regulatory DOMAIN, not an ISO-14001 project.
|
||||
# Machine-readable program definition consumed by the reference suite to track progress.
|
||||
# LAW-FIRST: Umweltrecht -> Obligations -> Capabilities -> ISO 14001 -> Delta (never the reverse).
|
||||
|
||||
id: PROG-environmental
|
||||
name: "Environmental Knowledge Program"
|
||||
customer_question: "Welche Umweltanforderungen gelten für mein Produkt (z. B. Industriespülmaschine)?"
|
||||
status: started # planned | started | in_progress | complete
|
||||
|
||||
principle: >
|
||||
ISO 14001 ist KEIN Umweltrecht, sondern ein Managementsystem. Wir starten beim Recht und fragen
|
||||
erst danach, welche vorhandenen Managementsysteme davon wahrscheinlich schon etwas abdecken.
|
||||
|
||||
# the reusable production line, instantiated for this domain
|
||||
blueprint: [corpus, obligations, capabilities, transition_patterns, playbooks, reference_scenarios, completeness]
|
||||
|
||||
stages:
|
||||
- id: B1
|
||||
name: "Environmental Regulatory Corpus"
|
||||
owner: "Legal Knowledge / Obligation Registry"
|
||||
status: open # handed off — not built here
|
||||
note: "Zunächst NUR Rechtsquellen + Pflichten (noch keine ISO, keine Capabilities)."
|
||||
areas: # the six environmental obligation areas the customer actually faces
|
||||
- water # Wasser / Abwasser
|
||||
- chemicals # Chemikalien (REACH/CLP)
|
||||
- emissions # Emissionen
|
||||
- energy # Energie
|
||||
- waste # Abfall
|
||||
- product_responsibility # Produktverantwortung
|
||||
|
||||
- id: B2
|
||||
name: "Environmental Capability Model"
|
||||
owner: "Compliance Execution"
|
||||
status: open # depends on B1; Registry grows here
|
||||
depends_on: [B1]
|
||||
capabilities:
|
||||
- chemical_management
|
||||
- wastewater_management
|
||||
- emissions_monitoring
|
||||
- hazardous_substance_management
|
||||
- energy_data_capture
|
||||
- environmental_incident_management
|
||||
|
||||
- id: B3
|
||||
name: "Transition Patterns (ISO 14001 -> Environmental Corpus)"
|
||||
owner: "Reasoning (Knowledge Acquisition)"
|
||||
status: blocked # LAST — only once both sides (corpus + capabilities) are known
|
||||
depends_on: [B1, B2]
|
||||
note: "Erst jetzt sinnvoll: ISO 14001 als Quellzustand gegen den Umwelt-Korpus (User: law-first)."
|
||||
|
||||
# once B1-B3 land these extend AUTOMATICALLY via the existing engines (no new runtime architecture)
|
||||
downstream_auto: [playbooks, reference_scenarios, optimization, scope, capability_delta, completeness]
|
||||
|
||||
acceptance: >
|
||||
Regulatory Completeness kippt `Environmental` von unsupported/open auf assessed; die sechs Bereiche
|
||||
sind als Obligations + Capabilities im validierten Korpus, das ISO-14001-Delta als Transition Pattern.
|
||||
Messbar an der Reference Suite (Environmental-Zelle UNSUPPORTED -> PASS).
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user