feat(ai-sdk): pluggable LLM judgment over recall-safe dedup candidates (P2 slice 2)

Adds the semantic judgement layer on top of the slice-1 detector + GT wall.
DEV-TIME, propose-only — nothing mutates the library or runtime.

- CandidateJudge interface with two implementations: HeuristicJudge
  (deterministic default/fallback, used in tests) and LLMJudge (offline, over the
  shared llm.ProviderRegistry via the LLMCompleter adapter). LLMJudge degrades to
  "uncertain" on any transport/parse error — it can never break a run.
- BuildJudgePrompt: the ISO 12100 same-vs-distinct prompt, unit-tested
  deterministically even though the call is not.
- RenderProposalQueue: markdown human-review queue with a suggested action per
  candidate (supersede / keep both / needs review).

On real warewashing output the heuristic punts to "uncertain — needs the LLM
judge" for exactly the two recall-safe near-dupes (HP807/HP033 update,
HP101/HP096 winding-vs-friction), making the LLM's role explicit. All 3 GTs
unaffected (read-only). Live qwen wiring + a CLI/file queue are slice 3.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Benjamin Admin
2026-06-25 08:56:04 +02:00
parent 8674b2cd9a
commit 0ce4794767
4 changed files with 351 additions and 17 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
package iace
import (
"context"
"encoding/json"
"fmt"
"strings"
"github.com/breakpilot/ai-compliance-sdk/internal/llm"
)
// Semantic judgement over RECALL-SAFE dedup candidates (P2 slice 2). DEV-TIME,
// propose-only. The deterministic GT wall (proposer_screen.go) has already
// removed candidates that would drop recall or that credit different GT entries;
// the judge only adds an opinion on whether the survivors are truly the same
// hazard, plus a rationale, for the human review queue. It NEVER mutates anything.
//
// The judge is pluggable behind CandidateJudge so the runtime/tests stay
// deterministic (HeuristicJudge) while the dev-time CLI can plug in the
// non-deterministic LLM (LLMJudge over the shared llm.ProviderRegistry).
const (
VerdictDuplicate = "duplicate"
VerdictDistinct = "distinct"
VerdictUncertain = "uncertain"
)
// JudgedProposal is one candidate with its GT-wall result and the judge's opinion.
type JudgedProposal struct {
Candidate DedupCandidate `json:"candidate"`
Screen ScreenResult `json:"screen"`
Verdict string `json:"verdict"`
Confidence string `json:"confidence"`
Rationale string `json:"rationale"`
Judge string `json:"judge"`
}
// CandidateJudge decides whether two near-duplicate patterns are the same hazard.
type CandidateJudge interface {
Name() string
Judge(ctx context.Context, c DedupCandidate, a, b PatternMatch) (verdict, confidence, rationale string)
}
// HeuristicJudge is the deterministic default/fallback. It only ever returns "low"
// confidence — it is a placeholder for the LLM, and it deliberately punts to
// "uncertain" on the hard cases (low text overlap, shared measures) so the queue
// makes clear exactly where the LLM earns its keep.
type HeuristicJudge struct{}
func (HeuristicJudge) Name() string { return "heuristic" }
func (HeuristicJudge) Judge(_ context.Context, c DedupCandidate, _, _ PatternMatch) (string, string, string) {
switch {
case c.ScenarioJaccard >= 0.5 || (c.ZoneJaccard >= 0.5 && c.MeasureJaccard >= 0.5):
return VerdictDuplicate, "low", "structural: high scenario, or combined zone+measure, overlap"
case c.MeasureJaccard >= 0.99 && c.ZoneJaccard == 0 && c.ScenarioJaccard < 0.3:
return VerdictDistinct, "low", "structural: identical measures but no zone/scenario overlap — likely distinct hazards sharing generic measures"
default:
return VerdictUncertain, "low", "structural signal inconclusive — needs the LLM judge"
}
}
// LLMJudge asks an offline model to make the semantic call. Non-deterministic, so
// it lives only in the dev-time tool, never in tests or the runtime. It degrades
// to "uncertain" on any transport or parse error — it must never break the run.
type LLMJudge struct {
Completer LLMCompleter
MachineClass string
}
func (LLMJudge) Name() string { return "llm" }
func (j LLMJudge) Judge(ctx context.Context, c DedupCandidate, a, b PatternMatch) (string, string, string) {
system, user := BuildJudgePrompt(j.MachineClass, a, b)
raw, err := j.Completer.Complete(ctx, system, user)
if err != nil {
return VerdictUncertain, "low", "LLM error: " + err.Error()
}
return parseJudgeJSON(raw)
}
// BuildJudgePrompt is the real LLM artifact — built and unit-tested deterministically
// even though the call itself is not. It frames the ISO 12100 same-vs-distinct
// question and forces a JSON answer.
func BuildJudgePrompt(machineClass string, a, b PatternMatch) (system, user string) {
system = "Du bist Sachverstaendiger fuer Maschinensicherheit nach EN ISO 12100. " +
"Entscheide, ob zwei generierte Gefaehrdungen fuer DIESE Maschine DIESELBE Gefaehrdung " +
"beschreiben (Dublette) oder fachlich VERSCHIEDENE Gefaehrdungen sind, die nur zufaellig " +
"dieselben Schutzmassnahmen teilen. Verschieden, wenn Wirkort, Ausloeser oder " +
"Schadensmechanismus abweichen — auch bei gleicher Kategorie und gleichen Massnahmen. " +
"Antworte AUSSCHLIESSLICH als JSON: " +
`{"verdict":"duplicate|distinct|uncertain","confidence":"high|medium|low","rationale":"..."}.`
user = fmt.Sprintf(`Maschinenklasse: %s
Gefaehrdung A (%s):
Name: %s
Kategorie: %s
Zone: %s
Szenario: %s
Ausloeser: %s
Schaden: %s
Massnahmen: %s
Gefaehrdung B (%s):
Name: %s
Kategorie: %s
Zone: %s
Szenario: %s
Ausloeser: %s
Schaden: %s
Massnahmen: %s
Sind A und B dieselbe Gefaehrdung fuer diese Maschine?`,
machineClass,
a.PatternID, a.PatternName, primaryCat(a), a.ZoneDE, a.ScenarioDE, a.TriggerDE, a.HarmDE, strings.Join(a.SuggestedMeasureIDs, ", "),
b.PatternID, b.PatternName, primaryCat(b), b.ZoneDE, b.ScenarioDE, b.TriggerDE, b.HarmDE, strings.Join(b.SuggestedMeasureIDs, ", "))
return system, user
}
func parseJudgeJSON(raw string) (verdict, confidence, rationale string) {
start, end := strings.Index(raw, "{"), strings.LastIndex(raw, "}")
if start < 0 || end <= start {
return VerdictUncertain, "low", "unparseable LLM output"
}
var v struct {
Verdict string `json:"verdict"`
Confidence string `json:"confidence"`
Rationale string `json:"rationale"`
}
if err := json.Unmarshal([]byte(raw[start:end+1]), &v); err != nil {
return VerdictUncertain, "low", "unparseable LLM JSON: " + err.Error()
}
switch v.Verdict {
case VerdictDuplicate, VerdictDistinct, VerdictUncertain:
default:
v.Verdict = VerdictUncertain
}
if v.Confidence == "" {
v.Confidence = "low"
}
return v.Verdict, v.Confidence, v.Rationale
}
// LLMCompleter is the minimal text-in/text-out the LLM judge needs. Tests pass a
// stub; the dev-time tool passes a registry-backed adapter (NewRegistryCompleter).
type LLMCompleter interface {
Complete(ctx context.Context, system, user string) (string, error)
}
type registryCompleter struct {
reg *llm.ProviderRegistry
model string
}
// NewRegistryCompleter adapts the shared llm.ProviderRegistry to LLMCompleter so
// the proposer can reuse the platform's offline model wiring (e.g. self-hosted qwen).
func NewRegistryCompleter(reg *llm.ProviderRegistry, model string) LLMCompleter {
return &registryCompleter{reg: reg, model: model}
}
func (rc *registryCompleter) Complete(ctx context.Context, system, user string) (string, error) {
resp, err := rc.reg.Chat(ctx, &llm.ChatRequest{
Model: rc.model,
Messages: []llm.Message{
{Role: "system", Content: system},
{Role: "user", Content: user},
},
Temperature: 0,
})
if err != nil {
return "", err
}
return resp.Message.Content, nil
}