feat(iace): benchmark system + erklaerteil + dedup-fix
Build + Deploy / build-admin-compliance (push) Successful in 2m7s
Build + Deploy / build-backend-compliance (push) Successful in 3m34s
Build + Deploy / build-ai-sdk (push) Successful in 1m6s
Build + Deploy / build-developer-portal (push) Successful in 1m7s
Build + Deploy / build-tts (push) Successful in 1m58s
Build + Deploy / build-document-crawler (push) Successful in 57s
Build + Deploy / build-dsms-gateway (push) Successful in 34s
Build + Deploy / build-dsms-node (push) Successful in 29s
CI / branch-name (push) Has been skipped
CI / guardrail-integrity (push) Has been skipped
CI / loc-budget (push) Failing after 17s
CI / secret-scan (push) Has been skipped
CI / go-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / python-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / nodejs-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / nodejs-build (push) Successful in 2m28s
CI / dep-audit (push) Has been skipped
CI / sbom-scan (push) Has been skipped
CI / test-go (push) Successful in 42s
CI / test-python-backend (push) Successful in 37s
CI / test-python-document-crawler (push) Successful in 27s
CI / test-python-dsms-gateway (push) Successful in 22s
CI / validate-canonical-controls (push) Successful in 15s
Build + Deploy / trigger-orca (push) Successful in 3m10s
Build + Deploy / build-admin-compliance (push) Successful in 2m7s
Build + Deploy / build-backend-compliance (push) Successful in 3m34s
Build + Deploy / build-ai-sdk (push) Successful in 1m6s
Build + Deploy / build-developer-portal (push) Successful in 1m7s
Build + Deploy / build-tts (push) Successful in 1m58s
Build + Deploy / build-document-crawler (push) Successful in 57s
Build + Deploy / build-dsms-gateway (push) Successful in 34s
Build + Deploy / build-dsms-node (push) Successful in 29s
CI / branch-name (push) Has been skipped
CI / guardrail-integrity (push) Has been skipped
CI / loc-budget (push) Failing after 17s
CI / secret-scan (push) Has been skipped
CI / go-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / python-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / nodejs-lint (push) Has been skipped
CI / nodejs-build (push) Successful in 2m28s
CI / dep-audit (push) Has been skipped
CI / sbom-scan (push) Has been skipped
CI / test-go (push) Successful in 42s
CI / test-python-backend (push) Successful in 37s
CI / test-python-document-crawler (push) Successful in 27s
CI / test-python-dsms-gateway (push) Successful in 22s
CI / validate-canonical-controls (push) Successful in 15s
Build + Deploy / trigger-orca (push) Successful in 3m10s
- Erklaerteil-Template fuer Risikobeurteilungen (risk_assessment_template.go) in PDF-Export, Markdown-Export und Frontend ReportPrintView eingebaut - Ground Truth Benchmark-System: Datenmodell, Fuzzy-Matching-Engine, 3 API Endpoints (import-gt, benchmark, benchmark/summary) - Frontend Benchmark-Tab mit Score-Cards, Kategorie-Breakdown, Hazard-Vergleichstabelle (Zugeordnet/Fehlend/Extra), Business Impact - Erster Benchmark: 13.3% Coverage (Baseline) gegen 60 GT-Eintraege - Dedup-Fix: seenCat[cat] -> seenCatZone[cat+zone] erlaubt mehrere Gefaehrdungen pro Kategorie an verschiedenen Gefahrenstellen - Komponenten-spezifische Hazard-Namen und Zone-basierte Zuordnung Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
+52
-1
@@ -119,10 +119,61 @@ export function ReportPrintView({ data }: ReportPrintViewProps) {
|
||||
Herstellers nach EU Maschinenverordnung 2023/1230 Art. 10.
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
||||
{/* 2. Inhaltsverzeichnis */}
|
||||
{/* 2. Methodik der Risikobeurteilung (Erklaerteil) */}
|
||||
<div className="section-break">
|
||||
<h2>Methodik der Risikobeurteilung</h2>
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
Diese Risikobeurteilung orientiert sich an den Grundprinzipien der EN ISO 12100,
|
||||
EN 62061 und EN ISO 13849-1. Bewertet werden Grenzen des Produkts, identifizierte
|
||||
Gefaehrdungen, die jeweilige Risikohoehe sowie das Restrisiko nach Anwendung von
|
||||
Schutzmassnahmen.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
Der Prozess ist iterativ: Reicht eine Massnahme nicht aus, werden weitere ergriffen
|
||||
und das Restrisiko erneut bewertet, bis ein akzeptables Niveau erreicht ist.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
<h3>Risikoberechnung</h3>
|
||||
<p>Das Ausgangsrisiko ergibt sich aus: <strong>R = S × F × P × A</strong></p>
|
||||
<table>
|
||||
<thead>
|
||||
<tr><th>Faktor</th><th>Beschreibung</th><th>Skala</th></tr>
|
||||
</thead>
|
||||
<tbody>
|
||||
<tr><td><strong>S</strong></td><td>Schadensschwere</td><td>1 (Erste Hilfe) – 5 (toedlich)</td></tr>
|
||||
<tr><td><strong>F</strong></td><td>Expositionshaeufigkeit</td><td>1 (selten/kurz) – 5 (dauerhaft)</td></tr>
|
||||
<tr><td><strong>P</strong></td><td>Eintrittswahrscheinlichkeit</td><td>1 (vernachlaessigbar) – 5 (fast sicher)</td></tr>
|
||||
<tr><td><strong>A</strong></td><td>Vermeidbarkeit</td><td>1 (leicht vermeidbar) – 5 (unvermeidbar)</td></tr>
|
||||
</tbody>
|
||||
</table>
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
Bei Sicherheitskreisen wird der Performance Level (PLr) ueber einen Risikographen
|
||||
abgeleitet und dem Safety Integrity Level (SIL) zugeordnet.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
<h3>Dreistufenmethode</h3>
|
||||
<p>Schutzmassnahmen werden priorisiert angewandt:</p>
|
||||
<ol>
|
||||
<li><strong>Konstruktive Massnahmen (KM)</strong> — Inhaerent sichere Gestaltung</li>
|
||||
<li><strong>Technische Schutzmassnahmen (TM)</strong> — Schutzeinrichtungen, Sicherheitssteuerungen</li>
|
||||
<li><strong>Benutzerinformationen (BI)</strong> — Warnhinweise, Betriebsanleitung</li>
|
||||
</ol>
|
||||
<h3>Akzeptanz des Restrisikos</h3>
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
Ein Restrisiko gilt als hinreichend gemindert, wenn alle praktisch umsetzbaren Massnahmen
|
||||
ausgeschoepft wurden und Anwender ueber verbleibende Restrisiken informiert sind.
|
||||
Die Akzeptanz wird pro Gefaehrdung mit <strong>JA</strong> / <strong>NEIN</strong> dokumentiert.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
<p style={{ fontStyle: 'italic', fontSize: '9pt', color: '#374151' }}>
|
||||
„Die Moeglichkeit, einen hoeheren Sicherheitsgrad zu erreichen, oder die Verfuegbarkeit
|
||||
anderer Produkte, die ein geringeres Risiko darstellen, ist kein ausreichender Grund,
|
||||
ein Produkt als gefaehrlich anzusehen.“ — § 3 Abs. 2 ProdSG
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
||||
{/* 3. Inhaltsverzeichnis */}
|
||||
<div className="section-break">
|
||||
<h2>Inhaltsverzeichnis</h2>
|
||||
<ol className="toc">
|
||||
<li>Methodik der Risikobeurteilung</li>
|
||||
<li>Maschinenbeschreibung</li>
|
||||
<li>Angewandte Normen</li>
|
||||
<li>Gefaehrdungsliste</li>
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user