fix(ai-sdk): national-law subsidiarity in authority rerank (DSGVO > BDSG for general questions)
CI / detect-changes (pull_request) Successful in 11s
CI / branch-name (pull_request) Successful in 2s
CI / guardrail-integrity (pull_request) Successful in 9s
CI / secret-scan (pull_request) Successful in 11s
CI / dep-audit (pull_request) Failing after 54s
CI / sbom-scan (pull_request) Failing after 59s
CI / build-sha-integrity (pull_request) Successful in 8s
CI / validate-canonical-controls (pull_request) Successful in 8s
CI / loc-budget (pull_request) Successful in 23s
CI / go-lint (pull_request) Successful in 57s
CI / python-lint (pull_request) Failing after 16s
CI / nodejs-lint (pull_request) Failing after 1m11s
CI / nodejs-build (pull_request) Successful in 3m4s
CI / test-go (pull_request) Successful in 1m1s
CI / iace-gt-coverage (pull_request) Successful in 18s
CI / test-python-backend (pull_request) Successful in 25s
CI / test-python-document-crawler (pull_request) Successful in 14s
CI / test-python-dsms-gateway (pull_request) Successful in 12s

The authority reranker (wired in legal_rag_client.go:168) had no national-subsidiarity
dimension, so a general BDSG paragraph could outrank the primary DSGVO article. Surfaced by
the KB-2026.1 BDSG pilot (dp_05/08/11 + cr_07).

- authorityScore: DE binding_law in an EU-primary domain WITHOUT a co-primary topic match
  -> soft demote (subsidiarityPen 0.18), not exclusion. National special rules stay
  co-primary via the topic ontology (DSB Art.37+§38, special categories Art.9+§22, ...).
- queryDomain: fall back to a regulation-name mention (DSGVO/BDSG/CRA) so a question phrased
  around the act is domain-scoped even without a topical keyword (fixes cr_07: BDSG Teil-3 §64).
- data_protection keyword stem 'auftragsverarbeit' (catches Auftragsverarbeitungsvertrag).

Pure ranking logic, no data manipulation; soft demotes keep national rules visible.
Build result (DSGVO+BDSG): degraded=0, must_not=0. go build/vet/test ./... green; 6 new table tests.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Benjamin Admin
2026-06-26 21:28:12 +02:00
parent 8609b696c9
commit 623d80b6c8
3 changed files with 98 additions and 1 deletions
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ const (
domainMatchGain = 0.15
offDomainPenalty = 0.10 // off-domain binding (demoted, not removed)
scopePenalty = 0.25 // BDSG Teil 3 (law enforcement) on a general DP question
subsidiarityPen = 0.18 // national implementing law (BDSG) on a general EU-primary question: SOFT demote, not exclusion
topicGain = 0.18 // amplifier only
supersededPenalty = 0.50 // superseded Alt-Quelle (pre-eu-v1): demoted, nicht versteckt
intentLiftGain = 0.10 // epsilon a qualifying interpretative source is lifted ABOVE the best binding
@@ -102,6 +103,15 @@ func authorityScore(query string, r LegalSearchResult, qDomain string, qForeign
if qDomain == "data_protection" && scopeClass(r) == "law_enforcement" {
score -= scopePenalty
}
// Subsidiarity: a national implementing law (DE binding, e.g. BDSG) is subsidiary to the
// primary EU act for GENERAL questions in an EU-primary domain — UNLESS the query hits a
// topic where the national norm is co-primary (DSB §38, special categories §22, ...). The
// topic boost below lifts those; here we only SOFT-demote the non-topic national norm, so
// it stays visible and can still win on a strongly matching topic. No hard exclusion.
if euPrimaryDomains[qDomain] && info.sourceClass == "binding_law" &&
info.jurisdiction == "DE" && !resultMatchesTopic(query, r) {
score -= subsidiarityPen
}
if resultMatchesTopic(query, r) {
score += topicGain // Verstaerker, kein Override
}